Toxicity of the FOLFOX-6 regimen, with or without 5-fluorouracil bolus, in metastatic colorectal cancer.

IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
María Teresa Garrido Martínez, María Rodríguez Jorge, Ignacio García Giménez, María Isabel Guzmán Ramos, Salvador Grutzmancher Sáiz, Victoria Aviñó Tarazona
{"title":"Toxicity of the FOLFOX-6 regimen, with or without 5-fluorouracil bolus, in metastatic colorectal cancer.","authors":"María Teresa Garrido Martínez, María Rodríguez Jorge, Ignacio García Giménez, María Isabel Guzmán Ramos, Salvador Grutzmancher Sáiz, Victoria Aviñó Tarazona","doi":"10.1016/j.farma.2024.09.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Standard treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer includes oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil in continuous infusion. Although FOLFOX-6 is the reference combination, it is aggressive and has high toxicity. Variants such as the TTD regimen, which does not include folinic acid or 5-fluorouracil bolus, are used. This study evaluates the toxicity of FOLFOX-6 and TTD in first line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer and its effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Retrospective observational study with patients who started treatment with FOLFOX-6 and TTD, for three years. Demographic and clinical data were collected (age, sex, chronic pathologies, molecular profile, laterality, ECOG classification and stage), as well as treatment variables (previous adjuvant chemotherapy, intentionality, number of cycles, duration and pharmacogenetic aspects) and toxicity. Objective response rate and progression-free survival were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 71 patients, 35 treated with FOLFOX-6 and 36 with TTD. Both groups showed similar overall toxicity profiles. FOLFOX-6 had a higher incidence of neutropenia (46% vs. 8%; p < 0.01) and mucositis (51% vs. 22%; p < 0.013). In addition, there were more treatment delays (40% vs. 11%; p < 0.05) and 5-fluorouracil dose reductions (22% vs. 14%; p < 0.05) in the FOLFOX-6 group. Deaths due to toxicity were only recorded in the FOLFOX-6 group. Effectiveness was similar in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The TTD regimen could be a beneficial first-line option for metastatic colorectal cancer, with lower toxicity and effectiveness comparable to FOLFOX-6. It is a safe alternative for elderly or frail patients, suitable for reduced-dose 5-fluorouracil regimen with oxaliplatin.</p>","PeriodicalId":45860,"journal":{"name":"FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.farma.2024.09.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Standard treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer includes oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil in continuous infusion. Although FOLFOX-6 is the reference combination, it is aggressive and has high toxicity. Variants such as the TTD regimen, which does not include folinic acid or 5-fluorouracil bolus, are used. This study evaluates the toxicity of FOLFOX-6 and TTD in first line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer and its effectiveness.

Method: Retrospective observational study with patients who started treatment with FOLFOX-6 and TTD, for three years. Demographic and clinical data were collected (age, sex, chronic pathologies, molecular profile, laterality, ECOG classification and stage), as well as treatment variables (previous adjuvant chemotherapy, intentionality, number of cycles, duration and pharmacogenetic aspects) and toxicity. Objective response rate and progression-free survival were calculated.

Results: The study included 71 patients, 35 treated with FOLFOX-6 and 36 with TTD. Both groups showed similar overall toxicity profiles. FOLFOX-6 had a higher incidence of neutropenia (46% vs. 8%; p < 0.01) and mucositis (51% vs. 22%; p < 0.013). In addition, there were more treatment delays (40% vs. 11%; p < 0.05) and 5-fluorouracil dose reductions (22% vs. 14%; p < 0.05) in the FOLFOX-6 group. Deaths due to toxicity were only recorded in the FOLFOX-6 group. Effectiveness was similar in both groups.

Conclusions: The TTD regimen could be a beneficial first-line option for metastatic colorectal cancer, with lower toxicity and effectiveness comparable to FOLFOX-6. It is a safe alternative for elderly or frail patients, suitable for reduced-dose 5-fluorouracil regimen with oxaliplatin.

在转移性结直肠癌中使用或不使用 5-氟尿嘧啶栓剂的 FOLFOX-6 方案的毒性。
目的:转移性结直肠癌的标准治疗方法包括持续输注奥沙利铂和 5-氟尿嘧啶。虽然 FOLFOX-6 是参考组合,但它具有侵袭性和高毒性。目前使用的变异方案包括 TTD 方案,该方案不包括亚叶酸或 5-氟尿嘧啶栓剂。本研究评估了 FOLFOX-6 和 TTD 在转移性结直肠癌一线治疗中的毒性及其有效性:方法:对开始接受 FOLFOX-6 和 TTD 治疗的患者进行为期三年的回顾性观察研究。研究收集了人口统计学和临床数据(年龄、性别、慢性病变、分子特征、侧位、ECOG分类和分期),以及治疗变量(既往辅助化疗、意向性、周期数、持续时间和药物遗传学方面)和毒性。计算了客观反应率和无进展生存期:研究共纳入71名患者,其中35人接受FOLFOX-6治疗,36人接受TTD治疗。两组患者的总体毒性情况相似。FOLFOX-6 中性粒细胞减少症的发生率更高(46% 对 8%;P 结论:TTD 方案可用于治疗中性粒细胞减少症:TTD方案可作为转移性结直肠癌的一线治疗方案,毒性较低,疗效与FOLFOX-6相当。对于老年或体弱患者来说,这是一种安全的替代方案,适合使用奥沙利铂的减量 5-氟尿嘧啶方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA
FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
21.40%
发文量
46
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Una gran revista para acceder a los mejores artículos originales y revisiones de la farmacoterapia actual. Además, es Órgano de expresión científica de la Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria, y está indexada en Index Medicus/Medline, EMBASE/Excerpta Médica, Alert, Internacional Pharmaceutical Abstracts y SCOPUS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信