Long-term complications of extracranial pericranial flaps in skull base reconstruction.

Abstract

Purpose of review: Nasoseptal flaps are a frequently used and well characterized means of reconstruction following endoscopic endonasal approach surgery (EEA). However, there are alternative means of reconstruction, including the extracranial pericranial flap (ePCF), that while used infrequently fulfill a specialized need in larger or salvage reconstructions. This review aims to better characterize long-term outcomes using ePCF where there is currently a paucity of objective data on use and outcomes.

Recent findings: A traditional pericranial flap involves elevating and rotating the flap through a craniotomy defect to reconstruct defects of the ventral skull base. The ePCF is implemented without performing a craniotomy, and instead tunnels the flap through a bony opening created at the level of the nasion. This review presents outcomes in a large single-center cohort of patients with ePCFs to better characterize the short- and long-term success, risks, and complications of this reconstructive method.

Summary: Long-term follow-up demonstrates that obstruction of the frontal sinus outflow may occur but rarely requires surgical intervention. ePCF are a reasonable alternative to consider in cases where local tissue would be insufficient, is not available, or has already failed. There is a low risk of flap complications.