Associations Between Self-Reported Cocaine Use Patterns and Cocaine and Its Metabolites in Hair: Implications for Clinical and Forensic Practices.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Simon Grison, Lydia Johnson-Ferguson, Matthias Vonmoos, Markus R Baumgartner, Boris B Quednow
{"title":"Associations Between Self-Reported Cocaine Use Patterns and Cocaine and Its Metabolites in Hair: Implications for Clinical and Forensic Practices.","authors":"Simon Grison, Lydia Johnson-Ferguson, Matthias Vonmoos, Markus R Baumgartner, Boris B Quednow","doi":"10.1002/dta.3825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In forensic toxicology, it has been debated if hair testing allows an estimation of the intensity of cocaine use-an assumption that may have risen because self-reports in a forensic setting are of uncertain validity per se. We therefore investigated the relationship between self-reported cocaine use and cocaine hair concentrations (including its main metabolites benzoylecgonine and norcocaine) in chronic cocaine users voluntary participating in psychiatric study settings. Additionally, we tested whether hair testing can distinguish between individuals with and without a diagnosis of cocaine dependency. Cocaine users (N = 195) from three independent experimental studies reported their average powder cocaine consumption in g/week over the last 3-4 months in an interview and provided a 3- to 4-cm hair sample assayed with liquid chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry. Moreover, study participants were assessed with the Structured Clinical Interview (SCID-IV) for psychiatric diagnoses. Using linear regression models, we found a robust correlation between cocaine<sub>total</sub> (sum of cocaine and metabolites) hair concentration and self-reported cocaine use in g/week (r<sub>cocainetotal</sub> = 0.47, p < 0.001), indicating that 1000 pg/mg cocaine<sub>total</sub> corresponded to a use of 0.80 g/week (confidence interval [95%]: 0.56-1.07 g/week). In logistic regression models, cocaine<sub>total</sub> hair concentration predicted cocaine dependency with a sensitivity of 0.79 and a specificity of 0.65 (threshold 0.5), suggesting its acceptable capacity to distinguish dependent from non-dependent cocaine users. The findings may have significant implications for forensic and clinical practices, encouraging the use of hair analysis as a potential tool for monitoring cocaine use and dependence.</p>","PeriodicalId":160,"journal":{"name":"Drug Testing and Analysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Testing and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.3825","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In forensic toxicology, it has been debated if hair testing allows an estimation of the intensity of cocaine use-an assumption that may have risen because self-reports in a forensic setting are of uncertain validity per se. We therefore investigated the relationship between self-reported cocaine use and cocaine hair concentrations (including its main metabolites benzoylecgonine and norcocaine) in chronic cocaine users voluntary participating in psychiatric study settings. Additionally, we tested whether hair testing can distinguish between individuals with and without a diagnosis of cocaine dependency. Cocaine users (N = 195) from three independent experimental studies reported their average powder cocaine consumption in g/week over the last 3-4 months in an interview and provided a 3- to 4-cm hair sample assayed with liquid chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry. Moreover, study participants were assessed with the Structured Clinical Interview (SCID-IV) for psychiatric diagnoses. Using linear regression models, we found a robust correlation between cocainetotal (sum of cocaine and metabolites) hair concentration and self-reported cocaine use in g/week (rcocainetotal = 0.47, p < 0.001), indicating that 1000 pg/mg cocainetotal corresponded to a use of 0.80 g/week (confidence interval [95%]: 0.56-1.07 g/week). In logistic regression models, cocainetotal hair concentration predicted cocaine dependency with a sensitivity of 0.79 and a specificity of 0.65 (threshold 0.5), suggesting its acceptable capacity to distinguish dependent from non-dependent cocaine users. The findings may have significant implications for forensic and clinical practices, encouraging the use of hair analysis as a potential tool for monitoring cocaine use and dependence.

自我报告的可卡因使用模式与头发中的可卡因及其代谢物之间的关联:对临床和法医实践的启示。
在法医毒理学中,人们一直在争论毛发检测是否可以估算出可卡因的使用强度--这一假设可能是由于法医环境中的自我报告本身具有不确定性而产生的。因此,我们调查了自愿参加精神病学研究的长期可卡因使用者自我报告的可卡因使用情况与可卡因毛发浓度(包括其主要代谢物苯甲酰可待因和去甲可待因)之间的关系。此外,我们还测试了毛发检测是否能区分有无可卡因依赖诊断的个体。来自三项独立实验研究的可卡因使用者(N = 195)在访谈中报告了他们在过去 3-4 个月中的平均可卡因粉末消费量(以克/周为单位),并提供了一份 3-4 厘米长的毛发样本,通过液相色谱串联质谱法进行检测。此外,研究参与者还接受了结构化临床访谈(SCID-IV)的精神病诊断评估。通过线性回归模型,我们发现头发中的可卡因总浓度(可卡因和代谢物的总和)与自我报告的可卡因使用量(克/周)之间存在密切的相关性(rcocainetotal = 0.47,p total 相当于 0.80 克/周(置信区间 [95%]:0.56-1.07 克/周)。在逻辑回归模型中,可卡因毛发总浓度预测可卡因依赖性的灵敏度为 0.79,特异性为 0.65(阈值为 0.5),这表明其区分依赖性和非依赖性可卡因使用者的能力是可以接受的。这些发现可能对法医和临床实践具有重要意义,鼓励将毛发分析作为监测可卡因使用和依赖性的潜在工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drug Testing and Analysis
Drug Testing and Analysis BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS-CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
24.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: As the incidence of drugs escalates in 21st century living, their detection and analysis have become increasingly important. Sport, the workplace, crime investigation, homeland security, the pharmaceutical industry and the environment are just some of the high profile arenas in which analytical testing has provided an important investigative tool for uncovering the presence of extraneous substances. In addition to the usual publishing fare of primary research articles, case reports and letters, Drug Testing and Analysis offers a unique combination of; ‘How to’ material such as ‘Tutorials’ and ‘Reviews’, Speculative pieces (‘Commentaries’ and ‘Perspectives'', providing a broader scientific and social context to the aspects of analytical testing), ‘Annual banned substance reviews’ (delivering a critical evaluation of the methods used in the characterization of established and newly outlawed compounds). Rather than focus on the application of a single technique, Drug Testing and Analysis employs a unique multidisciplinary approach to the field of controversial compound determination. Papers discussing chromatography, mass spectrometry, immunological approaches, 1D/2D gel electrophoresis, to name just a few select methods, are welcomed where their application is related to any of the six key topics listed below.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信