(Re)conceptualising Good Care in Hospital Settings From the Perspectives of Older Persons: A Concept Analysis Using Pragmatic Utility

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Nick Anthony Millar, Matthias Hoben, Sherry Dahlke, Kathleen F. Hunter
{"title":"(Re)conceptualising Good Care in Hospital Settings From the Perspectives of Older Persons: A Concept Analysis Using Pragmatic Utility","authors":"Nick Anthony Millar,&nbsp;Matthias Hoben,&nbsp;Sherry Dahlke,&nbsp;Kathleen F. Hunter","doi":"10.1111/opn.12665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To understand good care from the perspective of hospitalised older persons.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Older persons are the largest group of hospital users, and numbers will increase in the next decades. Hospital organisations are attempting to transform traditional care models to meet the specialised needs of hospitalised older persons. To achieve this, healthcare providers including nurses and administrators need to understand the perspectives of hospitalised older persons on what constitutes good care. This knowledge is critical to nursing to ensure that care aligns with the perceived needs of hospitalised older persons. However, good care from the viewpoints of hospitalised older persons remains ambiguous and poorly delineated in the literature.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a concept analysis using the pragmatic utility method. To identify peer-reviewed articles, we searched CINAHL, MedLine, PsycINFO, Scopus and Embase databases for related literature using the keywords and related terms to ‘good care’, ‘hospital or acute care’ and ‘older persons’.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-two peer-reviewed articles out of 2144 search results were included. The heterogeneity of older persons' perspectives and limitations in the literature on good care led to a tentative understanding. Good care, a partially mature concept, is the provision of person-centred, culturally sensitive, holistic and integrated care that fosters autonomy, control and participation, resulting in a sense of belonging, smooth transitions, optimal management of clinical conditions, satisfaction in care and informed older persons and family caregivers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Older persons are a heterogeneous group with diverse perceptions of good care. Instead of seeking a common understanding of good care, efforts should be focused on identifying individual preferences, values and goals of hospitalised older persons.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications for Practice</h3>\n \n <p>The components of good care are important for many hospitalised older persons and can serve as a starting point for improvements in practice settings. However, this understanding is tentative and may overlook critical aspects of care at an individual level. Hospital organisations, healthcare providers and nurses should be cognizant of this limitation and cultivate adaptability for an individualised approach to care.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48651,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Older People Nursing","volume":"19 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/opn.12665","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Older People Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/opn.12665","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To understand good care from the perspective of hospitalised older persons.

Background

Older persons are the largest group of hospital users, and numbers will increase in the next decades. Hospital organisations are attempting to transform traditional care models to meet the specialised needs of hospitalised older persons. To achieve this, healthcare providers including nurses and administrators need to understand the perspectives of hospitalised older persons on what constitutes good care. This knowledge is critical to nursing to ensure that care aligns with the perceived needs of hospitalised older persons. However, good care from the viewpoints of hospitalised older persons remains ambiguous and poorly delineated in the literature.

Methods

We conducted a concept analysis using the pragmatic utility method. To identify peer-reviewed articles, we searched CINAHL, MedLine, PsycINFO, Scopus and Embase databases for related literature using the keywords and related terms to ‘good care’, ‘hospital or acute care’ and ‘older persons’.

Results

Twenty-two peer-reviewed articles out of 2144 search results were included. The heterogeneity of older persons' perspectives and limitations in the literature on good care led to a tentative understanding. Good care, a partially mature concept, is the provision of person-centred, culturally sensitive, holistic and integrated care that fosters autonomy, control and participation, resulting in a sense of belonging, smooth transitions, optimal management of clinical conditions, satisfaction in care and informed older persons and family caregivers.

Conclusion

Older persons are a heterogeneous group with diverse perceptions of good care. Instead of seeking a common understanding of good care, efforts should be focused on identifying individual preferences, values and goals of hospitalised older persons.

Implications for Practice

The components of good care are important for many hospitalised older persons and can serve as a starting point for improvements in practice settings. However, this understanding is tentative and may overlook critical aspects of care at an individual level. Hospital organisations, healthcare providers and nurses should be cognizant of this limitation and cultivate adaptability for an individualised approach to care.

Abstract Image

(从老年人的角度(重新)概念化医院环境中的良好护理:利用实用性进行概念分析。
目的:从住院老年人的角度了解良好护理:背景:老年人是使用医院服务人数最多的群体,而且在未来几十年内人数还会增加。医院组织正试图改变传统的护理模式,以满足住院老年人的特殊需求。为了实现这一目标,包括护士和管理人员在内的医疗服务提供者需要了解住院老年人对什么是良好护理的看法。这些知识对护理工作至关重要,可以确保护理工作符合住院老年人的需求。然而,从住院老年人的角度来看,良好护理在文献中的定义仍然模糊不清:我们采用实用工具法进行了概念分析。为了确定同行评审文章,我们使用 "良好护理"、"医院或急症护理 "和 "老年人 "等关键词和相关术语在 CINAHL、MedLine、PsycINFO、Scopus 和 Embase 数据库中搜索相关文献:在 2144 条搜索结果中,有 22 篇经同行评审的文章被收录。由于老年人的观点各不相同,而且有关良好护理的文献也存在局限性,因此我们对良好护理有了初步的认识。良好护理是一个部分成熟的概念,是指提供以人为本、文化敏感、全面和综合的护理,促进自主、控制和参与,从而产生归属感、平稳过渡、临床状况的最佳管理、对护理的满意度以及老年人和家庭护理者的知情权:结论:老年人是一个多元化的群体,对良好护理有着不同的认识。结论:老年人是一个异质群体,对良好护理的看法各不相同。与其寻求对良好护理的共同理解,不如集中精力确定住院老年人的个人偏好、价值观和目标:对实践的启示:良好护理的要素对许多住院老年人非常重要,可以作为改善实践环境的起点。然而,这种理解只是暂时的,可能会忽略个人层面护理的关键方面。医院组织、医疗服务提供者和护士应认识到这一局限性,并培养个性化护理方法的适应性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: International Journal of Older People Nursing welcomes scholarly papers on all aspects of older people nursing including research, practice, education, management, and policy. We publish manuscripts that further scholarly inquiry and improve practice through innovation and creativity in all aspects of gerontological nursing. We encourage submission of integrative and systematic reviews; original quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods research; secondary analyses of existing data; historical works; theoretical and conceptual analyses; evidence based practice projects and other practice improvement reports; and policy analyses. All submissions must reflect consideration of IJOPN''s international readership and include explicit perspective on gerontological nursing. We particularly welcome submissions from regions of the world underrepresented in the gerontological nursing literature and from settings and situations not typically addressed in that literature. Editorial perspectives are published in each issue. Editorial perspectives are submitted by invitation only.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信