Smartphone Evaluation of Dynamic and Static Naturalness After Double-Eyelid Blepharoplasty.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Ce Zhang, Qinhao Gu, Lulu Chen, Ji Wang, Hangyan Shi, Jingyu Li, Sufan Wu
{"title":"Smartphone Evaluation of Dynamic and Static Naturalness After Double-Eyelid Blepharoplasty.","authors":"Ce Zhang, Qinhao Gu, Lulu Chen, Ji Wang, Hangyan Shi, Jingyu Li, Sufan Wu","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjae223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent studies on post-operative measurements for upper blepharoplasty utilized static photographs, which fail to accurately reflect the post-surgical dynamic naturalness of the eyelids.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to analyze dynamic naturalness after double-eyelid blepharoplasty using a simple smartphone method involving slow-motion videos.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective observational study enrolled patients who underwent double-eyelid blepharoplasty using the flexible suspension technique (FST) and rigid fixation technique (RFT) and individuals with congenital double-eyelids. Demographic information was collected, and super-slow-motion videos of the eye-opening processes were recorded using a smartphone. Four keyframes were selected from each video, from which several parameters were measured. A third party evaluated the degree of naturalness of the photographs and eye-opening videos.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty women (20 per group) were enrolled. The fold-emerging delay (FED) score showed a linear correlation with the mean third-party dynamic naturalness rating (DNR) (R2=0.71, p<0.0001). The Puffy score showed a linear correlation with the mean third-party static naturalness rating (SNR) (R2=0.53, p<0.0001). For the congenital, FST, and RFT groups, respectively, the FED scores were 62.9±18.9, 52.2±17.7, and 26.3±18.3 (all p<0.05), the Puffy scores were 49.8±11.9, 55.9±11.0, and 62.6±12.4 (Congenital vs FST, p=0.055; others p<0.05), the mean third-party DNRs were 3.21±0.67, 2.47±0.62, and 1.78±0.74 (all p<0.0001), and the mean third-party SNRs were 3.01±0.78, 2.61±0.55, and 2.14±0.69 (all p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The two new indices obtained from the analysis of smartphone-captured super-slow-motion videos are good indicators of dynamic naturalness of double-eyelids created using upper blepharoplasty.</p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjae223","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recent studies on post-operative measurements for upper blepharoplasty utilized static photographs, which fail to accurately reflect the post-surgical dynamic naturalness of the eyelids.

Objectives: This study aimed to analyze dynamic naturalness after double-eyelid blepharoplasty using a simple smartphone method involving slow-motion videos.

Methods: This prospective observational study enrolled patients who underwent double-eyelid blepharoplasty using the flexible suspension technique (FST) and rigid fixation technique (RFT) and individuals with congenital double-eyelids. Demographic information was collected, and super-slow-motion videos of the eye-opening processes were recorded using a smartphone. Four keyframes were selected from each video, from which several parameters were measured. A third party evaluated the degree of naturalness of the photographs and eye-opening videos.

Results: Sixty women (20 per group) were enrolled. The fold-emerging delay (FED) score showed a linear correlation with the mean third-party dynamic naturalness rating (DNR) (R2=0.71, p<0.0001). The Puffy score showed a linear correlation with the mean third-party static naturalness rating (SNR) (R2=0.53, p<0.0001). For the congenital, FST, and RFT groups, respectively, the FED scores were 62.9±18.9, 52.2±17.7, and 26.3±18.3 (all p<0.05), the Puffy scores were 49.8±11.9, 55.9±11.0, and 62.6±12.4 (Congenital vs FST, p=0.055; others p<0.05), the mean third-party DNRs were 3.21±0.67, 2.47±0.62, and 1.78±0.74 (all p<0.0001), and the mean third-party SNRs were 3.01±0.78, 2.61±0.55, and 2.14±0.69 (all p<0.05).

Conclusions: The two new indices obtained from the analysis of smartphone-captured super-slow-motion videos are good indicators of dynamic naturalness of double-eyelids created using upper blepharoplasty.

智能手机评估双眼皮成形术后的动态和静态自然度。
背景:最近关于上眼睑整形术后测量的研究使用的是静态照片,无法准确反映术后眼睑的动态自然度:本研究旨在使用一种简单的智能手机慢动作视频方法分析双眼皮成形术后的动态自然度:这项前瞻性观察研究招募了使用柔性悬吊技术(FST)和刚性固定技术(RFT)进行双眼皮成形术的患者以及先天性双眼皮患者。研究人员收集了人口统计学信息,并使用智能手机录制了睁眼过程的超慢动作视频。从每段视频中选取四个关键帧,并从中测量多个参数。由第三方对照片和睁眼视频的自然程度进行评估:共有 60 名妇女(每组 20 人)参加了研究。褶皱出现延迟(FED)得分与第三方动态自然度评分(DNR)的平均值呈线性相关(R2=0.71,p 结论:通过研究得出的两个新指数与褶皱出现延迟(FED)得分呈线性相关(R2=0.71,p):通过分析智能手机拍摄的超慢动作视频获得的两个新指标,可以很好地反映出通过上睑成形术形成的双眼皮的动态自然度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
20.70%
发文量
309
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Surgery Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal focusing on scientific developments and clinical techniques in aesthetic surgery. The official publication of The Aesthetic Society, ASJ is also the official English-language journal of many major international societies of plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery representing South America, Central America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. It is also the official journal of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and The Rhinoplasty Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信