{"title":"Molecular detection of Staphylococcus aureus in urine in patients with S. aureus bacteremia: an exploratory study.","authors":"Franziska Schuler, Achim J Kaasch, Frieder Schaumburg","doi":"10.1007/s10096-024-04969-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) is associated with a 90-day mortality of 28-34%. Many SAB-patients (7.8-39%) have a secondary S. aureus bacteriuria (SABU) mainly without symptoms of a urinary tract infection. Due to high morbidity and mortality, there is an interest in rapid detection of S. aureus bacteremia. Here, we compared a rapid nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) with conventional culture to detect S. aureus in urine and to identify cases with increased risk for SAB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a cross-sectional study, we assessed urine samples (mid-stream, clean catch and catheter urine) of patients with SAB and bacteremia other than SAB (non-SAB). Urine samples were collected ± 3 days to the collection of the positive blood culture and were cultured on a set of selective and non-selective agar plates. NAAT was performed using a commercial test (Xpert<sup>®</sup> SA Nasal Complete G3, Cepheid) from a sterile swab soaked in urine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included samples from 100 patients (68% male, median age: 67.4 years) with SAB and 20 patients (75% male, median age: 65.84 years) with non-SAB. The sensitivity of detecting SAB from urine samples was 47% (specificity: 90%) for NAAT, when applying a Ct-value of ≤ 37.4 for positive results. Urine culture had a sensitivity of 25% and a specificity of 95%. Molecular and culture methods showed a moderate agreement (80%, Cohens kappa: 0.55).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NAAT from urine has a higher sensitivity than culture in patients with SAB and could potentially identify cases with increased risk for SAB. Future studies should investigate whether this characteristic could translate into a clinical benefit through rapid detection of SAB.</p>","PeriodicalId":11782,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-024-04969-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) is associated with a 90-day mortality of 28-34%. Many SAB-patients (7.8-39%) have a secondary S. aureus bacteriuria (SABU) mainly without symptoms of a urinary tract infection. Due to high morbidity and mortality, there is an interest in rapid detection of S. aureus bacteremia. Here, we compared a rapid nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) with conventional culture to detect S. aureus in urine and to identify cases with increased risk for SAB.
Methods: In a cross-sectional study, we assessed urine samples (mid-stream, clean catch and catheter urine) of patients with SAB and bacteremia other than SAB (non-SAB). Urine samples were collected ± 3 days to the collection of the positive blood culture and were cultured on a set of selective and non-selective agar plates. NAAT was performed using a commercial test (Xpert® SA Nasal Complete G3, Cepheid) from a sterile swab soaked in urine.
Results: We included samples from 100 patients (68% male, median age: 67.4 years) with SAB and 20 patients (75% male, median age: 65.84 years) with non-SAB. The sensitivity of detecting SAB from urine samples was 47% (specificity: 90%) for NAAT, when applying a Ct-value of ≤ 37.4 for positive results. Urine culture had a sensitivity of 25% and a specificity of 95%. Molecular and culture methods showed a moderate agreement (80%, Cohens kappa: 0.55).
Conclusion: NAAT from urine has a higher sensitivity than culture in patients with SAB and could potentially identify cases with increased risk for SAB. Future studies should investigate whether this characteristic could translate into a clinical benefit through rapid detection of SAB.
目的:金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症(SAB)的 90 天死亡率为 28-34%。许多 SAB 患者(7.8%-39%)有继发性金黄色葡萄球菌菌尿(SABU),主要没有尿路感染症状。由于发病率和死亡率较高,人们对快速检测金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症很感兴趣。在此,我们比较了快速核酸扩增检验(NAAT)与传统培养法,以检测尿液中的金黄色葡萄球菌,并确定 SAB 风险增加的病例:在一项横断面研究中,我们对 SAB 患者和 SAB 以外的菌血症(非 SAB)患者的尿液样本(中段尿、清洁接尿和导管尿)进行了评估。尿液样本在血液培养阳性后 3 天内采集,并在一组选择性和非选择性琼脂平板上进行培养。使用商用检测试剂(Xpert® SA Nasal Complete G3,Cepheid)对浸泡在尿液中的无菌拭子进行 NAAT 检测:我们采集了 100 名 SAB 患者(68% 为男性,中位年龄为 67.4 岁)和 20 名非 SAB 患者(75% 为男性,中位年龄为 65.84 岁)的样本。当阳性结果的 Ct 值小于 37.4 时,NAAT 从尿液样本中检测 SAB 的灵敏度为 47%(特异性:90%)。尿培养的灵敏度为 25%,特异性为 95%。分子法和培养法显示出中等程度的一致性(80%,Cohens kappa:0.55):结论:在 SAB 患者中,尿液 NAAT 的灵敏度高于培养,有可能识别出 SAB 风险增加的病例。未来的研究应探讨这一特性是否能通过快速检测 SAB 转化为临床益处。
期刊介绍:
EJCMID is an interdisciplinary journal devoted to the publication of communications on infectious diseases of bacterial, viral and parasitic origin.