Clinical research updates

IF 6.8 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Marinos Kyriakopoulos, Polyvios Christofi, Katerina Tselika, Asimina Paleologou
{"title":"Clinical research updates","authors":"Marinos Kyriakopoulos,&nbsp;Polyvios Christofi,&nbsp;Katerina Tselika,&nbsp;Asimina Paleologou","doi":"10.1111/camh.12739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Polyvios Christofi</p><p>National and Kapodistrian University of Athens</p><p>Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) are prevalent, lifelong neurodevelopmental disorders associated with significant behavioural, academic, emotional, and adaptive challenges. These conditions are more common in males, exhibit high heritability, and have a complex aetiology. Furthermore, they frequently co-occur with estimates of 30–50% of individuals with ASD having ADHD symptoms, and two-thirds of individuals with ADHD having ASD symptoms. This suggests shared developmental pathways and risk factors that have not been adequately explored as most research addresses these conditions separately.</p><p>Lebeña and colleagues (2024) aimed to identify pre- and perinatal risk factors and, for the first time, consider early environmental psychosocial exposures associated with ADHD, ASD, and their co-occurrence. Data were collected from the ABIS-study (All Babies in Southeast Sweden) cohort, which included 16,365 children born between 1997 and 1999, with a 22-year follow-up period. Diagnoses were obtained from the Swedish National Diagnosis Register. The study found cumulative incidences of 4.6% for ADHD, 1.7% for ASD and 1.1% for their co-occurrence. Being male was a significant predictor for all three outcomes with a male-to-female ratio of 2:1 for both ADHD and ASD, compared to 3:1 reported in previous studies. ADHD showed significant associations with a family history of autoimmune diseases, preterm birth, lower birth weight, younger parental age, low-parental education, single-parent households, low-household income, maternal smoking and tobacco exposure at one year of age. There were significant associations with serious life events during pregnancy, and shorter breastfeeding duration compared to both control and ASD groups. Statistically independent ADHD predictors were being male, lower household income, lower maternal education, younger mother, maternal smoking, serious life events during pregnancy, lower paternal education and short breastfeeding duration. ASD was associated with maternal disease, infections during pregnancy, vaginal delivery compared to caesarean section, maternal age over 36 years, low-maternal education and low-household income. Statistically independent ASD predictors were being male, lower household income, and lower maternal education together with paternal Swedish nationality. The co-occurrence group was associated with higher prevalence of autoimmune diseases in the family, preterm births, low-parental education, single parent, low-household income, lack of support during pregnancy, lack of security for mother and child, maternal smoking and serious life events at 1 year of age. Statistically independent predictors of the co-occurrence were being male, lower household income and family history of autoimmune disorders.</p><p>The study's strengths included its large, population-based sample and long follow-up period, which enabled robust statistical analysis. Limitations included the lack of data on family history, which might have provided additional insights into genetic influences. The reliance on parental reports for some data may have introduced recall bias, though this was mitigated by cross-referencing with medical records. In conclusion, the study suggests that ADHD, ASD, and their co-occurrence have distinct but overlapping aetiologies, with ADHD possibly being more influenced by environmental psychosocial factors than ASD. The findings highlighted the importance of early-life interventions such as supporting families facing socioeconomic challenges to potentially reduce the burden of these disorders.</p><p>\n <b>Reference</b>\n </p><p>Lebeña, A., Faresjö, Å., Jones, M.P., Bengtsson, F., Faresjö, T., Ludvigsson, J. (2024). Early environmental predictors for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and their co-occurrence: The prospective ABIS-study. <i>Science Reports</i> 14, 14759.</p><p>Katerina Tselika</p><p>National and Kapodistrian University of Athens</p><p>Being able to identify early in life children who are at risk of persistent language disorders at a later age is of major importance, because early speech and language intervention may positively contribute to their later sociobehavioural, academic, emotional and quality-of-life outcomes.</p><p>Gasparini and colleagues (2023) aimed to identify preschool indicators that predict language outcomes in late childhood. They used the early Language Victoria Study (ELVS), a longitudinal cohort study (<i>n</i> = 1910) tracking language and communication from infancy to adolescence. Children were recruited from 8-months old, from different socioeconomic status strata of Melbourne, Victoria, through the Maternal and Child Health Service, hearing screening visits and press advertising. The sample excluded children who were diagnosed at 8-months old as having a disability, which would probably interfere later with their language development and parents whose level of English language was not sufficient to complete the questionnaires. Children had been assessed in 11 waves (ages 8 months to 13 years), and waves 1–4 were used to identify language predictors in the current study (ages 8, 12, 24 and 36 months). Different questionnaires for each age, regarding children's behaviour, symbolic play, language usage, home and family environment and parental stress, were employed. At age 11, 839 children had been retained and assessed for their language skills using the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals, Fourth Edition, Australian version (CELF-4), a standardized test for identifying children with low-language abilities. SuperLearrner algorithm was also used to estimate the accuracy of the selected set of predictors on language outcomes at that age.