Integrating existing and novel methods to understand organizational context: A case study of an academic-public health department partnership

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Larry R. Hearld , Madeline C. Pratt , Donna Smith , Mariel Parman , Rendi Murphree , Kevin P. Michaels , Stephanie Woods-Crawford , Aadia I. Rana , Lynn T. Matthews
{"title":"Integrating existing and novel methods to understand organizational context: A case study of an academic-public health department partnership","authors":"Larry R. Hearld ,&nbsp;Madeline C. Pratt ,&nbsp;Donna Smith ,&nbsp;Mariel Parman ,&nbsp;Rendi Murphree ,&nbsp;Kevin P. Michaels ,&nbsp;Stephanie Woods-Crawford ,&nbsp;Aadia I. Rana ,&nbsp;Lynn T. Matthews","doi":"10.1016/j.annepidem.2024.10.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>In this manuscript we illustrate how implementation science (IS) researchers and practitioners can deploy and integrate existing and novel methods to develop a more comprehensive understanding of organizational context, particularly organizational routines and processes, to inform adaptation and implementation of evidence-based interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The work reported here was part of a broader investigation of how to adapt and implement a three-component combination intervention in a county health department in Mobile, Alabama. Based on pre-implementation efforts to assess local context and barriers to implementation, we first describe three approaches that can be effectively used to elucidate organizational routines and processes, followed by a description of how these approaches were applied in our study. We conclude with a discussion of lessons learned and recommendations for how these approaches can be applied and improved upon by other IS researchers.</div></div><div><h3>Results/Conclusions</h3><div>Multiple methods used iteratively and collaboratively with implementation partners can enhance our understanding of nuanced organizational routines and better inform efforts to adapt and implement evidence-based interventions in complex organizational settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50767,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Epidemiology","volume":"100 ","pages":"Pages 34-41"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1047279724002473","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

In this manuscript we illustrate how implementation science (IS) researchers and practitioners can deploy and integrate existing and novel methods to develop a more comprehensive understanding of organizational context, particularly organizational routines and processes, to inform adaptation and implementation of evidence-based interventions.

Methods

The work reported here was part of a broader investigation of how to adapt and implement a three-component combination intervention in a county health department in Mobile, Alabama. Based on pre-implementation efforts to assess local context and barriers to implementation, we first describe three approaches that can be effectively used to elucidate organizational routines and processes, followed by a description of how these approaches were applied in our study. We conclude with a discussion of lessons learned and recommendations for how these approaches can be applied and improved upon by other IS researchers.

Results/Conclusions

Multiple methods used iteratively and collaboratively with implementation partners can enhance our understanding of nuanced organizational routines and better inform efforts to adapt and implement evidence-based interventions in complex organizational settings.
整合现有方法和新方法,了解组织背景:学术界与公共卫生部门合作的案例研究。
目的:在本手稿中,我们阐述了实施科学(IS)研究人员和从业人员如何部署和整合现有的和新颖的方法,以更全面地了解组织背景,特别是组织常规和流程,从而为调整和实施循证干预措施提供依据:本文所报告的工作是对阿拉巴马州莫比尔市一个县级卫生部门如何调整和实施由三部分组成的综合干预措施的广泛调查的一部分。在实施前评估当地环境和实施障碍的基础上,我们首先介绍了可有效用于阐明组织常规和流程的三种方法,然后介绍了在我们的研究中如何应用这些方法。最后,我们讨论了吸取的经验教训,并就其他信息系统研究人员如何应用和改进这些方法提出了建议:与实施伙伴合作,反复使用多种方法,可以加深我们对细微的组织常规的理解,为在复杂的组织环境中调整和实施循证干预措施提供更好的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Epidemiology
Annals of Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
1.80%
发文量
207
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The journal emphasizes the application of epidemiologic methods to issues that affect the distribution and determinants of human illness in diverse contexts. Its primary focus is on chronic and acute conditions of diverse etiologies and of major importance to clinical medicine, public health, and health care delivery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信