Biomarkers of glucose-insulin homeostasis and incident type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease: results from the Vitamin D and Omega-3 trial.

IF 8.5 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Frank Qian, Yanjun Guo, Chunying Li, Yanyan Liu, Heike Luttmann-Gibson, Natalya Gomelskaya, Olga V Demler, Nancy R Cook, I-Min Lee, Julie E Buring, Julia Larsen, Jennifer Boring, Michael J McPhaul, JoAnn E Manson, Aruna D Pradhan, Samia Mora
{"title":"Biomarkers of glucose-insulin homeostasis and incident type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease: results from the Vitamin D and Omega-3 trial.","authors":"Frank Qian, Yanjun Guo, Chunying Li, Yanyan Liu, Heike Luttmann-Gibson, Natalya Gomelskaya, Olga V Demler, Nancy R Cook, I-Min Lee, Julie E Buring, Julia Larsen, Jennifer Boring, Michael J McPhaul, JoAnn E Manson, Aruna D Pradhan, Samia Mora","doi":"10.1186/s12933-024-02470-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dysglycemia and insulin resistance increase type 2 diabetes (T2D) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, yet associations with specific glucose-insulin homeostatic biomarkers have been inconsistent. Vitamin D and marine omega-3 fatty acids (n-3 FA) may improve insulin resistance. We sought to examine the association between baseline levels of insulin, C-peptide, HbA1c, and a novel insulin resistance score (IRS) with incident cardiometabolic diseases, and whether randomized vitamin D or n-3 FA modify these associations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>VITamin D and OmegA-3 TriaL (NCT01169259) was a randomized clinical trial testing vitamin D and n-3 FA for the prevention of CVD and cancer over a median of 5.3 years. Incident cases of T2D and CVD (including cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and coronary revascularization) were matched 1:1 on age, sex, and fasting status to controls. Conditional logistic regressions adjusted for demographic, clinical, and adiposity-related factors were used to assess the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) per-standard deviation (SD) and 95%CI of baseline insulin, C-peptide, HbA1c, and IRS (Insulin×0.0295 + C-peptide×0.00372) with risk of T2D, CVD, and coronary heart disease (CHD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 218 T2D case-control pairs and 715 CVD case-control pairs including 423 with incident CHD. Each of the four biomarkers at baseline was separately associated with incident T2D, aOR (95%CI) per SD increment: insulin 1.46 (1.03, 2.06), C-peptide 2.04 (1.35, 3.09), IRS 1.72 (1.28, 2.31) and HbA1c 7.00 (3.76, 13.02), though only HbA1c remained statistically significant with mutual adjustments. For cardiovascular diseases, we only observed significant associations of HbA1c with CVD (1.19 [1.02, 1.39]), and IRS with CHD (1.25 [1.04, 1.50]), which persisted after mutual adjustment. Randomization to vitamin D and/or n-3 FA did not modify the association of these biomarkers with the endpoints.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Each of insulin, C-peptide, IRS, and HbA1c were associated with incident T2D with the strongest association noted for HbA1c. While HbA1c was significantly associated with CVD risk, a novel IRS appears to be associated with CHD risk. Neither vitamin D nor n-3 FA modified the associations between these biomarkers and cardiometabolic outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9374,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Diabetology","volume":"23 1","pages":"393"},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11531120/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Diabetology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-024-02470-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dysglycemia and insulin resistance increase type 2 diabetes (T2D) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, yet associations with specific glucose-insulin homeostatic biomarkers have been inconsistent. Vitamin D and marine omega-3 fatty acids (n-3 FA) may improve insulin resistance. We sought to examine the association between baseline levels of insulin, C-peptide, HbA1c, and a novel insulin resistance score (IRS) with incident cardiometabolic diseases, and whether randomized vitamin D or n-3 FA modify these associations.

Methods: VITamin D and OmegA-3 TriaL (NCT01169259) was a randomized clinical trial testing vitamin D and n-3 FA for the prevention of CVD and cancer over a median of 5.3 years. Incident cases of T2D and CVD (including cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and coronary revascularization) were matched 1:1 on age, sex, and fasting status to controls. Conditional logistic regressions adjusted for demographic, clinical, and adiposity-related factors were used to assess the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) per-standard deviation (SD) and 95%CI of baseline insulin, C-peptide, HbA1c, and IRS (Insulin×0.0295 + C-peptide×0.00372) with risk of T2D, CVD, and coronary heart disease (CHD).

