Analysis of changes in bone mineral density and cortical bone thickness after reconstruction of the mandible with fibula, is condyle preservation a critical influence factor?

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Yihui Yang, Shang Xie, Yifan Kang, Xiangyu Li, Huimin Chen, Xiaofeng Shan, Zhigang Cai
{"title":"Analysis of changes in bone mineral density and cortical bone thickness after reconstruction of the mandible with fibula, is condyle preservation a critical influence factor?","authors":"Yihui Yang, Shang Xie, Yifan Kang, Xiangyu Li, Huimin Chen, Xiaofeng Shan, Zhigang Cai","doi":"10.1007/s00784-024-06027-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the features of bone mineral density (BMD) and cortical bone thickness in grafted fibula.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Eighty-six patients who underwent mandibular reconstruction using vascularized fibula flaps were enrolled, all of whom were followed up at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. The patients were grouped according to whether the condyle was preserved. BMD and cortical bone thickness were also measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Condyle-preserved group consisted of 65 patients and condyle-unpreserved group consisted of 21 patients. There was a significant correlation between thickness and BMD, which was significantly correlated with follow-up time. One year after surgery, the BMD of the condyle-preserved group decreased from 1029.61 ± 156.01 mg/cm<sup>3</sup> to 978.6 ± 141.90 mg/cm<sup>3</sup>, and thickness decreased from 3.29 ± 0.65 mm to 2.72 ± 0.72 mm. BMD of the condyle-unpreserved group decreased from 1062.21 ± 126.01 mg/cm<sup>3</sup> to 851.26 ± 144.38 mg/cm<sup>3</sup>, and thickness decreased from 3.46 ± 0.89 mm to 2.56 ± 0.73 mm. In the condyle-preserved and unpreserved groups, the absorption rates of BMD were 3.29 ± 11.97% and 17.09 ± 12.42% at 12 months, respectively, and the rate of thickness was 20.7 ± 11.45% and 26.39 ± 12.23% at 12 months, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BMD and thickness showed a decreasing trend over time. Preserving the condyle can slow bone resorption of the fibula. Regarding implant restoration, we recommend doctors to perform the treatment within 6-12 months after surgery in order to effectively manage bone resorption.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Our study found that condylar preservation can decrease the absorption rate of BMD and cortical bone thickness, helping doctors make better clinical decisions.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>ChiCTR2300069661 (March 22, 2023).</p>","PeriodicalId":10461,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Investigations","volume":"28 11","pages":"622"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-06027-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the features of bone mineral density (BMD) and cortical bone thickness in grafted fibula.

Materials and methods: Eighty-six patients who underwent mandibular reconstruction using vascularized fibula flaps were enrolled, all of whom were followed up at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. The patients were grouped according to whether the condyle was preserved. BMD and cortical bone thickness were also measured.

Results: Condyle-preserved group consisted of 65 patients and condyle-unpreserved group consisted of 21 patients. There was a significant correlation between thickness and BMD, which was significantly correlated with follow-up time. One year after surgery, the BMD of the condyle-preserved group decreased from 1029.61 ± 156.01 mg/cm3 to 978.6 ± 141.90 mg/cm3, and thickness decreased from 3.29 ± 0.65 mm to 2.72 ± 0.72 mm. BMD of the condyle-unpreserved group decreased from 1062.21 ± 126.01 mg/cm3 to 851.26 ± 144.38 mg/cm3, and thickness decreased from 3.46 ± 0.89 mm to 2.56 ± 0.73 mm. In the condyle-preserved and unpreserved groups, the absorption rates of BMD were 3.29 ± 11.97% and 17.09 ± 12.42% at 12 months, respectively, and the rate of thickness was 20.7 ± 11.45% and 26.39 ± 12.23% at 12 months, respectively.

Conclusion: BMD and thickness showed a decreasing trend over time. Preserving the condyle can slow bone resorption of the fibula. Regarding implant restoration, we recommend doctors to perform the treatment within 6-12 months after surgery in order to effectively manage bone resorption.

Clinical relevance: Our study found that condylar preservation can decrease the absorption rate of BMD and cortical bone thickness, helping doctors make better clinical decisions.

Trial registration number: ChiCTR2300069661 (March 22, 2023).

分析腓骨重建下颌骨后骨矿物质密度和皮质骨厚度的变化,保留髁状突是关键影响因素吗?
研究目的本研究旨在探讨移植腓骨的骨矿密度(BMD)和皮质骨厚度的特征:研究对象包括86名使用血管化腓骨瓣进行下颌骨重建的患者,所有患者均在术后3、6和12个月接受了随访。根据是否保留髁状突对患者进行分组。同时还测量了 BMD 和皮质骨厚度:结果:保留髁突组有 65 名患者,未保留髁突组有 21 名患者。骨皮质厚度与 BMD 之间有明显的相关性,而 BMD 又与随访时间有明显的相关性。术后一年,髁保留组的 BMD 从 1029.61 ± 156.01 mg/cm3 降至 978.6 ± 141.90 mg/cm3,厚度从 3.29 ± 0.65 mm 降至 2.72 ± 0.72 mm。髁部未保存组的 BMD 从 1062.21 ± 126.01 mg/cm3 降至 851.26 ± 144.38 mg/cm3,厚度从 3.46 ± 0.89 mm 降至 2.56 ± 0.73 mm。在髁保留组和未保留组中,12 个月时 BMD 的吸收率分别为 3.29 ± 11.97% 和 17.09 ± 12.42%,12 个月时厚度的吸收率分别为 20.7 ± 11.45% 和 26.39 ± 12.23%:结论:随着时间的推移,BMD 和厚度呈下降趋势。保留髁部可以减缓腓骨的骨吸收。关于种植修复,我们建议医生在术后 6-12 个月内进行治疗,以有效控制骨吸收:临床相关性:我们的研究发现,保留髁状突可以降低 BMD 的吸收率和皮质骨厚度,帮助医生做出更好的临床决策:ChiCTR2300069661(2023年3月22日)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Oral Investigations
Clinical Oral Investigations 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
484
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal Clinical Oral Investigations is a multidisciplinary, international forum for publication of research from all fields of oral medicine. The journal publishes original scientific articles and invited reviews which provide up-to-date results of basic and clinical studies in oral and maxillofacial science and medicine. The aim is to clarify the relevance of new results to modern practice, for an international readership. Coverage includes maxillofacial and oral surgery, prosthetics and restorative dentistry, operative dentistry, endodontics, periodontology, orthodontics, dental materials science, clinical trials, epidemiology, pedodontics, oral implant, preventive dentistiry, oral pathology, oral basic sciences and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信