Evaluation of the Microbiology of Removed Punctal Plugs and Intracanalicular Devices.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Jay J Meyer, Karissa Culbreath, Edward Ager, Neda Esmaili, William C Fowler, Peter Gilligan, Amy M Fowler
{"title":"Evaluation of the Microbiology of Removed Punctal Plugs and Intracanalicular Devices.","authors":"Jay J Meyer, Karissa Culbreath, Edward Ager, Neda Esmaili, William C Fowler, Peter Gilligan, Amy M Fowler","doi":"10.1097/ICL.0000000000001145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this observational study was to characterize the microorganisms colonizing punctal plugs and intracanalicular stents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Devices were removed from participants who previously underwent placement of punctal plugs for tear insufficiency and lacrimal stents for dacryocystorhinostomy and canalicular reconstruction procedures. After removal of the devices, they were cultured for organisms both with and without sonication to loosen any biofilms or adherent microorganisms. Primary outcome measures included culture positivity, identification of isolated microorganisms, recovery of microorganisms from culture after sonication, and clinical evidence of ocular infection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no cases of clinical infection. A total of 181 specimens were processed (174 punctal plugs, seven intracanalicular stents), of which 98 (54%) were culture positive. Of the punctal plugs, 92 (52.9%) were culture positive, including 42 with a single organism isolated, whereas 22 yielded two organisms, 7 yielded three organisms, and the remaining 21 yielded a polymicrobial culture with four or more organisms. The most common isolates from punctal plugs were coagulase negative staphylococci (27.6%), diphtheroids (16.4%), and streptococcus viridans (10.2%). Those plugs with polymicrobial culture results grew a mixture of organisms most consistent with skin or upper respiratory flora. Of the intracanalicular stents, 6 (85.6%) were culture positive.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Punctal plugs and intracanalicular devices can become colonized with bacteria composed of oropharyngeal flora, skin flora, and other rare but potentially significant pathogens.</p>","PeriodicalId":50457,"journal":{"name":"Eye & Contact Lens-Science and Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eye & Contact Lens-Science and Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000001145","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this observational study was to characterize the microorganisms colonizing punctal plugs and intracanalicular stents.

Methods: Devices were removed from participants who previously underwent placement of punctal plugs for tear insufficiency and lacrimal stents for dacryocystorhinostomy and canalicular reconstruction procedures. After removal of the devices, they were cultured for organisms both with and without sonication to loosen any biofilms or adherent microorganisms. Primary outcome measures included culture positivity, identification of isolated microorganisms, recovery of microorganisms from culture after sonication, and clinical evidence of ocular infection.

Results: There were no cases of clinical infection. A total of 181 specimens were processed (174 punctal plugs, seven intracanalicular stents), of which 98 (54%) were culture positive. Of the punctal plugs, 92 (52.9%) were culture positive, including 42 with a single organism isolated, whereas 22 yielded two organisms, 7 yielded three organisms, and the remaining 21 yielded a polymicrobial culture with four or more organisms. The most common isolates from punctal plugs were coagulase negative staphylococci (27.6%), diphtheroids (16.4%), and streptococcus viridans (10.2%). Those plugs with polymicrobial culture results grew a mixture of organisms most consistent with skin or upper respiratory flora. Of the intracanalicular stents, 6 (85.6%) were culture positive.

Conclusions: Punctal plugs and intracanalicular devices can become colonized with bacteria composed of oropharyngeal flora, skin flora, and other rare but potentially significant pathogens.

评估取出的穿孔塞和椎管内装置的微生物学。
研究目的本观察性研究的目的是了解在穿刺栓和泪道支架上定植的微生物的特征:方法:从曾因泪液分泌不足接受过穿刺栓置入术和因泪囊鼻腔造口术和泪道重建术接受过泪道支架置入术的参与者身上取出器械。取出装置后,对其进行生物培养,包括超声和不超声,以松解任何生物膜或附着的微生物。主要结果指标包括培养阳性率、分离微生物的鉴定、超声处理后培养微生物的回收率以及眼部感染的临床证据:结果:没有临床感染病例。共处理了 181 份标本(174 个穿刺栓,7 个椎管内支架),其中 98 份(54%)培养呈阳性。在穿刺栓中,有 92 个(52.9%)培养呈阳性,其中 42 个只分离出一种病原体,22 个分离出两种病原体,7 个分离出三种病原体,其余 21 个分离出四种或四种以上病原体的多微生物培养物。穿刺栓中最常见的分离菌是凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(27.6%)、双球菌(16.4%)和病毒性链球菌(10.2%)。多微生物培养结果显示,插管中生长的微生物与皮肤或上呼吸道菌群最为一致。在椎管内支架中,有 6 个(85.6%)培养结果呈阳性:结论:穿孔塞和椎管内装置可能会被由口咽菌群、皮肤菌群和其他罕见但潜在的重要病原体组成的细菌定植。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
150
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Eye & Contact Lens: Science and Clinical Practice is the official journal of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists (CLAO), an international educational association for anterior segment research and clinical practice of interest to ophthalmologists, optometrists, and other vision care providers and researchers. Focusing especially on contact lenses, it also covers dry eye disease, MGD, infections, toxicity of drops and contact lens care solutions, topography, cornea surgery and post-operative care, optics, refractive surgery and corneal stability (eg, UV cross-linking). Peer-reviewed and published six times annually, it is a highly respected scientific journal in its field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信