Development and Validation of a Predictive Nomogram for Patients With Myxopapillary Ependymoma: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Abhishek S Bhutada, Srijan Adhikari, Joshua A Cuoco, Austin R Hoggarth, Vaibhav M Patel, Adeolu L Olasunkanmi
{"title":"Development and Validation of a Predictive Nomogram for Patients With Myxopapillary Ependymoma: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Retrospective Cohort Analysis.","authors":"Abhishek S Bhutada, Srijan Adhikari, Joshua A Cuoco, Austin R Hoggarth, Vaibhav M Patel, Adeolu L Olasunkanmi","doi":"10.1177/21925682241270101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective Study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Myxopapillary ependymomas (MPEs) are a unique subgroup of spinal ependymomas originating from the filum terminale's ependymal glia. The 2021 WHO classification reclassified all MPEs as grade 2, recognizing their higher recurrence risk. Due to their rarity, our objective with this study is to understand MPEs' clinical course and optimal management through a large retrospective cohort analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From the years 2000 to 2020, patients with MPEs were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were run to identify variables that had a significant impact on the primary endpoint of overall survival (OS). A predictive nomogram was built to predict 5-year and 10-year survival probability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This retrospective cohort includes 1373 patients. Patients 65 years or older at diagnosis had a poorer OS (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Most patients received subtotal resection. Only 320 patients (23%) received gross total resection (GTR). Patients that received GTR had the best OS when compared against all other modalities of treatment (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Receiving radiotherapy did not affect OS in patients with MPE (<i>P</i> = 0.2). Nomogram includes patient age and treatment modalities, demonstrating acceptable accuracy in estimating the survival probability at 5-year and 10-year intervals, with a C-index of 0.80 (95% CI of 0.71 to 0.90).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the survival benefit of GTR in the treatment of patients with MPE. The role of adjuvant radiotherapy remains unclear as it did not seem to improve OS. The nomogram stratifies the risk of survival in patients with MPE based on age and treatment modality.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559927/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241270101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective Study.

Objective: Myxopapillary ependymomas (MPEs) are a unique subgroup of spinal ependymomas originating from the filum terminale's ependymal glia. The 2021 WHO classification reclassified all MPEs as grade 2, recognizing their higher recurrence risk. Due to their rarity, our objective with this study is to understand MPEs' clinical course and optimal management through a large retrospective cohort analysis.

Methods: From the years 2000 to 2020, patients with MPEs were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were run to identify variables that had a significant impact on the primary endpoint of overall survival (OS). A predictive nomogram was built to predict 5-year and 10-year survival probability.

Results: This retrospective cohort includes 1373 patients. Patients 65 years or older at diagnosis had a poorer OS (P < 0.001). Most patients received subtotal resection. Only 320 patients (23%) received gross total resection (GTR). Patients that received GTR had the best OS when compared against all other modalities of treatment (P < 0.05). Receiving radiotherapy did not affect OS in patients with MPE (P = 0.2). Nomogram includes patient age and treatment modalities, demonstrating acceptable accuracy in estimating the survival probability at 5-year and 10-year intervals, with a C-index of 0.80 (95% CI of 0.71 to 0.90).

Conclusion: This study highlights the survival benefit of GTR in the treatment of patients with MPE. The role of adjuvant radiotherapy remains unclear as it did not seem to improve OS. The nomogram stratifies the risk of survival in patients with MPE based on age and treatment modality.

肌乳头状瘤患者预测提名图的开发与验证:监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)回顾性队列分析》。
研究设计回顾性研究:肌乳头状上皮瘤(MPEs)是脊髓上皮瘤的一个独特亚组,起源于丝状终末上皮胶质。2021 年的世界卫生组织分类将所有 MPE 重新划分为 2 级,承认了其较高的复发风险。由于其罕见性,我们的研究目标是通过大型回顾性队列分析了解 MPEs 的临床过程和最佳治疗方法:方法:从 2000 年到 2020 年,我们从监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中发现了 MPE 患者。运行单变量和多变量考克斯比例危险模型,以确定对总生存期(OS)这一主要终点有显著影响的变量。建立了一个预测提名图来预测5年和10年生存概率:该回顾性队列包括 1373 名患者。确诊时年龄在65岁或以上的患者OS较差(P < 0.001)。大多数患者接受了次全切除术。只有320名患者(23%)接受了全切除术(GTR)。与所有其他治疗方式相比,接受全切除术的患者的生存期最佳(P < 0.05)。接受放疗不会影响 MPE 患者的 OS(P = 0.2)。提名图包括患者年龄和治疗方式,在估计5年和10年生存概率方面显示出可接受的准确性,C指数为0.80(95% CI为0.71至0.90):本研究强调了 GTR 对治疗 MPE 患者生存率的益处。辅助放疗的作用尚不明确,因为它似乎并不能改善OS。提名图根据年龄和治疗方式对 MPE 患者的生存风险进行了分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信