An association of cognitive function with mobile metrics of community walking in older cancer survivors: A pilot study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Brendan L McNeish, Andrea L Rosso, Grace Campbell, Jennifer Fedor, Krina C Durica, Christianna Bartel, Gregory Marchetti, Carissa A Low
{"title":"An association of cognitive function with mobile metrics of community walking in older cancer survivors: A pilot study.","authors":"Brendan L McNeish, Andrea L Rosso, Grace Campbell, Jennifer Fedor, Krina C Durica, Christianna Bartel, Gregory Marchetti, Carissa A Low","doi":"10.1016/j.jgo.2024.102146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Older cancer survivors have an elevated risk for mobility dysfunction compared to their cancer-free peers. Despite the established link between cognitive function and community walking in older cancer-free adults, little is known about this relationship in older cancer survivors. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the association of performance-based and self-reported cognitive function with mobile metrics of community walking collected by a wearable Fitbit device.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study enrolled older cancer survivors (mean age 73 years old, range 65-83; 98 % White; 50 % female) within five years of completing primary treatment. Cognitive function, specifically executive function and processing speed was collected with the digit symbol substitution test (DSST) and self-reported cognition was evaluated by the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System- Cognitive (PROMIS-Cog). Continuous walking data from Fitbit wearable devices were collected passively over four weeks. To examine associations between DSST and PROMIS-Cog with mobile measures of walking, we conducted bivariate correlation and multivariable linear regression analyses adjusting for age, education, and number of comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In bivariate analyses, higher DSST scores were correlated with higher step count and peak cadence and lower fragmentation of walking in daily life (r = 0.48-0.51, p < 0.01). Higher PROMIS-Cog scores were correlated with higher peak cadence (r = 0.32, p < 0.05), trended towards correlation with step count (r = 0.30, p = 0.06), and were not correlated with fragmentation of walking (r = -0.24, p = 0.13). In multivariable models adjusting for age, presence of graduate level education, and number of comorbidities, higher DSST scores were independently associated with higher peak cadence, step count, and demonstrated a trend towards lower fragmentation of walking in daily life, but PROMIS-Cog was not independently associated with any mobility metrics. Similar results for association of DSST with walking when models included adjustment for PROMIS-depression scale, receipt of chemotherapy treatment, or when education was defined by presence of a bachelor's degree.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study suggests an association between cognitive functions of executive function and processing speed with mobile metrics of community walking in older cancer survivors. Understanding how cognitive function affects walking may help identify new rehabilitation targets for older cancer survivors.</p>","PeriodicalId":15943,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric oncology","volume":" ","pages":"102146"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of geriatric oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2024.102146","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Older cancer survivors have an elevated risk for mobility dysfunction compared to their cancer-free peers. Despite the established link between cognitive function and community walking in older cancer-free adults, little is known about this relationship in older cancer survivors. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the association of performance-based and self-reported cognitive function with mobile metrics of community walking collected by a wearable Fitbit device.

Materials and methods: This study enrolled older cancer survivors (mean age 73 years old, range 65-83; 98 % White; 50 % female) within five years of completing primary treatment. Cognitive function, specifically executive function and processing speed was collected with the digit symbol substitution test (DSST) and self-reported cognition was evaluated by the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System- Cognitive (PROMIS-Cog). Continuous walking data from Fitbit wearable devices were collected passively over four weeks. To examine associations between DSST and PROMIS-Cog with mobile measures of walking, we conducted bivariate correlation and multivariable linear regression analyses adjusting for age, education, and number of comorbidities.

Results: In bivariate analyses, higher DSST scores were correlated with higher step count and peak cadence and lower fragmentation of walking in daily life (r = 0.48-0.51, p < 0.01). Higher PROMIS-Cog scores were correlated with higher peak cadence (r = 0.32, p < 0.05), trended towards correlation with step count (r = 0.30, p = 0.06), and were not correlated with fragmentation of walking (r = -0.24, p = 0.13). In multivariable models adjusting for age, presence of graduate level education, and number of comorbidities, higher DSST scores were independently associated with higher peak cadence, step count, and demonstrated a trend towards lower fragmentation of walking in daily life, but PROMIS-Cog was not independently associated with any mobility metrics. Similar results for association of DSST with walking when models included adjustment for PROMIS-depression scale, receipt of chemotherapy treatment, or when education was defined by presence of a bachelor's degree.

Discussion: This study suggests an association between cognitive functions of executive function and processing speed with mobile metrics of community walking in older cancer survivors. Understanding how cognitive function affects walking may help identify new rehabilitation targets for older cancer survivors.

老年癌症幸存者的认知功能与社区步行的移动指标之间的联系:试点研究
前言与未患癌症的同龄人相比,老年癌症幸存者出现行动功能障碍的风险更高。尽管在未患癌症的老年人中,认知功能与社区步行之间已建立了联系,但对老年癌症幸存者的这种关系却知之甚少。这项试点研究旨在评估基于表现和自我报告的认知功能与可穿戴 Fitbit 设备收集的社区步行移动指标之间的关系:本研究招募了完成初级治疗五年内的老年癌症幸存者(平均年龄 73 岁,65-83 岁不等;98% 为白人;50% 为女性)。通过数字符号替换测试(DSST)收集认知功能,特别是执行功能和处理速度,并通过患者报告结果测量信息系统-认知(PROMIS-Cog)评估自我报告的认知情况。Fitbit 可穿戴设备在四周内被动收集了连续行走数据。为了研究 DSST 和 PROMIS-Cog 与移动步行测量之间的关联,我们进行了双变量相关分析和多变量线性回归分析,并对年龄、教育程度和合并症数量进行了调整:在双变量分析中,较高的DSST得分与较高的步数和峰值步频以及较低的日常生活中的步行片段相关(r = 0.48-0.51, p 讨论:本研究表明,老年癌症幸存者的执行功能和处理速度等认知功能与社区步行的移动指标之间存在关联。了解认知功能如何影响步行有助于为老年癌症幸存者确定新的康复目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of geriatric oncology
Journal of geriatric oncology ONCOLOGY-GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
379
审稿时长
80 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geriatric Oncology is an international, multidisciplinary journal which is focused on advancing research in the treatment and survivorship issues of older adults with cancer, as well as literature relevant to education and policy development in geriatric oncology. The journal welcomes the submission of manuscripts in the following categories: • Original research articles • Review articles • Clinical trials • Education and training articles • Short communications • Perspectives • Meeting reports • Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信