Fostering patients' participation in oncology research by developing psychological empowerment and a sense of community.

Charlotte Bauquier, Myriam Pannard, Amandine Andrin, Julien Biaudet, Sophie Parnalland, Sandrine Dabakuyo, Francis Guillemin, Gwenaëlle Paret, Guillemette Jacob, Marie Préau
{"title":"Fostering patients' participation in oncology research by developing psychological empowerment and a sense of community.","authors":"Charlotte Bauquier, Myriam Pannard, Amandine Andrin, Julien Biaudet, Sophie Parnalland, Sandrine Dabakuyo, Francis Guillemin, Gwenaëlle Paret, Guillemette Jacob, Marie Préau","doi":"10.1016/j.jeph.2024.202781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>A \"patient-researcher\" training intervention was designed to improve participants' empowerment by building on their level of critical health literacy and to build a trustful partnership between participants and researchers, with the longer-term objective of co-constructing a community-based research project. The participants in the training intervention were recruited through the collaborative research platform \"Seintinelles\". This training intervention was aimed at patients or former patients suffering from cancer. The study's objective is to identify intervention's elements that appear to be relevant and those that should be improved for future implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is descriptive research in the form of a case study. A questionnaire (post-intervention) and logbook were designed to analyze the implementation of patient-researcher training.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results suggest that the intervention should be flexible to adapt content to formal and informal exchanges. Participants were satisfied, although the intervention did not completely meet their expectations. Following the intervention, most participants felt able to participate in a research study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>At the end of this analysis, we can conclude that the 'patient-researcher' training intervention fulfilled its two objectives. First, it provided the knowledge and skills necessary for the implementation of a community-based research study and helped participants feel that they could take part in the different stages of such a study. Second, it initiated the construction of an alliance between 'lived experience' experts and scientific experts.</p>","PeriodicalId":517428,"journal":{"name":"Journal of epidemiology and population health","volume":"72 6","pages":"202781"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of epidemiology and population health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeph.2024.202781","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: A "patient-researcher" training intervention was designed to improve participants' empowerment by building on their level of critical health literacy and to build a trustful partnership between participants and researchers, with the longer-term objective of co-constructing a community-based research project. The participants in the training intervention were recruited through the collaborative research platform "Seintinelles". This training intervention was aimed at patients or former patients suffering from cancer. The study's objective is to identify intervention's elements that appear to be relevant and those that should be improved for future implementation.

Methods: This study is descriptive research in the form of a case study. A questionnaire (post-intervention) and logbook were designed to analyze the implementation of patient-researcher training.

Results: Results suggest that the intervention should be flexible to adapt content to formal and informal exchanges. Participants were satisfied, although the intervention did not completely meet their expectations. Following the intervention, most participants felt able to participate in a research study.

Conclusion: At the end of this analysis, we can conclude that the 'patient-researcher' training intervention fulfilled its two objectives. First, it provided the knowledge and skills necessary for the implementation of a community-based research study and helped participants feel that they could take part in the different stages of such a study. Second, it initiated the construction of an alliance between 'lived experience' experts and scientific experts.

通过增强心理能力和社区意识,促进患者参与肿瘤研究。
目标:设计了一项 "患者-研究者 "培训干预措施,旨在通过提高参与者的关键健康知识水平来增强他们的能力,并在参与者和研究者之间建立一种相互信任的伙伴关系,其长期目标是共同构建一个以社区为基础的研究项目。培训干预的参与者是通过合作研究平台 "Seintinelles "招募的。培训干预的对象是癌症患者或曾经的癌症患者。本研究的目的是确定干预措施中哪些因素似乎具有相关性,哪些因素应在今后的实施过程中加以改进:本研究是一项个案研究形式的描述性研究。设计了调查问卷(干预后)和日志来分析患者研究者培训的实施情况:结果表明,干预措施应具有灵活性,以适应正式和非正式交流的内容。虽然干预措施没有完全达到参与者的期望,但他们对干预措施表示满意。干预结束后,大多数参与者认为自己有能力参与研究:经过分析,我们可以得出这样的结论:"病人-研究者 "培训干预措施实现了两个目标。首先,它提供了开展以社区为基础的调查研究所需的知识和技能,并帮助参与者感到他们可以参与此类研究的不同阶段。其次,它启动了 "生活经验 "专家与科学专家之间的联盟建设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信