Psychometric Validation of the Digital Competence Questionnaire for Nurses.

IF 2 Q2 NURSING
SAGE Open Nursing Pub Date : 2024-10-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23779608241272641
Christoph Golz, Sabine Hahn, Sandra M G Zwakhalen
{"title":"Psychometric Validation of the Digital Competence Questionnaire for Nurses.","authors":"Christoph Golz, Sabine Hahn, Sandra M G Zwakhalen","doi":"10.1177/23779608241272641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>No brief questionnaire comprising knowledge, skills, and attitudes is available to measure digital competence among clinical practice nurses.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim was to evaluate the structural validity and internal consistency of the Digital Competence Questionnaire (DCQ) for Clinical Practice Nurses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted with English-speaking clinical practice nurses. Twenty-six items from an initial item pool, developed in a prior conducted Delphi Study, were included. Exploratory factor analysis for structural validity with \"oblimin\" rotation and a two-factor solution as well as internal consistency test using Cronbach's alpha were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 185 nurses was obtained. The final questionnaire comprised of 12 items allocated to two factors: knowledge & skills and attitude. Factor \"attitude\" explained 33% of the variance and factor \"knowledge & skills\" 24%, resulting in a cumulative explanation of the variance of 57% by both factors. Internal consistency per factor was satisfactory, with 0.81 and 0.91, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The DCQ for clinical practice nurses is valid and has satisfactory internal consistency. Researchers and nurse managers can use it to assess the level of digital competence among clinical practice nurses. Future psychometric validation of the DCQ for clinical practice nurses is required to allow a conclusion on the goodness of fit and reliability.</p>","PeriodicalId":43312,"journal":{"name":"SAGE Open Nursing","volume":"10 ","pages":"23779608241272641"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11526274/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAGE Open Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608241272641","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: No brief questionnaire comprising knowledge, skills, and attitudes is available to measure digital competence among clinical practice nurses.

Objective: The aim was to evaluate the structural validity and internal consistency of the Digital Competence Questionnaire (DCQ) for Clinical Practice Nurses.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with English-speaking clinical practice nurses. Twenty-six items from an initial item pool, developed in a prior conducted Delphi Study, were included. Exploratory factor analysis for structural validity with "oblimin" rotation and a two-factor solution as well as internal consistency test using Cronbach's alpha were conducted.

Results: Data from 185 nurses was obtained. The final questionnaire comprised of 12 items allocated to two factors: knowledge & skills and attitude. Factor "attitude" explained 33% of the variance and factor "knowledge & skills" 24%, resulting in a cumulative explanation of the variance of 57% by both factors. Internal consistency per factor was satisfactory, with 0.81 and 0.91, respectively.

Conclusion: The DCQ for clinical practice nurses is valid and has satisfactory internal consistency. Researchers and nurse managers can use it to assess the level of digital competence among clinical practice nurses. Future psychometric validation of the DCQ for clinical practice nurses is required to allow a conclusion on the goodness of fit and reliability.

护士数字能力问卷的心理计量验证。
简介目前还没有包含知识、技能和态度的简短问卷来衡量临床实践护士的数字化能力:目的:评估临床实践护士数字能力问卷(DCQ)的结构有效性和内部一致性:对讲英语的临床实习护士进行了一项横断面研究。在之前进行的德尔菲研究(Delphi Study)中开发的初始项目库中包含了 26 个项目。采用 "oblimin "旋转和双因子解法对结构有效性进行了探索性因子分析,并使用 Cronbach's alpha 进行了内部一致性测试:获得了 185 名护士的数据。最终问卷由 12 个项目组成,分别归入两个因子:知识与技能和态度。态度 "因子解释了 33% 的方差,"知识与技能 "因子解释了 24%,因此两个因子对方差的累计解释为 57%。各因子的内部一致性令人满意,分别为 0.81 和 0.91:临床实践护士 DCQ 是有效的,其内部一致性令人满意。研究人员和护士管理者可以用它来评估临床实践护士的数字化能力水平。未来需要对临床实践护士的 DCQ 进行心理计量学验证,以便就拟合度和可靠性得出结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
106
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信