Factors affecting outcome of acquired comitant esotropia with restricted use of digital devices: ACEDD Study 3.

IF 2 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Noriko Nishikawa, Hirohito Iimori, Reiko Kinouchi, Sachiko Nishina, Tomoyo Yoshida, Akiko Hikoya, Miwa Komori, Osamu Hieda, Toshiaki Goseki, Takafumi Mori, Takeshi Morimoto, Takashi Negishi, Tamami Shimizu, Yukiko Shimizu, Shion Hayashi, Yoshiko Sugiyama, Yoshimi Yokoyama, Akiko Kimura, Hiroko Suzuki, Sadao Suzuki, Noriyuki Azuma, Miho Sato
{"title":"Factors affecting outcome of acquired comitant esotropia with restricted use of digital devices: ACEDD Study 3.","authors":"Noriko Nishikawa, Hirohito Iimori, Reiko Kinouchi, Sachiko Nishina, Tomoyo Yoshida, Akiko Hikoya, Miwa Komori, Osamu Hieda, Toshiaki Goseki, Takafumi Mori, Takeshi Morimoto, Takashi Negishi, Tamami Shimizu, Yukiko Shimizu, Shion Hayashi, Yoshiko Sugiyama, Yoshimi Yokoyama, Akiko Kimura, Hiroko Suzuki, Sadao Suzuki, Noriyuki Azuma, Miho Sato","doi":"10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study is to investigate factors associated with outcomes after 3 months of instructed usage of hand-held digital devices (DD) in patients with acquired comitant esotropia (ACE).</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>This prospective multicentre observational study included patients with ACE, aged 5-35 years, who used DD within 1 year of onset and were followed up for clinical findings and instructed use of DD. The outcomes were classified into four groups: cured, improved, unchanged and worsened. After the analysis of group differences in the clinical and DD use-related factors by univariate analysis, we used ordinal logistic regression models to identify factors associated with favourable outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 156 patients (mean age (SD): 16.4 (7.4) years), 10 (6%), 58 (37%), 67 (43%) and 21 (14%) were classified into the cured, improved, unchanged, and worsened, respectively. In the univariate analysis, consultation within 3 months of onset, small-angle strabismus at distance and good stereoacuity were associated with good outcomes. Ordinal logistic regression analysis on adjusting for age with stereoacuity or successful DD-use time halving showed that small-angle strabismus at distance (OR: 1.02, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.03, p=0.023), good stereoacuity (OR: 1.31; 95% CI 1.10 to 1.56; p=0.003) and successful halving of DD-use time (OR: 0.63; 95% CI 0.43 to 0.92; p=0.016) influenced favourable outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with small-angle esotropia, good stereoacuity on consultation and success in halving DD-use time had a higher chance of recovery through instructional DD usage. Further studies using objectively measurable systems are needed to ensure the accuracy of DD-use time.</p>","PeriodicalId":9286,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11529450/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001713","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study is to investigate factors associated with outcomes after 3 months of instructed usage of hand-held digital devices (DD) in patients with acquired comitant esotropia (ACE).

Methods and analysis: This prospective multicentre observational study included patients with ACE, aged 5-35 years, who used DD within 1 year of onset and were followed up for clinical findings and instructed use of DD. The outcomes were classified into four groups: cured, improved, unchanged and worsened. After the analysis of group differences in the clinical and DD use-related factors by univariate analysis, we used ordinal logistic regression models to identify factors associated with favourable outcomes.

Results: Of 156 patients (mean age (SD): 16.4 (7.4) years), 10 (6%), 58 (37%), 67 (43%) and 21 (14%) were classified into the cured, improved, unchanged, and worsened, respectively. In the univariate analysis, consultation within 3 months of onset, small-angle strabismus at distance and good stereoacuity were associated with good outcomes. Ordinal logistic regression analysis on adjusting for age with stereoacuity or successful DD-use time halving showed that small-angle strabismus at distance (OR: 1.02, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.03, p=0.023), good stereoacuity (OR: 1.31; 95% CI 1.10 to 1.56; p=0.003) and successful halving of DD-use time (OR: 0.63; 95% CI 0.43 to 0.92; p=0.016) influenced favourable outcomes.

Conclusion: Patients with small-angle esotropia, good stereoacuity on consultation and success in halving DD-use time had a higher chance of recovery through instructional DD usage. Further studies using objectively measurable systems are needed to ensure the accuracy of DD-use time.

影响限制使用数字设备的后天合并内斜视疗效的因素:ACEDD 研究 3。
研究目的本研究旨在调查获得性合并内斜视(ACE)患者在接受指导使用手持数码设备(DD)3个月后的效果相关因素:这项前瞻性多中心观察研究纳入了年龄在5-35岁之间、在发病后1年内使用过手持数码设备的ACE患者,并对其临床结果和数码设备的指导使用情况进行了随访。研究结果分为四组:治愈、好转、不变和恶化。在通过单变量分析对临床和 DD 使用相关因素的组间差异进行分析后,我们使用序数逻辑回归模型来确定与有利结果相关的因素:在 156 名患者(平均年龄(标清):16.4(7.4)岁)中,分别有 10 人(6%)、58 人(37%)、67 人(43%)和 21 人(14%)被分为治愈、好转、不变和恶化。在单变量分析中,发病 3 个月内就诊、远距离小角度斜视和良好的立体视视力与良好结果相关。调整年龄、立体视敏锐度或成功将DD使用时间减半的顺序逻辑回归分析表明,远距离小角度斜视(OR:1.02,95% CI 1.00至1.03,p=0.023)、立体视敏锐度良好(OR:1.31;95% CI 1.10至1.56;p=0.003)和成功将DD使用时间减半(OR:0.63;95% CI 0.43至0.92;p=0.016)对良好疗效有影响:结论:患有小角度内斜视、就诊时立体视清晰度良好且成功将DD使用时间减半的患者,通过指导使用DD康复的几率更高。需要使用可客观测量的系统进行进一步研究,以确保定向行走使用时间的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Ophthalmology
BMJ Open Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
104
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信