</p><p>The analysis had 1990 variables, 182 at 8 months, 644 at 12 months, 916 at 24 months and 248 at 36 months. A random forest, tree-based machine-learning method, separately for each collection wave, was run to estimate the importance of the variables. At 24 months, seven predictors related to vocabulary, symbolic play, pragmatics and behaviour yielded 73% sensitivity and 77% specificity for predicting low-language abilities at 11 years. At 36 months, 7 predictors relating to morphosyntax, vocabulary, parent – child interactions, and parental stress yielded 75% sensitivity and 85% specificity for the same outcome. No measures with satisfactory accuracy at 8 and 12 months were identified. The importance of this investigation lies in the fact that two short sets of questions, answered by parents in less than a minute, when their children are at a very young age may accurately predict language abilities in late childhood.</p><p>The study has many strengths including the applicability of results, the fast administration of the questionnaire, the robust sampling methodology, the large cohort of participants and the possibility of replication in a different cohort. Limitations include the low-retention rate of participants and the possible inherent subjectivity in using parent-reported questionnaires.</p><p>\n <b>Reference</b>\n </p><p>Gasparini, L., Shepherd, D. A., Bavin, E. L., Eadie, P., Reilly, S., Morgan, A. T., &amp; Wake, M. (2023). Using machine-learning methods to identify early-life predictors of 11-year language outcome. <i>Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry</i>, 64, 1242–1252.</p><p>Asimina Paleologou</p><p>National and Kapodistrian University of Athens</p><p>Depression is a prevalent mental disorder among children and adolescents. Better understanding of the relationship between depression and cognitive difficulties is important for the prevention, management and long-term outcomes of individuals affected by these conditions. Most studies focusing on this association concern the adult population.</p><p>Schumacher and colleagues (2024) conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, which aimed to provide an overview of the existing literature regarding cognitive functioning in depressed children and adolescents. The study followed strict guidelines, including the Joanna Briggs Institute Systematic Review Guidelines and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist. It included only paediatric subjects (up to 18 years old) with a current diagnosis of clinical depression according to standardized and validated diagnostic criteria (International Classification of Diseases, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders). Cognition was measured in one of five domains: memory, attention, executive function, language and processing speed.</p><p>The authors identified 17 studies that met the inclusion criteria, which were cross-sectional (<i>n</i> = 15), longitudinal (<i>n</i> = 1) or interventional (<i>n</i> = 1) with a total number of 13,567 children (mean age 13.8 ± 2.2 years; 60% female). The majority of the studies focused on memory and attention. Children and adolescents with depression were found to exhibit lower scores on tests of cognitive functioning compared to control samples, specifically on tests of working memory, long-term memory, attention, executive function and language. No differences were found in short-term memory and in processing speed.</p><p>The strengths of this systematic review and meta-analysis include its specific focus on children and adolescents and its robust study size and sample size. Limitations include the fact that cognitive domains were selected according to literature guidelines, which may lead to overlapping results between cognitive domains, the lack of commonly agreed cognitive tests across different studies and the exclusion of subjects with co-morbid neurological conditions or intellectual disability.</p><p>In conclusion, this study highlighted that depressed children and adolescents are at risk for several cognitive impairments. Τhere is a need for better studying the link between depression and cognitive functioning in children and adolescents. Understanding their interconnection is likely to assist in the development of more effective treatments taking into account not only affective but also cognitive symptoms of depression.</p><p>\n <b>Reference</b>\n </p><p>Schumacher, A., Campisi, S.C., Khalfan, A.F., Merriman, K., Williams, T.C., Korczak, D.J (2024). Cognitive functioning in children and adolescents with depression: Α systematic review and meta-analysis. <i>European Neuropsychopharmacology</i>, 79, 49–58.</p><p>No ethical approval was required for these updates.</p>","PeriodicalId":49291,"journal":{"name":"Child and Adolescent Mental Health","volume":"29 4","pages":"404-406"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/camh.12739","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child and Adolescent Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/camh.12739","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Polyvios Christofi

