Determination of a 'point of no return' in refractory chronic subdural hematomas: A case report and review of the literature.

Medicine international Pub Date : 2024-10-10 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.3892/mi.2024.199
Alexandros G Brotis, George Fotakopoulos, Vasiliki Epameinondas Georgakopoulou, Adamantios Kalogeras, Theodosis Spiliotopoulos, Ioannis Ioannidis, Kostas N Fountas
{"title":"Determination of a 'point of no return' in refractory chronic subdural hematomas: A case report and review of the literature.","authors":"Alexandros G Brotis, George Fotakopoulos, Vasiliki Epameinondas Georgakopoulou, Adamantios Kalogeras, Theodosis Spiliotopoulos, Ioannis Ioannidis, Kostas N Fountas","doi":"10.3892/mi.2024.199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recurrence following the surgical evacuation of a chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) occurs in up to 33% of cases. Several clinical and radiologic factors have been identified that are associated with the recurrence of hematoma. However, the optimal treatment for recurrent CSDH has not yet been determined. The present study, based on a case report, reviews the predictors and treatment options for refractory CSDHs. An 85-year-old male patient presented with a symptomatic bilateral CSDH. The hematoma was initially removed through a burr hole and closed drainage system, resulting in clinical improvement and in the radiographic resolution of the hematoma. At the first recurrence, steroids were administered and the hematoma was re-evacuated. After 1 month, the patient returned comatose due to a massive right subdural hematoma and was treated with an ipsilateral craniotomy and a membranectomy. After 2 days, the patient succumbed due to massive intraparenchymal bleeding. The treatment of refractory CSDHs is challenging. The failure of brain re-expansion and senile atrophy appear to be the key predictors of recurrence. Patients who are at high-risk need to be identified promptly and treated with a multidisciplinary approach that considers adjuvant medications, middle meningeal artery embolization and repeat hematoma evacuation, probably with a membranectomy and an endoscope.</p>","PeriodicalId":74161,"journal":{"name":"Medicine international","volume":"4 6","pages":"75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11526243/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3892/mi.2024.199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recurrence following the surgical evacuation of a chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) occurs in up to 33% of cases. Several clinical and radiologic factors have been identified that are associated with the recurrence of hematoma. However, the optimal treatment for recurrent CSDH has not yet been determined. The present study, based on a case report, reviews the predictors and treatment options for refractory CSDHs. An 85-year-old male patient presented with a symptomatic bilateral CSDH. The hematoma was initially removed through a burr hole and closed drainage system, resulting in clinical improvement and in the radiographic resolution of the hematoma. At the first recurrence, steroids were administered and the hematoma was re-evacuated. After 1 month, the patient returned comatose due to a massive right subdural hematoma and was treated with an ipsilateral craniotomy and a membranectomy. After 2 days, the patient succumbed due to massive intraparenchymal bleeding. The treatment of refractory CSDHs is challenging. The failure of brain re-expansion and senile atrophy appear to be the key predictors of recurrence. Patients who are at high-risk need to be identified promptly and treated with a multidisciplinary approach that considers adjuvant medications, middle meningeal artery embolization and repeat hematoma evacuation, probably with a membranectomy and an endoscope.

确定难治性慢性硬膜下血肿的 "不归点":病例报告和文献综述。
慢性硬膜下血肿(CSDH)手术清除后的复发率高达 33%。目前已发现与血肿复发相关的几个临床和放射学因素。然而,复发性 CSDH 的最佳治疗方法尚未确定。本研究基于一份病例报告,回顾了难治性 CSDH 的预测因素和治疗方案。一名 85 岁的男性患者出现了双侧 CSDH 症状。最初通过钻孔和封闭引流系统清除血肿,临床症状有所改善,血肿也在影像学上消退。血肿首次复发时,患者接受了类固醇治疗,并对血肿进行了再次抽吸。1 个月后,患者因右侧硬膜下大量血肿再次昏迷,接受了同侧开颅手术和脑膜切除术。2 天后,患者因大量脑实质内出血而死亡。难治性 CSDH 的治疗具有挑战性。大脑再扩张失败和老年性萎缩似乎是预测复发的关键因素。需要及时发现高危患者,并采用多学科方法进行治疗,其中包括辅助药物、脑膜中动脉栓塞和重复血肿清除,可能还需要进行脑膜切除术和内窥镜。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信