Examining Use of the Schoolwide Expectations Survey for Specific Settings to Build Expectation Matrices: A Pilot Study

IF 1.4 3区心理学 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL

Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI:10.1177/10983007241276777

David James Royer, Katie Scarlett Lane Pelton, Kathleen Lynne Lane, Wendy Peia Oakes

{"title":"Examining Use of the Schoolwide Expectations Survey for Specific Settings to Build Expectation Matrices: A Pilot Study","authors":"David James Royer, Katie Scarlett Lane Pelton, Kathleen Lynne Lane, Wendy Peia Oakes","doi":"10.1177/10983007241276777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Schoolwide Expectations Survey for Specific Settings (SESSS) is a free-access tool school leadership teams can use to gather opinions from faculty and staff regarding what student behaviors are critical for success in various school settings. While the SESSS has been used for over a decade to inform the building of schoolwide expectation matrix as part of their Comprehensive, Integrated, Three-Tiered model of prevention, little is known about the extent to which data from the SESSS informs the actual building of schoolwide expectation matrices. In this pilot descriptive study, we examined SESSS data from 10 elementary, middle, and high schools from two Midwestern districts in the United State to determine how much and which data from the SESSS were included in their expectation matrices. Using a standardized rubric to score each school’s inclusion rate of SESSS items, results indicated all schools included most items rated as critical for success by 75% or more faculty and staff. We discuss implications and future directions.","PeriodicalId":47652,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007241276777","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Schoolwide Expectations Survey for Specific Settings (SESSS) is a free-access tool school leadership teams can use to gather opinions from faculty and staff regarding what student behaviors are critical for success in various school settings. While the SESSS has been used for over a decade to inform the building of schoolwide expectation matrix as part of their Comprehensive, Integrated, Three-Tiered model of prevention, little is known about the extent to which data from the SESSS informs the actual building of schoolwide expectation matrices. In this pilot descriptive study, we examined SESSS data from 10 elementary, middle, and high schools from two Midwestern districts in the United State to determine how much and which data from the SESSS were included in their expectation matrices. Using a standardized rubric to score each school’s inclusion rate of SESSS items, results indicated all schools included most items rated as critical for success by 75% or more faculty and staff. We discuss implications and future directions.

查看原文本刊更多论文

研究在特定环境中使用全校期望调查来构建期望矩阵：试点研究

针对特定环境的全校期望调查（SESSS）是一种免费使用的工具，学校领导团队可以用它来收集教职员工的意见，了解在不同的学校环境中，哪些学生行为对成功至关重要。尽管十多年来，SESSS 一直被用来为构建全校范围的期望矩阵提供信息，作为其全面、综合、三层预防模式的一部分，但人们对 SESSS 的数据在多大程度上为实际构建全校范围的期望矩阵提供了信息却知之甚少。在这项试验性描述性研究中，我们检查了来自美国中西部两个地区的 10 所小学、初中和高中的 SESSS 数据，以确定他们的期望矩阵中包含了多少 SESSS 数据以及哪些数据。使用标准化的评分标准对每所学校的 SESSS 项目纳入率进行评分，结果表明所有学校都纳入了大多数被 75% 或更多教职员工评为对成功至关重要的项目。我们讨论了影响和未来的方向。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions Multiple-

CiteScore

4.90

自引率

14.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： ...offers sound, research-based principles of positive behavior support for use in school, home and community settings with people with challenges in behavioral adaptation. Regular features include empirical research; discussion, literature reviews, and conceptual papers; programs, practices, and innovations; forum; and media reviews.