Indication-based analysis of laser interstitial thermal therapy: a propensity score-matched comparison of outcomes for brain tumor versus epilepsy indications.

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Andrew M Miller, Shane Shahrestani, Michelot Michel, John S Yu, Adam Mamelak
{"title":"Indication-based analysis of laser interstitial thermal therapy: a propensity score-matched comparison of outcomes for brain tumor versus epilepsy indications.","authors":"Andrew M Miller, Shane Shahrestani, Michelot Michel, John S Yu, Adam Mamelak","doi":"10.3171/2024.8.FOCUS24441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is a minimally invasive procedure used to ablate abnormal tissue in a targeted fashion. It is most commonly used to treat epileptic foci, brain tumors, and radiation necrosis. This study aimed to compare immediate postoperative outcomes between these indications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study analyzed clinical data from the Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) from 2016 to 2019 and identified 2234 patients who underwent LITT procedures using ICD-10 codes. The authors analyzed patient demographics, complications, discharge disposition, readmission rates, and mortality. Following propensity score matching, 317 patients treated for epilepsy and 323 patients treated for brain tumors were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean ages were similar (epilepsy: 45.7 vs tumor: 49.0 years, p = 0.55), as were the proportions of female patients (epilepsy: 45.4% vs tumor: 52.9%, p = 0.83), all-payer costs (p = 0.81), income quartiles (p = 0.58), insurance types (p = 0.70), frailty rates (p = 0.85), and comorbid disease burdens as assessed by ECI score (p = 0.73). No significant differences were observed in rates of hemorrhage (p = 0.1), pulmonary embolism (p = 0.32), or infection (p = 0.16). However, the tumor cohort had higher rates of deep vein thrombosis (3.4% vs < 3.15%, p = 0.045), nonroutine discharge (26.6% vs 16.4%, p = 0.04), and 1-year hospital readmission (32.5% vs 18.6%, p = 0.006). One-year mortality rates were similar (tumor: 3.4% vs epilepsy: < 3.15%, p = 0.08).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While postoperative complications and 1-year mortality rates were similar among patients undergoing LITT for epilepsy and brain tumors, the tumor cohort experienced higher rates of deep vein thrombosis, nonroutine discharge, and 1-year hospital readmission.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.8.FOCUS24441","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is a minimally invasive procedure used to ablate abnormal tissue in a targeted fashion. It is most commonly used to treat epileptic foci, brain tumors, and radiation necrosis. This study aimed to compare immediate postoperative outcomes between these indications.

Methods: This study analyzed clinical data from the Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) from 2016 to 2019 and identified 2234 patients who underwent LITT procedures using ICD-10 codes. The authors analyzed patient demographics, complications, discharge disposition, readmission rates, and mortality. Following propensity score matching, 317 patients treated for epilepsy and 323 patients treated for brain tumors were compared.

Results: The mean ages were similar (epilepsy: 45.7 vs tumor: 49.0 years, p = 0.55), as were the proportions of female patients (epilepsy: 45.4% vs tumor: 52.9%, p = 0.83), all-payer costs (p = 0.81), income quartiles (p = 0.58), insurance types (p = 0.70), frailty rates (p = 0.85), and comorbid disease burdens as assessed by ECI score (p = 0.73). No significant differences were observed in rates of hemorrhage (p = 0.1), pulmonary embolism (p = 0.32), or infection (p = 0.16). However, the tumor cohort had higher rates of deep vein thrombosis (3.4% vs < 3.15%, p = 0.045), nonroutine discharge (26.6% vs 16.4%, p = 0.04), and 1-year hospital readmission (32.5% vs 18.6%, p = 0.006). One-year mortality rates were similar (tumor: 3.4% vs epilepsy: < 3.15%, p = 0.08).

Conclusions: While postoperative complications and 1-year mortality rates were similar among patients undergoing LITT for epilepsy and brain tumors, the tumor cohort experienced higher rates of deep vein thrombosis, nonroutine discharge, and 1-year hospital readmission.

基于适应症的激光间质热疗分析:脑肿瘤与癫痫适应症疗效的倾向得分匹配比较。
目的:激光间质热疗法(LITT)是一种微创手术,用于有针对性地消融异常组织。它最常用于治疗癫痫灶、脑肿瘤和放射性坏死。本研究旨在比较这些适应症的术后即时疗效:本研究分析了2016年至2019年全国再入院数据库(NRD)的临床数据,并使用ICD-10编码确定了2234名接受LITT手术的患者。作者分析了患者的人口统计学、并发症、出院处置、再入院率和死亡率。经过倾向得分匹配,对317名接受癫痫治疗的患者和323名接受脑肿瘤治疗的患者进行了比较:平均年龄相似(癫痫:45.7 岁 vs 肿瘤:49.0 岁,p = 0.55),女性患者比例相似(癫痫:45.4% vs 肿瘤:52.9%,p = 0.83),所有支付者费用相似(p = 0.81),收入四分位数相似(p = 0.58),保险类型相似(p = 0.70),虚弱率相似(p = 0.85),ECI 评分评估的合并疾病负担相似(p = 0.73)。出血率(p = 0.1)、肺栓塞率(p = 0.32)或感染率(p = 0.16)均无明显差异。然而,肿瘤患者队列中的深静脉血栓形成率(3.4% vs < 3.15%,p = 0.045)、非正常出院率(26.6% vs 16.4%,p = 0.04)和1年再入院率(32.5% vs 18.6%,p = 0.006)较高。一年的死亡率相似(肿瘤:3.4% vs 癫痫:< 3.15%,p = 0.08):结论:接受 LITT 治疗的癫痫患者和脑肿瘤患者的术后并发症和 1 年死亡率相似,但肿瘤患者的深静脉血栓形成率、非正常出院率和 1 年再入院率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信