Association of relapses with visual outcomes in optic neuritis: a post hoc analysis of the optic neuritis treatment trial.

IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Ruitong Song, Meifeng Luo, Siqian Wei, Wenjing Luo, Kaijung Li, Yi Du
{"title":"Association of relapses with visual outcomes in optic neuritis: a post hoc analysis of the optic neuritis treatment trial.","authors":"Ruitong Song, Meifeng Luo, Siqian Wei, Wenjing Luo, Kaijung Li, Yi Du","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjo.2024.10.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine whether the number of relapses is associated with visual outcomes in patients with optic neuritis.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A post hoc analysis using data from the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial, a multicenter randomized controlled trial conducted to explore the efficacy of corticosteroids on optic neuritis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multivariate linear mixed effect models were used to estimate the associations of the number of ipsilateral relapses in the baseline affected eye with visual outcomes. The modeling accounted for the number of ipsilateral relapses and adjusted for time to follow-up visit, baseline visual function, treatment groups, the number of contralateral relapses, the interaction between the number of relapses and time to follow-up, as well as demographic covariates of age, sex, race/ethnicity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 449 included patients, 71 (15.8%) had one ipsilateral relapse, and 24 (5.3%) had ≥2 ipsilateral relapses. The mean age of the patients was 31.9 years, with 345 (76.8%) females and 384 (85.5%) Whites. The median follow-up time was 15.9 years. In the adjusted mixed model, higher number of ipsilateral relapses was associated with poorer visual outcomes, including visual acuity (mean difference [MD], 0.20 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution unit; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15 to 0.25 for ≥2 vs no ipsilateral relapse), contrast sensitivity (MD, -1.14 lines; 95% CI, -1.54 to -0.73 for ≥2 vs no ipsilateral relapse), visual field mean deviation (MD, -3.57 decibels; 95% CI, -4.38 to -2.76 for ≥2 vs no ipsilateral relapse), and color vision (MD, 1.94 error scores; 95% CI, 0.74 to 3.14 for ≥2 vs no ipsilateral relapse).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Increasing number of relapses was associated with worse visual outcomes. More aggressive management following an initial episode is imperative to prevent relapse.</p>","PeriodicalId":9606,"journal":{"name":"Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2024.10.005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine whether the number of relapses is associated with visual outcomes in patients with optic neuritis.

Design: A post hoc analysis using data from the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial, a multicenter randomized controlled trial conducted to explore the efficacy of corticosteroids on optic neuritis.

Methods: Multivariate linear mixed effect models were used to estimate the associations of the number of ipsilateral relapses in the baseline affected eye with visual outcomes. The modeling accounted for the number of ipsilateral relapses and adjusted for time to follow-up visit, baseline visual function, treatment groups, the number of contralateral relapses, the interaction between the number of relapses and time to follow-up, as well as demographic covariates of age, sex, race/ethnicity.

Results: Among the 449 included patients, 71 (15.8%) had one ipsilateral relapse, and 24 (5.3%) had ≥2 ipsilateral relapses. The mean age of the patients was 31.9 years, with 345 (76.8%) females and 384 (85.5%) Whites. The median follow-up time was 15.9 years. In the adjusted mixed model, higher number of ipsilateral relapses was associated with poorer visual outcomes, including visual acuity (mean difference [MD], 0.20 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution unit; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15 to 0.25 for ≥2 vs no ipsilateral relapse), contrast sensitivity (MD, -1.14 lines; 95% CI, -1.54 to -0.73 for ≥2 vs no ipsilateral relapse), visual field mean deviation (MD, -3.57 decibels; 95% CI, -4.38 to -2.76 for ≥2 vs no ipsilateral relapse), and color vision (MD, 1.94 error scores; 95% CI, 0.74 to 3.14 for ≥2 vs no ipsilateral relapse).

Conclusions: Increasing number of relapses was associated with worse visual outcomes. More aggressive management following an initial episode is imperative to prevent relapse.

视神经炎复发与视觉效果的关系:视神经炎治疗试验的事后分析。
目的:研究复发次数是否与视神经炎患者的视觉效果有关:研究复发次数是否与视神经炎患者的视觉效果有关:视神经炎治疗试验是一项多中心随机对照试验,旨在探讨皮质类固醇对视神经炎的疗效:方法:采用多变量线性混合效应模型估算基线患眼同侧复发次数与视觉结果的关系。该模型考虑了同侧复发次数,并对随访时间、基线视功能、治疗组、对侧复发次数、复发次数与随访时间之间的交互作用以及年龄、性别、种族/民族等人口统计学协变量进行了调整:在纳入的 449 例患者中,71 例(15.8%)同侧复发 1 次,24 例(5.3%)同侧复发≥2 次。患者的平均年龄为 31.9 岁,其中女性 345 人(76.8%),白人 384 人(85.5%)。随访时间中位数为 15.9 年。在调整后的混合模型中,同侧复发次数越多,视觉结果越差,包括视力(平均差 [MD],最小分辨角单位的对数,0.20;95% 置信区间 [CI],≥2 次与无同侧复发相比,0.15 至 0.25)、对比敏感度(MD,-1.14线;95% CI,≥2对同侧无复发为-1.54至-0.73)、视野平均偏差(MD,-3.57分贝;95% CI,≥2对同侧无复发为-4.38至-2.76)和色觉(MD,1.94个误差分;95% CI,≥2对同侧无复发为0.74至3.14):结论:复发次数越多,视觉效果越差。结论:复发次数的增加与视力预后的恶化有关。初次发病后,必须采取更积极的治疗措施以防止复发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
223
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Official journal of the Canadian Ophthalmological Society. The Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology (CJO) is the official journal of the Canadian Ophthalmological Society and is committed to timely publication of original, peer-reviewed ophthalmology and vision science articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信