Conceptualizing Domestic Violence Within Clinical Documentation.

IF 2.2 Q1 NURSING
Global Qualitative Nursing Research Pub Date : 2024-10-14 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23333936241271165
María Atiénzar-Prieto, Shannon Dhollande, Silke Meyer, Diksha Sapkota, Karen-Ann Clarke
{"title":"Conceptualizing Domestic Violence Within Clinical Documentation.","authors":"María Atiénzar-Prieto, Shannon Dhollande, Silke Meyer, Diksha Sapkota, Karen-Ann Clarke","doi":"10.1177/23333936241271165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Domestic and family violence (DFV) is a global issue with significant impacts on victim-survivors. The emergency department (ED) serves as the initial point of contact for victim-survivors. Given the significant role that clinical notes play in the management of patients and the communication between healthcare professionals, understanding how healthcare practitioners describe and document abuse reported in emergency settings is crucial. Yet, there remains a gap in understanding how health professional document DFV in the medical records of women presenting to the ED. Therefore, this qualitative descriptive study explored how DFV is documented in patient records of women presenting to the ED. Clinical notes from healthcare workers, including medical practitioners, nurses, social workers, mental health clinicians and ambulance officers, were qualitatively analyzed. Overall, the study included 43 presentations from 32 women (aged 18-56 years old) who visited a regional ED, during which instances of DFV were noted. An inductive content analysis resulted in the identification of four categories, including (a) DFV articulated in direct speech, (b) Unambiguous DFV, (c) Unconfirmed DFV, and (d) Problematic relationship. Although most references to DFV in the clinical notes included direct quotations from the patient's descriptions of abuse or were documented unambiguously by healthcare professionals, a notable number of clinical notes exhibited a degree of caution or reluctance to acknowledge DFV dynamics when describing these events. These findings support the need for sustained and consistent professional training among healthcare professionals concerning the identification, documentation, and response to disclosures, suspicions, and allegations of DFV to better support victim-survivors presenting to the ED and other hospital settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":45940,"journal":{"name":"Global Qualitative Nursing Research","volume":"11 ","pages":"23333936241271165"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11526218/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Qualitative Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23333936241271165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Domestic and family violence (DFV) is a global issue with significant impacts on victim-survivors. The emergency department (ED) serves as the initial point of contact for victim-survivors. Given the significant role that clinical notes play in the management of patients and the communication between healthcare professionals, understanding how healthcare practitioners describe and document abuse reported in emergency settings is crucial. Yet, there remains a gap in understanding how health professional document DFV in the medical records of women presenting to the ED. Therefore, this qualitative descriptive study explored how DFV is documented in patient records of women presenting to the ED. Clinical notes from healthcare workers, including medical practitioners, nurses, social workers, mental health clinicians and ambulance officers, were qualitatively analyzed. Overall, the study included 43 presentations from 32 women (aged 18-56 years old) who visited a regional ED, during which instances of DFV were noted. An inductive content analysis resulted in the identification of four categories, including (a) DFV articulated in direct speech, (b) Unambiguous DFV, (c) Unconfirmed DFV, and (d) Problematic relationship. Although most references to DFV in the clinical notes included direct quotations from the patient's descriptions of abuse or were documented unambiguously by healthcare professionals, a notable number of clinical notes exhibited a degree of caution or reluctance to acknowledge DFV dynamics when describing these events. These findings support the need for sustained and consistent professional training among healthcare professionals concerning the identification, documentation, and response to disclosures, suspicions, and allegations of DFV to better support victim-survivors presenting to the ED and other hospital settings.

在临床文件中将家庭暴力概念化。
家庭暴力 (DFV) 是一个全球性问题,对受害者-幸存者产生了重大影响。急诊科(ED)是受害者-幸存者的最初接触点。鉴于临床记录在患者管理和医护人员之间的交流中发挥着重要作用,了解医护人员如何描述和记录急诊环境中报告的虐待事件至关重要。然而,在了解医护人员如何在急诊室女性患者的病历中记录 DFV 方面仍然存在空白。因此,本定性描述性研究探讨了急诊室就诊女性的病历中是如何记录 DFV 的。研究人员对医护人员(包括执业医师、护士、社工、心理健康临床医师和救护人员)的临床记录进行了定性分析。总的来说,这项研究包括了 32 名女性(年龄在 18-56 岁之间)到地区急诊室就诊的 43 个病例,期间记录了 DFV 事件。通过归纳内容分析,确定了四个类别,包括:(a)直接言语表达的 DFV;(b)不明确的 DFV;(c)未经证实的 DFV;以及(d)有问题的关系。尽管临床笔记中提及 DFV 时,大多直接引用了患者对虐待的描述,或由医护人员明确记录,但仍有相当数量的临床笔记在描述这些事件时表现出一定程度的谨慎或不愿承认 DFV 动态。这些研究结果证明,有必要对医护人员进行持续、一致的专业培训,培训内容涉及如何识别、记录和应对 DFV 的披露、怀疑和指控,以便更好地为急诊室和其他医院环境中的受害者幸存者提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
41
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Qualitative Nursing Research (GQNR) is a ground breaking, international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal focusing on qualitative research in fields relevant to nursing and other health professionals world-wide. The journal specializes in topics related to nursing practice, responses to health and illness, health promotion, and health care delivery. GQNR will publish research articles using qualitative methods and qualitatively-driven mixed-method designs as well as meta-syntheses and articles focused on methodological development. Special sections include Ethics, Methodological Development, Advancing Theory/Metasynthesis, Establishing Evidence, and Application to Practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信