Exploring Perspectives on HIV Vulnerability Communication among Transgender and Gender Diverse Patients and Primary Care Providers

IF 2.9 2区 社会学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Hill L. Wolfe, Jaclyn M. W. Hughto, Jennifer Siegel, Gemmae M. Fix, Tonia C. Poteat, Carl G. Streed, Landon D. Hughes, Em Balkan, Mari-Lynn Drainoni
{"title":"Exploring Perspectives on HIV Vulnerability Communication among Transgender and Gender Diverse Patients and Primary Care Providers","authors":"Hill L. Wolfe, Jaclyn M. W. Hughto, Jennifer Siegel, Gemmae M. Fix, Tonia C. Poteat, Carl G. Streed, Landon D. Hughes, Em Balkan, Mari-Lynn Drainoni","doi":"10.1007/s10508-024-02991-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Transgender and gender diverse (TGD) individuals represent a population with a heavy burden of HIV. Multi-level stigma encountered by TGD individuals can create significant barriers to discussing topics related to HIV prevention; however, research on communication between TGD patients and primary care providers (PCPs) about HIV vulnerability and prevention remains limited. This study used in-depth qualitative interviews with 25 TGD patients and 15 PCPs conducted in 2022 to explore perspectives on HIV vulnerability communication during primary care encounters. Overall, 14 of the TGD patients were nonbinary, genderqueer, or another gender identity; all but two participants identified as a sexual minority. The majority of PCPs (<i>n</i> = 11) were physicians. The range of years practicing medicine was between two and 39 years. Thematic analysis was used to organize codes and establish themes. Three broad themes regarding factors that facilitate communication regarding HIV vulnerability were identified: (1) focusing on behaviors over identities, (2) conveying impartiality, and (3) acknowledging individuality among TGD patients. Findings corroborate earlier research that identified strengths in providers refraining from behavior-based assumptions tied to a patient’s gender identity and sexual orientation and conveying impartial and nonjudgmental attitudes when discussing behaviors that can increase HIV vulnerability. Additionally, these findings underscore the significance of recognizing that, within the TGD community, all persons have unique circumstances, preferences, and needs. Future work should continue to explore the dynamics of HIV vulnerability and prevention discussions, especially among TGD individuals from diverse backgrounds and regions, to identify strategies for strengthening patient–provider communication and reducing vulnerability to HIV.</p>","PeriodicalId":8327,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Sexual Behavior","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Sexual Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-024-02991-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transgender and gender diverse (TGD) individuals represent a population with a heavy burden of HIV. Multi-level stigma encountered by TGD individuals can create significant barriers to discussing topics related to HIV prevention; however, research on communication between TGD patients and primary care providers (PCPs) about HIV vulnerability and prevention remains limited. This study used in-depth qualitative interviews with 25 TGD patients and 15 PCPs conducted in 2022 to explore perspectives on HIV vulnerability communication during primary care encounters. Overall, 14 of the TGD patients were nonbinary, genderqueer, or another gender identity; all but two participants identified as a sexual minority. The majority of PCPs (n = 11) were physicians. The range of years practicing medicine was between two and 39 years. Thematic analysis was used to organize codes and establish themes. Three broad themes regarding factors that facilitate communication regarding HIV vulnerability were identified: (1) focusing on behaviors over identities, (2) conveying impartiality, and (3) acknowledging individuality among TGD patients. Findings corroborate earlier research that identified strengths in providers refraining from behavior-based assumptions tied to a patient’s gender identity and sexual orientation and conveying impartial and nonjudgmental attitudes when discussing behaviors that can increase HIV vulnerability. Additionally, these findings underscore the significance of recognizing that, within the TGD community, all persons have unique circumstances, preferences, and needs. Future work should continue to explore the dynamics of HIV vulnerability and prevention discussions, especially among TGD individuals from diverse backgrounds and regions, to identify strategies for strengthening patient–provider communication and reducing vulnerability to HIV.

探索变性和性别多元化患者与初级保健提供者之间关于艾滋病毒易感性沟通的观点
变性者和性别多元化者 (TGD) 是艾滋病毒感染率较高的人群。变性人和性别多元化者所遭遇的多层次污名可能会对讨论与艾滋病预防相关的话题造成重大障碍;然而,有关变性人和性别多元化者患者与初级保健提供者(PCPs)之间就艾滋病易感性和预防进行沟通的研究仍然有限。本研究在 2022 年对 25 名 TGD 患者和 15 名初级保健医生进行了深入的定性访谈,以探讨在初级保健过程中有关艾滋病易感性沟通的观点。总体而言,14 名 TGD 患者为非二元性、变性人或其他性别身份;除两名参与者外,其他参与者均被认定为性少数群体。大多数初级保健医生(n = 11)是内科医生。他们的行医年限从 2 年到 39 年不等。专题分析用于组织代码和确立主题。确定了三个广泛的主题,涉及促进艾滋病易感性沟通的因素:(1) 关注行为而非身份,(2) 传达公正性,(3) 承认 TGD 患者的个性。研究结果证实了之前的研究,这些研究发现了医疗服务提供者的优势,即在讨论可能增加艾滋病易感性的行为时,避免基于患者性别认同和性取向的行为假设,并传达公正和非批判性的态度。此外,这些发现强调了认识到在 TGD 群体中,所有人都有独特的情况、偏好和需求的重要性。未来的工作应继续探索 HIV 易感性和预防讨论的动态,尤其是来自不同背景和地区的 TGD 群体,以确定加强患者与提供者沟通和降低 HIV 易感性的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
13.20%
发文量
299
期刊介绍: The official publication of the International Academy of Sex Research, the journal is dedicated to the dissemination of information in the field of sexual science, broadly defined. Contributions consist of empirical research (both quantitative and qualitative), theoretical reviews and essays, clinical case reports, letters to the editor, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信