Results: We identified 218 T2D case-control pairs and 715 CVD case-control pairs including 423 with incident CHD. Each of the four biomarkers at baseline was separately associated with incident T2D, aOR (95%CI) per SD increment: insulin 1.46 (1.03, 2.06), C-peptide 2.04 (1.35, 3.09), IRS 1.72 (1.28, 2.31) and HbA1c 7.00 (3.76, 13.02), though only HbA1c remained statistically significant with mutual adjustments. For cardiovascular diseases, we only observed significant associations of HbA1c with CVD (1.19 [1.02, 1.39]), and IRS with CHD (1.25 [1.04, 1.50]), which persisted after mutual adjustment. Randomization to vitamin D and/or n-3 FA did not modify the association of these biomarkers with the endpoints.

Conclusions: Each of insulin, C-peptide, IRS, and HbA1c were associated with incident T2D with the strongest association noted for HbA1c. While HbA1c was significantly associated with CVD risk, a novel IRS appears to be associated with CHD risk. Neither vitamin D nor n-3 FA modified the associations between these biomarkers and cardiometabolic outcomes.

葡萄糖-胰岛素平衡的生物标志物与 2 型糖尿病和心血管疾病的发病率:维生素 D 和欧米茄-3 试验的结果。
背景:血糖异常和胰岛素抵抗会增加 2 型糖尿病(T2D)和心血管疾病(CVD)的风险,但与特定葡萄糖-胰岛素稳态生物标志物之间的关系并不一致。维生素 D 和海洋ω-3 脂肪酸(n-3 FA)可改善胰岛素抵抗。我们试图研究胰岛素、C 肽、HbA1c 和新型胰岛素抵抗评分(IRS)的基线水平与心血管代谢疾病之间的关联,以及随机维生素 D 或 n-3 脂肪酸是否会改变这些关联:维生素 D 和 OmegA-3 TriaL(NCT01169259)是一项随机临床试验,测试维生素 D 和 n-3 FA 在中位 5.3 年的时间内对心血管疾病和癌症的预防作用。T2D和心血管疾病(包括心血管死亡、心肌梗死、中风和冠状动脉血运重建)的发病病例与对照组在年龄、性别和空腹状态上进行了1:1配对。通过对人口、临床和脂肪相关因素进行条件逻辑回归调整,评估基线胰岛素、C肽、HbA1c和IRS(胰岛素×0.0295 + C肽×0.00372)与T2D、心血管疾病和冠心病(CHD)风险的每标准差(SD)和95%CI调整后的几率比(aOR):我们确定了 218 对 T2D 病例对照和 715 对心血管疾病病例对照,其中包括 423 例冠心病患者。基线时的四种生物标志物中的每一种都分别与 T2D 事件相关,每 SD 增量的 aOR (95%CI) 分别为:胰岛素 1.46 (1.03, 2.06)、C 肽 2.04 (1.35, 3.09)、IRS 1.72 (1.28, 2.31) 和 HbA1c 7.00 (3.76, 13.02),但只有 HbA1c 在相互调整后仍具有统计学意义。在心血管疾病方面,我们只观察到 HbA1c 与心血管疾病(1.19 [1.02, 1.39])和 IRS 与冠心病(1.25 [1.04, 1.50])有显著相关性,这种相关性在相互调整后仍然存在。维生素 D 和/或 n-3 脂肪酸的随机化并未改变这些生物标志物与终点的相关性:结论:胰岛素、C肽、IRS和HbA1c均与T2D的发生有关,其中HbA1c的关联性最强。虽然 HbA1c 与心血管疾病风险显著相关,但一种新型 IRS 似乎与心血管疾病风险相关。维生素 D 和 n-3 脂肪酸都不会改变这些生物标志物与心脏代谢结果之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Diabetology
Cardiovascular Diabetology 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
15.10%
发文量
240
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Diabetology is a journal that welcomes manuscripts exploring various aspects of the relationship between diabetes, cardiovascular health, and the metabolic syndrome. We invite submissions related to clinical studies, genetic investigations, experimental research, pharmacological studies, epidemiological analyses, and molecular biology research in this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信