Willingness of Women at Increased Risk of Breast Cancer to Participate in Prevention Trials.

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Cecilia N Mastrogiacomo, Alexa Courtepatte, Anne Moyer, Christina Preece, Patricia Thompson, Alison Stopeck
{"title":"Willingness of Women at Increased Risk of Breast Cancer to Participate in Prevention Trials.","authors":"Cecilia N Mastrogiacomo, Alexa Courtepatte, Anne Moyer, Christina Preece, Patricia Thompson, Alison Stopeck","doi":"10.1200/OP-24-00487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The factors affecting women's willingness to participate (WTP) in breast cancer (BC) prevention trials are poorly understood. This study aimed to identify the characteristics of interventions associated with a higher WTP among high BC risk women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Women who self-identified as being at an increased risk of BC were recruited to a cross-sectional study of WTP in BC prevention trials. Responses were dichotomized into more willing (a lot and moderately) and less willing (some, a little, and not at all), and responses were compared by patient characteristics and intervention type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 143 participants, 81.2% (116) completed ≥30% of a Likert-type scale questionnaire on WTP in various intervention types for BC prevention. Overall, WTP in BC prevention studies was high, with 82.7% more willing, including 69.0% and 70.7%, respectively, for unspecified physical activity and dietary interventions. WTP differed significantly by the duration of diet-based and physical activity behavior change interventions: decreasing with 12- versus 3-month diet-based interventions (<i>P</i> < .0001) and decreasing for 1 hour versus 30 minutes of low-intensity exercise/day (<i>P</i> < .0001). For interventions involving medication, only 18.1% expressed being more willing to participate, and WTP decreased significantly when side effects were presented. WTP was influenced by BC risk gene mutation status, with WTP among gene carriers higher compared with nongene carriers (52.6% <i>v</i> 30.2%, <i>P</i> = .018).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>WTP in BC prevention trials was the highest for women with known genetic risk and for interventions involving a behavior change. Medications with side effects had the lowest WTP. For behavior change, WTP was negatively influenced by intervention duration beyond a few months, indicating that individual perception of BC risk and inconvenience strongly influence WTP.</p>","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":" ","pages":"OP2400487"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP-24-00487","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The factors affecting women's willingness to participate (WTP) in breast cancer (BC) prevention trials are poorly understood. This study aimed to identify the characteristics of interventions associated with a higher WTP among high BC risk women.

Methods: Women who self-identified as being at an increased risk of BC were recruited to a cross-sectional study of WTP in BC prevention trials. Responses were dichotomized into more willing (a lot and moderately) and less willing (some, a little, and not at all), and responses were compared by patient characteristics and intervention type.

Results: Of 143 participants, 81.2% (116) completed ≥30% of a Likert-type scale questionnaire on WTP in various intervention types for BC prevention. Overall, WTP in BC prevention studies was high, with 82.7% more willing, including 69.0% and 70.7%, respectively, for unspecified physical activity and dietary interventions. WTP differed significantly by the duration of diet-based and physical activity behavior change interventions: decreasing with 12- versus 3-month diet-based interventions (P < .0001) and decreasing for 1 hour versus 30 minutes of low-intensity exercise/day (P < .0001). For interventions involving medication, only 18.1% expressed being more willing to participate, and WTP decreased significantly when side effects were presented. WTP was influenced by BC risk gene mutation status, with WTP among gene carriers higher compared with nongene carriers (52.6% v 30.2%, P = .018).

Conclusion: WTP in BC prevention trials was the highest for women with known genetic risk and for interventions involving a behavior change. Medications with side effects had the lowest WTP. For behavior change, WTP was negatively influenced by intervention duration beyond a few months, indicating that individual perception of BC risk and inconvenience strongly influence WTP.

乳腺癌风险增加的妇女参与预防试验的意愿。
目的:人们对影响妇女参与乳腺癌(BC)预防试验意愿(WTP)的因素知之甚少。本研究旨在确定与乳腺癌高危女性WTP较高相关的干预措施的特征:方法:招募自认为乳腺癌风险较高的妇女参加一项关于乳腺癌预防试验WTP的横断面研究。结果:在 143 名参与者中,81.2% 的人表示愿意接受治疗,其中有 7.1%的人表示不愿意接受治疗:在143名参与者中,81.2%(116人)完成了≥30%的李克特(Likert)量表式调查问卷,内容涉及预防乳腺癌的各种干预类型的WTP。总体而言,BC 预防研究中的 WTP 很高,82.7% 的人更愿意接受,其中 69.0% 和 70.7% 的人分别愿意接受未指定的体育锻炼和饮食干预。饮食干预和体育锻炼行为改变干预的持续时间不同,WTP 也有很大差异:12 个月与 3 个月的饮食干预相比,WTP 下降(P < .0001);每天 1 小时与 30 分钟的低强度锻炼相比,WTP 下降(P < .0001)。对于涉及药物治疗的干预措施,只有 18.1% 的人表示更愿意参与,而且当出现副作用时,WTP 显著下降。WTP受BC风险基因突变状态的影响,基因携带者的WTP高于非基因携带者(52.6% v 30.2%,P = .018):结论:在 BC 预防试验中,已知遗传风险的妇女和涉及行为改变的干预措施的 WTP 最高。有副作用的药物的 WTP 最低。就行为改变而言,干预持续时间超过几个月,WTP 就会受到负面影响,这表明个人对 BC 风险和不便的感知对 WTP 有很大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
518
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信