A prospective randomized-controlled non-blinded comparative study of the JAK inhibitor (baricitinib) with TNF-α inhibitors and conventional DMARDs in a sample of Egyptian rheumatoid arthritis patients.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Esraa M Mahmoud, Abdullah Radwan, Sahar A Elsayed
{"title":"A prospective randomized-controlled non-blinded comparative study of the JAK inhibitor (baricitinib) with TNF-α inhibitors and conventional DMARDs in a sample of Egyptian rheumatoid arthritis patients.","authors":"Esraa M Mahmoud, Abdullah Radwan, Sahar A Elsayed","doi":"10.1007/s10067-024-07194-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To evaluate the efficacy of baricitinib compared to TNF-α Inhibitors and conventional DMARDs (cDMARDs) in patients with RA. Our study included 334 RA patients classified into 3 groups: the first receiving baricitinib, the second receiving TNF-α Inhibitors, and the third receiving cDMARDs. Patients were evaluated at baseline, week 12, and week 24 using TJC, SJC, VAS, DAS28, CDAI, and HAQ-DI. Larsen score was measured at baseline and 24 weeks. The response to therapy was assessed at weeks 12 and 24 using ACR 20, ACR 50, and ACR 70 response criteria. Emerging treatment side effects were monitored. Patients receiving baricitinib showed significant improvement regarding all outcome measures at weeks 12 and 24. In addition, baricitinib was comparable to TNF Inhibitors in all outcome measures except the ACR 70 at week 12, which was higher in the baricitinib group. Furthermore, baricitinib group showed significantly better outcome measures and response to therapy in comparison to cDMARDs group. The most common side effects in the baricitinib group were infection, GIT, and CVS complications. The most common side effects in the TNF inhibitors group were infection and skin complications. The cDMARDs had the least side effects, mostly GIT complications. Baricitinib is an effective drug for treating RA refractory to cDMARDs, improving disease activity measures and functional status and reducing the progression of structural joint damage. It has a comparable efficacy and safety profile to TNF Inhibitors. Multicenter studies are recommended to support our results. Key Points • Baricitinib is an effective therapeutic choice for rheumatoid arthritis refractory to cDMARDs. • Patients treated with baricitinib showed improvement in all outcome measures and functional status. • Bricitinib delayed the progression of radiographic joint damage more effectively than cDMARDs. • The efficacy and safety of baricitinib for treating rheumatoid arthritis is comparable to that of TNF inhibitors.</p>","PeriodicalId":10482,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rheumatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-024-07194-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To evaluate the efficacy of baricitinib compared to TNF-α Inhibitors and conventional DMARDs (cDMARDs) in patients with RA. Our study included 334 RA patients classified into 3 groups: the first receiving baricitinib, the second receiving TNF-α Inhibitors, and the third receiving cDMARDs. Patients were evaluated at baseline, week 12, and week 24 using TJC, SJC, VAS, DAS28, CDAI, and HAQ-DI. Larsen score was measured at baseline and 24 weeks. The response to therapy was assessed at weeks 12 and 24 using ACR 20, ACR 50, and ACR 70 response criteria. Emerging treatment side effects were monitored. Patients receiving baricitinib showed significant improvement regarding all outcome measures at weeks 12 and 24. In addition, baricitinib was comparable to TNF Inhibitors in all outcome measures except the ACR 70 at week 12, which was higher in the baricitinib group. Furthermore, baricitinib group showed significantly better outcome measures and response to therapy in comparison to cDMARDs group. The most common side effects in the baricitinib group were infection, GIT, and CVS complications. The most common side effects in the TNF inhibitors group were infection and skin complications. The cDMARDs had the least side effects, mostly GIT complications. Baricitinib is an effective drug for treating RA refractory to cDMARDs, improving disease activity measures and functional status and reducing the progression of structural joint damage. It has a comparable efficacy and safety profile to TNF Inhibitors. Multicenter studies are recommended to support our results. Key Points • Baricitinib is an effective therapeutic choice for rheumatoid arthritis refractory to cDMARDs. • Patients treated with baricitinib showed improvement in all outcome measures and functional status. • Bricitinib delayed the progression of radiographic joint damage more effectively than cDMARDs. • The efficacy and safety of baricitinib for treating rheumatoid arthritis is comparable to that of TNF inhibitors.

在埃及类风湿性关节炎患者样本中进行的一项前瞻性随机对照非盲对比研究,研究对象为 JAK 抑制剂(巴利昔尼)、TNF-α 抑制剂和传统 DMARDs。
评估巴利昔尼与TNF-α抑制剂和传统DMARDs(cDMARDs)相比对RA患者的疗效。我们的研究包括 334 例 RA 患者,分为 3 组:第一组接受巴利昔尼治疗,第二组接受 TNF-α 抑制剂治疗,第三组接受 cDMARDs 治疗。在基线、第 12 周和第 24 周使用 TJC、SJC、VAS、DAS28、CDAI 和 HAQ-DI 对患者进行评估。拉森评分在基线和 24 周时进行测量。在第 12 周和第 24 周,使用 ACR 20、ACR 50 和 ACR 70 反应标准评估治疗反应。对新出现的治疗副作用进行了监测。接受巴利昔尼治疗的患者在第12周和第24周时的所有疗效指标均有显著改善。此外,除了第12周的ACR 70在巴利昔替尼组更高之外,巴利昔替尼在所有结果指标上都与TNF抑制剂相当。此外,与cDMARDs组相比,巴利昔替尼组的疗效和治疗反应明显更好。巴利替尼组最常见的副作用是感染、消化道和CVS并发症。TNF抑制剂组最常见的副作用是感染和皮肤并发症。cDMARDs 的副作用最小,主要是消化道并发症。巴利昔尼是一种治疗cDMARDs难治性RA的有效药物,可改善疾病活动度和功能状态,减少关节结构性损伤的进展。它的疗效和安全性与 TNF 抑制剂相当。建议进行多中心研究以支持我们的结果。要点 - 对于cDMARDs难治的类风湿关节炎,巴利昔尼是一种有效的治疗选择。- 接受巴利昔尼治疗的患者在所有结果指标和功能状态方面都有所改善。- 与cDMARDs相比,巴利昔尼能更有效地延缓关节放射损伤的进展。- 巴利昔尼治疗类风湿关节炎的疗效和安全性与TNF抑制剂相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Rheumatology
Clinical Rheumatology 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
2.90%
发文量
441
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Rheumatology is an international English-language journal devoted to publishing original clinical investigation and research in the general field of rheumatology with accent on clinical aspects at postgraduate level. The journal succeeds Acta Rheumatologica Belgica, originally founded in 1945 as the official journal of the Belgian Rheumatology Society. Clinical Rheumatology aims to cover all modern trends in clinical and experimental research as well as the management and evaluation of diagnostic and treatment procedures connected with the inflammatory, immunologic, metabolic, genetic and degenerative soft and hard connective tissue diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信