Chromosomal abnormalities in oocyte donor candidates: a French survey of over 8200 karyotypes.

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Vincent Puy, Badria Bennani Smires, Jean-Pierre Siffroi, Julie Barberet, Marion Bendayan, Oxana Blagosklonov, Florence Brugnon, Rosalie Cabry-Goubet, Marie-Ange Clarotti, Sophie Catteau-Jonard, Céline Chalas, Lucie Chansel-Debordeaux, Béatrice Delepine, Laetitia Hesters, Stéphanie Lattès, Floriane Lefeuve, Arthur Luton, Catherine Metzler-Guillemain, Sophie Mirallié, Joffrey Mons, Valerica-Gabriela Oancea, Nathalie Rives, Nathalie Sermondade, Anna Tournier, Catherine Vincent-Delorme, Gérard Tachdjian, Eva Pipiras, Florence Eustache
{"title":"Chromosomal abnormalities in oocyte donor candidates: a French survey of over 8200 karyotypes.","authors":"Vincent Puy, Badria Bennani Smires, Jean-Pierre Siffroi, Julie Barberet, Marion Bendayan, Oxana Blagosklonov, Florence Brugnon, Rosalie Cabry-Goubet, Marie-Ange Clarotti, Sophie Catteau-Jonard, Céline Chalas, Lucie Chansel-Debordeaux, Béatrice Delepine, Laetitia Hesters, Stéphanie Lattès, Floriane Lefeuve, Arthur Luton, Catherine Metzler-Guillemain, Sophie Mirallié, Joffrey Mons, Valerica-Gabriela Oancea, Nathalie Rives, Nathalie Sermondade, Anna Tournier, Catherine Vincent-Delorme, Gérard Tachdjian, Eva Pipiras, Florence Eustache","doi":"10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.10.037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To study karyotypes of more than 8,200 oocyte donor candidates in nulliparous or multiparous women compared to a reference population.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective observational multicentric study.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>The study included two cohorts of oocyte donor candidates recruited between January 2005 and October 2021: multiparous women with at least one child at the time of recruitment, and nulliparous women. Both were compared to a reference population composed of female newborns from literature.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Blood lymphocyte karyotype.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 8229 oocyte donor candidates from 22 fertility centers were included in this study. Nulliparous women (n=1890) and multiparous ones (n=6339) were compared to 8102 female newborns. Overall, 65 candidates were carriers of chromosomal abnormalities and were therefore excluded from the donation process (0.79%, 95% CI: 0.60-0.98). The occurrence of balanced structural chromosomal rearrangements was globally increased in the study population (0.49%, 95% CI: 0.34-0.64) compared to female newborns (0.24%, 95% CI: 0.34-0.64, p=0.0086). The number of reciprocal translocations was increased 5-fold in nulliparous oocyte donor candidates (0.37%, 95% CI: 0.10-0.64, p=0.013). The incidence of sex chromosome mosaicism was notably increased in multiparous oocyte donor candidates, with 17 cases (0.27%, 95% CI: 0.14-0.40, p=0.0052). Among chromosomal aberration carriers only two nulliparous women (one reciprocal translocation and one sex chromosome mosaicism) had fertility issues with a diagnosis of premature ovarian failure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this comprehensive 16-years French experience of karyotyping in oocyte donor candidates, we confirmed an increased incidence of balanced structural chromosomal rearrangements, especially among those without children at the time of recruitment. Karyotyping could be considered to identify any chromosomal abnormalities that may not be easily detectable through medical questioning. These abnormalities pose an inherent genetic risk for gamete recipients if left undetected.</p>","PeriodicalId":12275,"journal":{"name":"Fertility and sterility","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fertility and sterility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.10.037","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To study karyotypes of more than 8,200 oocyte donor candidates in nulliparous or multiparous women compared to a reference population.

Design: A retrospective observational multicentric study.

Subjects: The study included two cohorts of oocyte donor candidates recruited between January 2005 and October 2021: multiparous women with at least one child at the time of recruitment, and nulliparous women. Both were compared to a reference population composed of female newborns from literature.

