Low Energy Availability and Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Tara L. Gallant, Lauren F. Ong, Laura Wong, Michael Sparks, Ethan Wilson, Jose L. Puglisi, Valerie A. Gerriets
{"title":"Low Energy Availability and Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","authors":"Tara L. Gallant, Lauren F. Ong, Laura Wong, Michael Sparks, Ethan Wilson, Jose L. Puglisi, Valerie A. Gerriets","doi":"10.1007/s40279-024-02130-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Introduction</h3><p>Low energy availability (LEA) occurs when energy expenditure from athletic training and bodily functions exceeds caloric intake. This imbalance results in declines in athletic performance and increases the risk of injury. Relative energy deficiency in sport (REDs) is a condition that occurs when the energy deficit is severe enough to cause alterations to metabolic rate, menstrual function, immune function, bone health, protein synthesis, and cardiovascular function. Many athletes, particularly those competing in endurance, aesthetic, or weight-class sports, are adversely impacted by this condition.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objectives</h3><p>This study aims to determine the prevalence of LEA and REDs among athletes and present the first secondary analysis of the impacts of these phenomena on sports performance and risk of injury.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>This systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023469253). Literature searches were performed following PRISMA guidelines using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane online databases. Inclusion criteria were articles discussing the prevalence of LEA or REDs, the impact of LEA or REDs on athletic performance, or the impact of LEA or REDs EA on injury.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>A total of 59 studies met the inclusion criteria for this meta-analysis, and 2737 of 6118 athletes (44.7%) in 46 different studies were determined to have LEA, including 44.2% of female athletes and 49.4% of male athletes. In addition, 460 of 730 athletes (63.0%) in eight different studies were determined to be at risk of REDs. Athletes with LEA were found to have decreased run performance, training response, endurance performance, coordination, concentration, judgment, explosive power, and agility relative to athletes with normal energy availability, as well as an increased likelihood of absence from training due to illness. Studies had mixed results as to whether LEA increased the risk of injury in general. However, most studies concluded that athletes with LEA have impaired bone health and a higher risk of bone stress injuries.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Discussion</h3><p>To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review analyzing the impacts of LEA and REDs on athletic performance and risk of injury. Due to the high estimated prevalence of LEA among athletes, coaches may want to consider employing surveys such as the low energy availability in females questionnaire (LEAF-Q) to identify athletes at risk for LEA, as early identification and correction of LEA can prevent the development of symptoms of REDs, reduce the risk of impaired bone health and bone stress injuries, and help athletes optimize the performance benefits from their training.</p>","PeriodicalId":21969,"journal":{"name":"Sports Medicine","volume":"126 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-024-02130-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Low energy availability (LEA) occurs when energy expenditure from athletic training and bodily functions exceeds caloric intake. This imbalance results in declines in athletic performance and increases the risk of injury. Relative energy deficiency in sport (REDs) is a condition that occurs when the energy deficit is severe enough to cause alterations to metabolic rate, menstrual function, immune function, bone health, protein synthesis, and cardiovascular function. Many athletes, particularly those competing in endurance, aesthetic, or weight-class sports, are adversely impacted by this condition.

Objectives

This study aims to determine the prevalence of LEA and REDs among athletes and present the first secondary analysis of the impacts of these phenomena on sports performance and risk of injury.

Methods

This systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023469253). Literature searches were performed following PRISMA guidelines using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane online databases. Inclusion criteria were articles discussing the prevalence of LEA or REDs, the impact of LEA or REDs on athletic performance, or the impact of LEA or REDs EA on injury.

Results

A total of 59 studies met the inclusion criteria for this meta-analysis, and 2737 of 6118 athletes (44.7%) in 46 different studies were determined to have LEA, including 44.2% of female athletes and 49.4% of male athletes. In addition, 460 of 730 athletes (63.0%) in eight different studies were determined to be at risk of REDs. Athletes with LEA were found to have decreased run performance, training response, endurance performance, coordination, concentration, judgment, explosive power, and agility relative to athletes with normal energy availability, as well as an increased likelihood of absence from training due to illness. Studies had mixed results as to whether LEA increased the risk of injury in general. However, most studies concluded that athletes with LEA have impaired bone health and a higher risk of bone stress injuries.

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review analyzing the impacts of LEA and REDs on athletic performance and risk of injury. Due to the high estimated prevalence of LEA among athletes, coaches may want to consider employing surveys such as the low energy availability in females questionnaire (LEAF-Q) to identify athletes at risk for LEA, as early identification and correction of LEA can prevent the development of symptoms of REDs, reduce the risk of impaired bone health and bone stress injuries, and help athletes optimize the performance benefits from their training.

Abstract Image

运动中的低能量供应和相对能量不足:系统回顾与元分析
导言当运动训练和身体机能的能量消耗超过热量摄入时,就会出现低能量可用性(LEA)。这种不平衡会导致运动成绩下降,并增加受伤的风险。运动中的相对能量不足(REDs)是指当能量不足严重到足以导致新陈代谢率、月经功能、免疫功能、骨骼健康、蛋白质合成和心血管功能发生改变时出现的一种情况。本研究旨在确定 LEA 和 REDs 在运动员中的流行程度,并首次对这些现象对运动表现和受伤风险的影响进行二次分析。方法本系统综述已在 PROSPERO(CRD42023469253)上注册。按照 PRISMA 指南,使用 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 在线数据库进行文献检索。结果共有 59 项研究符合本次荟萃分析的纳入标准,46 项不同研究的 6118 名运动员中有 2737 人(44.7%)被确定患有 LEA,其中包括 44.2% 的女运动员和 49.4% 的男运动员。此外,在 8 项不同的研究中,730 名运动员中有 460 名(63.0%)被确定为有 REDs 风险。研究发现,与能量供应正常的运动员相比,患有 LEA 的运动员在跑步成绩、训练反应、耐力表现、协调性、注意力、判断力、爆发力和敏捷性方面都有所下降,而且因病缺席训练的可能性也有所增加。至于 LEA 是否会增加一般受伤的风险,研究结果不一。据我们所知,这是第一篇分析 LEA 和 RED 对运动成绩和受伤风险影响的系统综述。由于 LEA 在运动员中的估计发病率较高,教练员可能会考虑采用女性低能量可用性问卷调查(LEAF-Q)等调查方法来识别有 LEA 风险的运动员,因为早期识别和纠正 LEA 可以预防 REDs 症状的出现,降低骨健康受损和骨应力损伤的风险,并帮助运动员从训练中获得最佳表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sports Medicine
Sports Medicine 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
18.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
165
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Sports Medicine focuses on providing definitive and comprehensive review articles that interpret and evaluate current literature, aiming to offer insights into research findings in the sports medicine and exercise field. The journal covers major topics such as sports medicine and sports science, medical syndromes associated with sport and exercise, clinical medicine's role in injury prevention and treatment, exercise for rehabilitation and health, and the application of physiological and biomechanical principles to specific sports. Types of Articles: Review Articles: Definitive and comprehensive reviews that interpret and evaluate current literature to provide rationale for and application of research findings. Leading/Current Opinion Articles: Overviews of contentious or emerging issues in the field. Original Research Articles: High-quality research articles. Enhanced Features: Additional features like slide sets, videos, and animations aimed at increasing the visibility, readership, and educational value of the journal's content. Plain Language Summaries: Summaries accompanying articles to assist readers in understanding important medical advances. Peer Review Process: All manuscripts undergo peer review by international experts to ensure quality and rigor. The journal also welcomes Letters to the Editor, which will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信