Techno-economic assessment of an industrial prosumer with biomass investment and time varying tariffs: An Australian case study

IF 9.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Ibrahim Anwar Ibrahim , Tan Nhat Pham , Rakibuzzaman Shah , M.J. Hossain , Syed Islam
{"title":"Techno-economic assessment of an industrial prosumer with biomass investment and time varying tariffs: An Australian case study","authors":"Ibrahim Anwar Ibrahim ,&nbsp;Tan Nhat Pham ,&nbsp;Rakibuzzaman Shah ,&nbsp;M.J. Hossain ,&nbsp;Syed Islam","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper investigates the potential for a value chain framework to deliver impact through innovation across the timber manufacturing process. A new and efficient combustion technology that converts timber waste to energy is considered for this study. The framework to estimate the new energy costs and savings derived from the new technology, compared with current supply and demand scenarios, as well as the value generated by waste streams. The opportunity of selling excess energy to the grid or local area has been investigated. Two alternatives of time-varying tariffs and time-varying tariffs with biomass, are used for assessing the costs. According to the numerical results, tariff 3, with 25,000 tonnes of biomass feedstock per year, is the best option for the mill. The price efficiency index is reduced by approximately 40% compared to this option’s usual business. In addition, the investor can save the whole energy bill compared to the current business as usual. The investor could make a profit of $460,401 per year by selling energy to the grid. The annual saving is around six times higher than the savings gained using a time-varying tariff alone. However, this option requires $1,811,635 as annual life cycle cost, with a payback period of ten years. The lowest levelised cost of energy of 0.14 c/kWh is also obtained for this option.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"481 ","pages":"Article 143957"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652624034061","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper investigates the potential for a value chain framework to deliver impact through innovation across the timber manufacturing process. A new and efficient combustion technology that converts timber waste to energy is considered for this study. The framework to estimate the new energy costs and savings derived from the new technology, compared with current supply and demand scenarios, as well as the value generated by waste streams. The opportunity of selling excess energy to the grid or local area has been investigated. Two alternatives of time-varying tariffs and time-varying tariffs with biomass, are used for assessing the costs. According to the numerical results, tariff 3, with 25,000 tonnes of biomass feedstock per year, is the best option for the mill. The price efficiency index is reduced by approximately 40% compared to this option’s usual business. In addition, the investor can save the whole energy bill compared to the current business as usual. The investor could make a profit of $460,401 per year by selling energy to the grid. The annual saving is around six times higher than the savings gained using a time-varying tariff alone. However, this option requires $1,811,635 as annual life cycle cost, with a payback period of ten years. The lowest levelised cost of energy of 0.14 c/kWh is also obtained for this option.
对生物质投资和时间变化电价的工业用户进行技术经济评估:澳大利亚案例研究
本文研究了价值链框架的潜力,以通过木材生产过程中的创新产生影响。本研究考虑了一种将木材废料转化为能源的新型高效燃烧技术。与目前的供需情况相比,该框架可估算出新技术产生的新能源成本和节省的能源,以及废物流产生的价值。研究了向电网或当地出售多余能源的机会。在评估成本时,采用了两种备选方案:时变电价和生物质时变电价。根据数值结果,每年使用 25,000 吨生物质原料的电价 3 是该工厂的最佳选择。与该方案的常规业务相比,价格效率指数降低了约 40%。此外,与目前的正常业务相比,投资者可以节省全部能源费用。通过向电网出售能源,投资者每年可获利 460 401 美元。每年节省的费用约为单独使用时变电价节省费用的六倍。不过,该方案每年的生命周期成本为 1,811,635 美元,投资回收期为 10 年。该方案的平准化能源成本最低,为 0.14 c/kWh。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信