Causes for overestimation of the moisture recycling in an alpine meadow ecosystem of the Shule River Basin, Tibetan Plateau, China

IF 5.9 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Hang Liu , Liangju Zhao , Ninglian Wang , Zihan Zhang , Cong Xie , Xiying Dong , Xiaohong Liu , Lixin Wang
{"title":"Causes for overestimation of the moisture recycling in an alpine meadow ecosystem of the Shule River Basin, Tibetan Plateau, China","authors":"Hang Liu ,&nbsp;Liangju Zhao ,&nbsp;Ninglian Wang ,&nbsp;Zihan Zhang ,&nbsp;Cong Xie ,&nbsp;Xiying Dong ,&nbsp;Xiaohong Liu ,&nbsp;Lixin Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Terrestrial moisture recycling is an essential hydrological component and a significant source of the atmosphere’s humidity budget in arid and semi-arid inland regions. Investigations on moisture recycling using the stable hydrogen and oxygen isotopes is currently a focal point in hydrologic research. However, the direct quantification of recycling ratio based on isotopic composition of evapotranspiration vapor is lacking. So, this causes challenges to compare studies, based in the same region and time period but with different methodologies. In this study, we measured the isotopic compositions of evapotranspiration vapor (δ<sup>18</sup>O<em><sub>ET</sub></em>/δD<em><sub>ET</sub></em>) from June to September 2018 in an alpine meadow ecosystem at the Shule River Basin by combining the Keeling plot model and in-situ chamber measurement. Using this data, the moisture recycled rate (<em>mrr</em>) was assessed based on the two-component (Model A) and three-component isotopic mixing models (Model B), respectively. Based on Model A and δ<sup>18</sup>O<em><sub>ET</sub></em>, the analysis revealed that the mean recycled rate for the entire observation period was 35 %, while it was 26 % during the westerly period (the months dominated by the north branch of prevailing westerlies) and 44 % during the monsoon period (when subtropical moisture from the Indian monsoon penetrated the region). The recycled rate based on Model A and δD<em><sub>ET</sub></em> was slightly larger with a mean value of 41 % during the entire observation period. The recycled rate based on Model B was also significantly higher in comparison with Model A, while the causes for this difference could be the assumption of substituting xylem water for transpiration vapor and the plant water source δD offset. The contribution of recycled moisture was notable lower for heavy rainfall comparing with light rainfall. Our findings provided a new perspective for the investigations of alpine meadow ecosystem hydrological processes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"645 ","pages":"Article 132226"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169424016226","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Terrestrial moisture recycling is an essential hydrological component and a significant source of the atmosphere’s humidity budget in arid and semi-arid inland regions. Investigations on moisture recycling using the stable hydrogen and oxygen isotopes is currently a focal point in hydrologic research. However, the direct quantification of recycling ratio based on isotopic composition of evapotranspiration vapor is lacking. So, this causes challenges to compare studies, based in the same region and time period but with different methodologies. In this study, we measured the isotopic compositions of evapotranspiration vapor (δ18OET/δDET) from June to September 2018 in an alpine meadow ecosystem at the Shule River Basin by combining the Keeling plot model and in-situ chamber measurement. Using this data, the moisture recycled rate (mrr) was assessed based on the two-component (Model A) and three-component isotopic mixing models (Model B), respectively. Based on Model A and δ18OET, the analysis revealed that the mean recycled rate for the entire observation period was 35 %, while it was 26 % during the westerly period (the months dominated by the north branch of prevailing westerlies) and 44 % during the monsoon period (when subtropical moisture from the Indian monsoon penetrated the region). The recycled rate based on Model A and δDET was slightly larger with a mean value of 41 % during the entire observation period. The recycled rate based on Model B was also significantly higher in comparison with Model A, while the causes for this difference could be the assumption of substituting xylem water for transpiration vapor and the plant water source δD offset. The contribution of recycled moisture was notable lower for heavy rainfall comparing with light rainfall. Our findings provided a new perspective for the investigations of alpine meadow ecosystem hydrological processes.
高估中国青藏高原疏勒河流域高寒草甸生态系统水分循环的原因
陆地水分循环是干旱和半干旱内陆地区重要的水文组成部分,也是大气湿度预算的重要来源。利用稳定的氢和氧同位素对水汽循环进行研究是目前水文研究的一个重点。然而,基于蒸发蒸腾水汽同位素组成的水汽循环比率的直接量化研究还很缺乏。因此,这给比较基于同一地区和时间段但采用不同方法的研究带来了挑战。在本研究中,我们结合基林图模型和原位室测量,测量了2018年6月至9月疏勒河流域高寒草甸生态系统蒸散蒸气的同位素组成(δ18OET/δDET)。利用这些数据,分别根据两组分(模型A)和三组分同位素混合模型(模型B)评估了水分循环率(mrr)。根据模式 A 和 δ18OET,分析表明整个观测期间的平均再循环率为 35%,而在西风期(盛行西风的北支主导的月份)为 26%,在季风期(印度季风的副热带湿气渗透该地区)为 44%。基于模式 A 和 δDET 的再循环率稍高,在整个观测期间的平均值为 41%。基于模型 B 的循环率也明显高于模型 A,造成这种差异的原因可能是用木质部水分代替蒸腾水汽的假设和植物水源 δD 偏移。与小雨相比,大雨中循环水分的贡献率明显较低。我们的研究结果为研究高山草甸生态系统的水文过程提供了一个新的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrology
Journal of Hydrology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1309
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信