National and Kapodistrian University of Athens

Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) are prevalent, lifelong neurodevelopmental disorders associated with significant behavioural, academic, emotional, and adaptive challenges. These conditions are more common in males, exhibit high heritability, and have a complex aetiology. Furthermore, they frequently co-occur with estimates of 30–50% of individuals with ASD having ADHD symptoms, and two-thirds of individuals with ADHD having ASD symptoms. This suggests shared developmental pathways and risk factors that have not been adequately explored as most research addresses these conditions separately.

Lebeña and colleagues (2024) aimed to identify pre- and perinatal risk factors and, for the first time, consider early environmental psychosocial exposures associated with ADHD, ASD, and their co-occurrence. Data were collected from the ABIS-study (All Babies in Southeast Sweden) cohort, which included 16,365 children born between 1997 and 1999, with a 22-year follow-up period. Diagnoses were obtained from the Swedish National Diagnosis Register. The study found cumulative incidences of 4.6% for ADHD, 1.7% for ASD and 1.1% for their co-occurrence. Being male was a significant predictor for all three outcomes with a male-to-female ratio of 2:1 for both ADHD and ASD, compared to 3:1 reported in previous studies. ADHD showed significant associations with a family history of autoimmune diseases, preterm birth, lower birth weight, younger parental age, low-parental education, single-parent households, low-household income, maternal smoking and tobacco exposure at one year of age. There were significant associations with serious life events during pregnancy, and shorter breastfeeding duration compared to both control and ASD groups. Statistically independent ADHD predictors were being male, lower household income, lower maternal education, younger mother, maternal smoking, serious life events during pregnancy, lower paternal education and short breastfeeding duration. ASD was associated with maternal disease, infections during pregnancy, vaginal delivery compared to caesarean section, maternal age over 36 years, low-maternal education and low-household income. Statistically independent ASD predictors were being male, lower household income, and lower maternal education together with paternal Swedish nationality. The co-occurrence group was associated with higher prevalence of autoimmune diseases in the family, preterm births, low-parental education, single parent, low-household income, lack of support during pregnancy, lack of security for mother and child, maternal smoking and serious life events at 1 year of age. Statistically independent predictors of the co-occurrence were being male, lower household income and family history of autoimmune disorders.

The study's strengths included its large, population-based sample and long follow-up period, which enabled robust statistical analysis. Limitations included the lack of data on family history, which might have provided additional insights into genetic influences. The reliance on parental reports for some data may have introduced recall bias, though this was mitigated by cross-referencing with medical records. In conclusion, the study suggests that ADHD, ASD, and their co-occurrence have distinct but overlapping aetiologies, with ADHD possibly being more influenced by environmental psychosocial factors than ASD. The findings highlighted the importance of early-life interventions such as supporting families facing socioeconomic challenges to potentially reduce the burden of these disorders.

Reference

Lebeña, A., Faresjö, Å., Jones, M.P., Bengtsson, F., Faresjö, T., Ludvigsson, J. (2024). Early environmental predictors for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and their co-occurrence: The prospective ABIS-study. Science Reports 14, 14759.

