Determination of distal fibula fracture for prediction of ankle injuries

IF 1.6 3区 工程技术 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Junior Noss , John-Paul Donlon , Ramakrishnan Iyer , Jason Hallman , Jason Forman
{"title":"Determination of distal fibula fracture for prediction of ankle injuries","authors":"Junior Noss ,&nbsp;John-Paul Donlon ,&nbsp;Ramakrishnan Iyer ,&nbsp;Jason Hallman ,&nbsp;Jason Forman","doi":"10.1080/15389588.2024.2406418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study quantified the local fracture tolerance of the distal fibula. The purpose of this data is to refine the understanding of ankle fracture tolerance in the population and enhance injury prediction by computational tools.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Fracture patterns of the fibula were obtained from the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) Crash Injury Research Engineering Network (CIREN). Of 143 cases of ankle injury, 120 included fibula fracture, many of which accompanied by radiology images. The most common fibula fracture type was a Weber C fracture, which was then used as the testing target to replicate with postmortem human surrogates. Isolated distal fibulae (male and female, across a wide anthropometric range) were subjected to quasi-static lateral-medial four-point bending superimposed on axial precompression.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 20 specimens tested, 17 fractured in compression and bending, two fractured in compression, bending, and shear, and one did not fracture upon the imposed displacement. Fractures occurring outside of the target testing span were treated as right-censored data points. Fracture patterns varied among specimens, with oblique fractures being most common, followed by segmental fractures. At failure, compressive force ranged from 77 N to 370 N and bending moment from 17 Nm to 47 Nm.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>From the 19 fractured specimens, the variety of fracture patterns observed were generally consistent with the range of fibula fracture types and locations commonly observed in the field. While comparative studies with fibula specimens are largely absent from literature, comparison of this study to other long bones (radius and ulna) show that bending moment at fracture is similar. To the author’s knowledge, this is the first study to quantify the fracture tolerance of isolated distal fibulae under loading conditions representative of ankle injury mechanisms in motor vehicle collisions. By combining the results of this study with complementary results from parallel tibia-focused experiments (currently in-press), these results will aid development of tissue-level lower leg fracture prediction of human body models, thus enhancing prediction of ankle injury during safety assessment simulations. Specifically, the fracture tolerance information might generate an injury risk function to guide tissue-level injury prediction with human body models.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54422,"journal":{"name":"Traffic Injury Prevention","volume":"25 1","pages":"Pages S145-S150"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Traffic Injury Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S1538958824001358","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study quantified the local fracture tolerance of the distal fibula. The purpose of this data is to refine the understanding of ankle fracture tolerance in the population and enhance injury prediction by computational tools.

Methods

Fracture patterns of the fibula were obtained from the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) Crash Injury Research Engineering Network (CIREN). Of 143 cases of ankle injury, 120 included fibula fracture, many of which accompanied by radiology images. The most common fibula fracture type was a Weber C fracture, which was then used as the testing target to replicate with postmortem human surrogates. Isolated distal fibulae (male and female, across a wide anthropometric range) were subjected to quasi-static lateral-medial four-point bending superimposed on axial precompression.

Results

Of the 20 specimens tested, 17 fractured in compression and bending, two fractured in compression, bending, and shear, and one did not fracture upon the imposed displacement. Fractures occurring outside of the target testing span were treated as right-censored data points. Fracture patterns varied among specimens, with oblique fractures being most common, followed by segmental fractures. At failure, compressive force ranged from 77 N to 370 N and bending moment from 17 Nm to 47 Nm.

Conclusions

From the 19 fractured specimens, the variety of fracture patterns observed were generally consistent with the range of fibula fracture types and locations commonly observed in the field. While comparative studies with fibula specimens are largely absent from literature, comparison of this study to other long bones (radius and ulna) show that bending moment at fracture is similar. To the author’s knowledge, this is the first study to quantify the fracture tolerance of isolated distal fibulae under loading conditions representative of ankle injury mechanisms in motor vehicle collisions. By combining the results of this study with complementary results from parallel tibia-focused experiments (currently in-press), these results will aid development of tissue-level lower leg fracture prediction of human body models, thus enhancing prediction of ankle injury during safety assessment simulations. Specifically, the fracture tolerance information might generate an injury risk function to guide tissue-level injury prediction with human body models.
确定腓骨远端骨折以预测踝关节损伤。
研究目的本研究量化了腓骨远端局部骨折的耐受性。这些数据旨在完善对人群踝关节骨折耐受性的理解,并通过计算工具加强损伤预测:腓骨的骨折模式来自美国国家公路交通安全管理局(NHTSA)的碰撞伤害研究工程网络(CIREN)。在 143 例踝关节损伤中,有 120 例包括腓骨骨折,其中许多还附有放射学图像。最常见的腓骨骨折类型是韦伯 C 型骨折,然后将其作为测试目标,用死后人体替代物进行复制。对孤立的远端腓骨(男性和女性,人体测量范围广泛)进行准静态外侧-内侧四点弯曲并叠加轴向预压:在接受测试的 20 个试样中,17 个在压缩和弯曲时断裂,2 个在压缩、弯曲和剪切时断裂,1 个在施加位移时未断裂。在目标测试跨度之外发生的断裂被视为右删减数据点。不同试样的断裂模式各不相同,最常见的是斜向断裂,其次是分段断裂。破坏时的压缩力从 77 牛米到 370 牛米不等,弯曲力矩从 17 牛米到 47 牛米不等:从 19 个骨折标本中观察到的各种骨折形态与现场常见的腓骨骨折类型和位置范围基本一致。虽然文献中基本上没有关于腓骨标本的比较研究,但本研究与其他长骨(桡骨和尺骨)的比较表明,骨折时的弯矩是相似的。据作者所知,这是第一项量化孤立远端腓骨在代表机动车碰撞中踝关节损伤机制的加载条件下的骨折耐受性的研究。通过将本研究结果与以胫骨为重点的平行实验(目前正在进行中)的补充结果相结合,这些结果将有助于开发人体模型的组织级小腿骨折预测,从而在安全评估模拟中加强对踝关节损伤的预测。具体来说,骨折耐受性信息可生成损伤风险函数,以指导人体模型的组织级损伤预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Traffic Injury Prevention
Traffic Injury Prevention PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The purpose of Traffic Injury Prevention is to bridge the disciplines of medicine, engineering, public health and traffic safety in order to foster the science of traffic injury prevention. The archival journal focuses on research, interventions and evaluations within the areas of traffic safety, crash causation, injury prevention and treatment. General topics within the journal''s scope are driver behavior, road infrastructure, emerging crash avoidance technologies, crash and injury epidemiology, alcohol and drugs, impact injury biomechanics, vehicle crashworthiness, occupant restraints, pedestrian safety, evaluation of interventions, economic consequences and emergency and clinical care with specific application to traffic injury prevention. The journal includes full length papers, review articles, case studies, brief technical notes and commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信