{"title":"Factors affecting the accuracy of fetal cardiac ultrasound screening in the first trimester of pregnancy.","authors":"Shin Hashiramoto, Mayumi Kaneko, Hiroko Takita, Yuka Yamashita, Ryu Matsuoka, Akihiko Sekizawa","doi":"10.1007/s10396-024-01505-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Most studies on the performance of first-trimester cardiac screening have concentrated on comparing the detection rate between different protocols and not on the actual reason for false-negative results. Herein, we report the performance of first-trimester congenital heart disease (CHD) screening and factors that may affect the detection rate of CHDs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study included patients who underwent first-trimester screening and subsequently gave birth at our facility. We analyzed the performance of first-trimester screening for CHD and major CHD (CHD requiring cardiac surgery or interventional catheterization within 12 months of birth).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 6614 fetuses included, 53 had CHD and 35 had major CHD. For the prenatal diagnosis of CHD, the detection rate, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and first-trimester detection rate for CHD were 64.1%, 99.9%, 94.4%, 99.7%, and 82.9%, respectively; the respective values for major CHD were 85.7%, 99.96%, 93.75%, 99.92%, and 85.7%. The detection rate was not significantly different when classified by crown-rump length or number of fetuses. A weak correlation was observed between low detection rate of major CHD and lower maternal body mass index (BMI) (correlation ratio: 0.17). The detection rate was significantly higher when the fetus was scanned with its spine at the 5-7 o'clock position (posterior spine) than at other positions (odds ratio: 3.82, 95% confidence interval: 1.16-12.5, p = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Posterior spine contributes to an improved diagnostic rate in first-trimester CHD screening. In addition, sonographers must recognize that low maternal BMI is a risk factor of false-negative results.</p>","PeriodicalId":50130,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Ultrasonics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Ultrasonics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-024-01505-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Most studies on the performance of first-trimester cardiac screening have concentrated on comparing the detection rate between different protocols and not on the actual reason for false-negative results. Herein, we report the performance of first-trimester congenital heart disease (CHD) screening and factors that may affect the detection rate of CHDs.
Methods: This retrospective observational study included patients who underwent first-trimester screening and subsequently gave birth at our facility. We analyzed the performance of first-trimester screening for CHD and major CHD (CHD requiring cardiac surgery or interventional catheterization within 12 months of birth).
Results: Of the 6614 fetuses included, 53 had CHD and 35 had major CHD. For the prenatal diagnosis of CHD, the detection rate, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and first-trimester detection rate for CHD were 64.1%, 99.9%, 94.4%, 99.7%, and 82.9%, respectively; the respective values for major CHD were 85.7%, 99.96%, 93.75%, 99.92%, and 85.7%. The detection rate was not significantly different when classified by crown-rump length or number of fetuses. A weak correlation was observed between low detection rate of major CHD and lower maternal body mass index (BMI) (correlation ratio: 0.17). The detection rate was significantly higher when the fetus was scanned with its spine at the 5-7 o'clock position (posterior spine) than at other positions (odds ratio: 3.82, 95% confidence interval: 1.16-12.5, p = 0.02).
Conclusion: Posterior spine contributes to an improved diagnostic rate in first-trimester CHD screening. In addition, sonographers must recognize that low maternal BMI is a risk factor of false-negative results.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Medical Ultrasonics is the official journal of the Japan Society of Ultrasonics in Medicine. The main purpose of the journal is to provide forum for the publication of papers documenting recent advances and new developments in the entire field of ultrasound in medicine and biology, encompassing both the medical and the engineering aspects of the science.The journal welcomes original articles, review articles, images, and letters to the editor.The journal also provides state-of-the-art information such as announcements from the boards and the committees of the society.