Exposure: Not applicable.

Main outcome measures: Blood lymphocyte karyotype.

Results: A total of 8229 oocyte donor candidates from 22 fertility centers were included in this study. Nulliparous women (n=1890) and multiparous ones (n=6339) were compared to 8102 female newborns. Overall, 65 candidates were carriers of chromosomal abnormalities and were therefore excluded from the donation process (0.79%, 95% CI: 0.60-0.98). The occurrence of balanced structural chromosomal rearrangements was globally increased in the study population (0.49%, 95% CI: 0.34-0.64) compared to female newborns (0.24%, 95% CI: 0.34-0.64, p=0.0086). The number of reciprocal translocations was increased 5-fold in nulliparous oocyte donor candidates (0.37%, 95% CI: 0.10-0.64, p=0.013). The incidence of sex chromosome mosaicism was notably increased in multiparous oocyte donor candidates, with 17 cases (0.27%, 95% CI: 0.14-0.40, p=0.0052). Among chromosomal aberration carriers only two nulliparous women (one reciprocal translocation and one sex chromosome mosaicism) had fertility issues with a diagnosis of premature ovarian failure.

Conclusion: In this comprehensive 16-years French experience of karyotyping in oocyte donor candidates, we confirmed an increased incidence of balanced structural chromosomal rearrangements, especially among those without children at the time of recruitment. Karyotyping could be considered to identify any chromosomal abnormalities that may not be easily detectable through medical questioning. These abnormalities pose an inherent genetic risk for gamete recipients if left undetected.

卵细胞捐献者染色体异常:法国对 8200 多例核型的调查。
目的研究 8200 多名卵母细胞捐献者的核型,并与参考人群进行比较:设计:回顾性多中心观察研究:研究包括 2005 年 1 月至 2021 年 10 月间招募的两组卵母细胞捐献者:招募时至少有一个孩子的多产妇和无产妇。两者均与文献中由女性新生儿组成的参考人群进行了比较:血液淋巴细胞核型:本研究共纳入了来自 22 家生殖中心的 8229 名卵细胞捐献者。将单胎妇女(1890 人)和多胎妇女(6339 人)与 8102 名女性新生儿进行了比较。总体而言,65 名候选人为染色体异常携带者,因此被排除在捐献过程之外(0.79%,95% CI:0.60-0.98)。与女性新生儿(0.24%,95% CI:0.34-0.64,P=0.0086)相比,研究人群中染色体平衡结构重排的发生率在全球范围内有所增加(0.49%,95% CI:0.34-0.64)。空腹卵母细胞捐献者的互变数量增加了 5 倍(0.37%,95% CI:0.10-0.64,P=0.013)。性染色体嵌合的发生率在多产卵母细胞捐献者中明显增加,有 17 例(0.27%,95% CI:0.14-0.40,p=0.0052)。在染色体畸变携带者中,只有两名非绝经期妇女(一名互易位和一名性染色体嵌合)有生育问题,并被诊断为卵巢早衰:在法国长达 16 年的卵母细胞捐献者核型检查中,我们证实平衡染色体结构重排的发生率有所上升,尤其是在招募时未生育的女性中。可以考虑进行核型分析,以确定通过医学询问不易发现的染色体异常。这些异常如果未被发现,会给配子受体带来固有的遗传风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fertility and sterility
Fertility and sterility 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
6.00%
发文量
1446
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Fertility and Sterility® is an international journal for obstetricians, gynecologists, reproductive endocrinologists, urologists, basic scientists and others who treat and investigate problems of infertility and human reproductive disorders. The journal publishes juried original scientific articles in clinical and laboratory research relevant to reproductive endocrinology, urology, andrology, physiology, immunology, genetics, contraception, and menopause. Fertility and Sterility® encourages and supports meaningful basic and clinical research, and facilitates and promotes excellence in professional education, in the field of reproductive medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信