The unmet need for certification of vision impairment for people accessing a national primary care-based low vision rehabilitation service.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Rebecca John, Gwyn Williams, Tim Morgan, Michael R George, Rhianon Reynolds, Jennifer H Acton
{"title":"The unmet need for certification of vision impairment for people accessing a national primary care-based low vision rehabilitation service.","authors":"Rebecca John, Gwyn Williams, Tim Morgan, Michael R George, Rhianon Reynolds, Jennifer H Acton","doi":"10.1111/opo.13413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The certificate of vision impairment has an important role in enabling access to support for people with vision impairment (VI) and the provision of epidemiological data regarding sight loss. However, the rates of certification may not accurately reflect the number of people living with certifiable VI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Observational data from a national primary care low vision rehabilitation service between 1 April 2021 and 31 March 2022 were analysed. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the certification status of patients with certifiable VI. For patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and best-corrected visual acuity of 6/60 or worse, logistic regression was undertaken to assess the effects of patient characteristics on certification status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For patients with AMD and certifiable levels of visual acuity, 41.00% (n = 426) were not certified. The reported certification was 60.09% (n = 256) and 58.24% (n = 357) for neovascular AMD and atrophic AMD, respectively. Existing patients of the service were 3.87 times more likely to be certified than new patients (OR 3.87, 95% CI 2.7-5.4). Increasing age (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.004-1.038) and decreasing visual acuity (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.50-0.78) were associated with an increased likelihood of certification.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A significant number of patients live with certifiable vision impairment but do not access certification. Policy changes in Wales now enable patients with bilateral atrophic AMD to access certification within the primary care setting. Given the unmet need, consideration should be given to primary care certification in the rest of the UK, and in Wales, the potential to expand the scope of conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19522,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.13413","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The certificate of vision impairment has an important role in enabling access to support for people with vision impairment (VI) and the provision of epidemiological data regarding sight loss. However, the rates of certification may not accurately reflect the number of people living with certifiable VI.

Methods: Observational data from a national primary care low vision rehabilitation service between 1 April 2021 and 31 March 2022 were analysed. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the certification status of patients with certifiable VI. For patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and best-corrected visual acuity of 6/60 or worse, logistic regression was undertaken to assess the effects of patient characteristics on certification status.

Results: For patients with AMD and certifiable levels of visual acuity, 41.00% (n = 426) were not certified. The reported certification was 60.09% (n = 256) and 58.24% (n = 357) for neovascular AMD and atrophic AMD, respectively. Existing patients of the service were 3.87 times more likely to be certified than new patients (OR 3.87, 95% CI 2.7-5.4). Increasing age (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.004-1.038) and decreasing visual acuity (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.50-0.78) were associated with an increased likelihood of certification.

Conclusion: A significant number of patients live with certifiable vision impairment but do not access certification. Policy changes in Wales now enable patients with bilateral atrophic AMD to access certification within the primary care setting. Given the unmet need, consideration should be given to primary care certification in the rest of the UK, and in Wales, the potential to expand the scope of conditions.

全国基层医疗机构低视力康复服务中未满足的视力障碍证明需求。
背景:视力障碍证明在帮助视力障碍(VI)患者获得支持和提供有关视力丧失的流行病学数据方面发挥着重要作用。然而,证明书的发放率可能并不能准确反映可证明患有视力障碍的人数:方法:分析了 2021 年 4 月 1 日至 2022 年 3 月 31 日期间来自全国基层医疗低视力康复服务机构的观察数据。描述性统计用于描述可认证视障患者的认证状况。对于患有老年性黄斑变性(AMD)且最佳矫正视力为 6/60 或更差的患者,采用逻辑回归法评估患者特征对认证状态的影响:在视力达到可认证水平的老年性黄斑变性患者中,41.00%(n = 426)未获得认证。新生血管性 AMD 和萎缩性 AMD 的认证率分别为 60.09%(n = 256)和 58.24%(n = 357)。现有患者获得认证的可能性是新患者的 3.87 倍(OR 3.87,95% CI 2.7-5.4)。年龄增加(OR 1.02,95% CI 1.004-1.038)和视力下降(OR 0.62,95% CI 0.50-0.78)与获得认证的可能性增加有关:结论:大量患者患有可认证的视力损伤,但却无法获得认证。威尔士的政策变化使双侧萎缩性黄斑变性患者能够在初级医疗机构获得认证。鉴于这一需求尚未得到满足,应考虑在英国其他地区开展初级医疗认证,并考虑在威尔士扩大条件范围的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
13.80%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics, first published in 1925, is a leading international interdisciplinary journal that addresses basic and applied questions pertinent to contemporary research in vision science and optometry. OPO publishes original research papers, technical notes, reviews and letters and will interest researchers, educators and clinicians concerned with the development, use and restoration of vision.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信