Katerina Tselika

National and Kapodistrian University of Athens

Being able to identify early in life children who are at risk of persistent language disorders at a later age is of major importance, because early speech and language intervention may positively contribute to their later sociobehavioural, academic, emotional and quality-of-life outcomes.

Gasparini and colleagues (2023) aimed to identify preschool indicators that predict language outcomes in late childhood. They used the early Language Victoria Study (ELVS), a longitudinal cohort study (n = 1910) tracking language and communication from infancy to adolescence. Children were recruited from 8-months old, from different socioeconomic status strata of Melbourne, Victoria, through the Maternal and Child Health Service, hearing screening visits and press advertising. The sample excluded children who were diagnosed at 8-months old as having a disability, which would probably interfere later with their language development and parents whose level of English language was not sufficient to complete the questionnaires. Children had been assessed in 11 waves (ages 8 months to 13 years), and waves 1–4 were used to identify language predictors in the current study (ages 8, 12, 24 and 36 months). Different questionnaires for each age, regarding children's behaviour, symbolic play, language usage, home and family environment and parental stress, were employed. At age 11, 839 children had been retained and assessed for their language skills using the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals, Fourth Edition, Australian version (CELF-4), a standardized test for identifying children with low-language abilities. SuperLearrner algorithm was also used to estimate the accuracy of the selected set of predictors on language outcomes at that age.

The analysis had 1990 variables, 182 at 8 months, 644 at 12 months, 916 at 24 months and 248 at 36 months. A random forest, tree-based machine-learning method, separately for each collection wave, was run to estimate the importance of the variables. At 24 months, seven predictors related to vocabulary, symbolic play, pragmatics and behaviour yielded 73% sensitivity and 77% specificity for predicting low-language abilities at 11 years. At 36 months, 7 predictors relating to morphosyntax, vocabulary, parent – child interactions, and parental stress yielded 75% sensitivity and 85% specificity for the same outcome. No measures with satisfactory accuracy at 8 and 12 months were identified. The importance of this investigation lies in the fact that two short sets of questions, answered by parents in less than a minute, when their children are at a very young age may accurately predict language abilities in late childhood.

The study has many strengths including the applicability of results, the fast administration of the questionnaire, the robust sampling methodology, the large cohort of participants and the possibility of replication in a different cohort. Limitations include the low-retention rate of participants and the possible inherent subjectivity in using parent-reported questionnaires.

Reference

Gasparini, L., Shepherd, D. A., Bavin, E. L., Eadie, P., Reilly, S., Morgan, A. T., & Wake, M. (2023). Using machine-learning methods to identify early-life predictors of 11-year language outcome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 64, 1242–1252.

Asimina Paleologou

National and Kapodistrian University of Athens

Depression is a prevalent mental disorder among children and adolescents. Better understanding of the relationship between depression and cognitive difficulties is important for the prevention, management and long-term outcomes of individuals affected by these conditions. Most studies focusing on this association concern the adult population.

Schumacher and colleagues (2024) conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, which aimed to provide an overview of the existing literature regarding cognitive functioning in depressed children and adolescents. The study followed strict guidelines, including the Joanna Briggs Institute Systematic Review Guidelines and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist. It included only paediatric subjects (up to 18 years old) with a current diagnosis of clinical depression according to standardized and validated diagnostic criteria (International Classification of Diseases, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders). Cognition was measured in one of five domains: memory, attention, executive function, language and processing speed.

The authors identified 17 studies that met the inclusion criteria, which were cross-sectional (n = 15), longitudinal (n = 1) or interventional (n = 1) with a total number of 13,567 children (mean age 13.8 ± 2.2 years; 60% female). The majority of the studies focused on memory and attention. Children and adolescents with depression were found to exhibit lower scores on tests of cognitive functioning compared to control samples, specifically on tests of working memory, long-term memory, attention, executive function and language. No differences were found in short-term memory and in processing speed.

The strengths of this systematic review and meta-analysis include its specific focus on children and adolescents and its robust study size and sample size. Limitations include the fact that cognitive domains were selected according to literature guidelines, which may lead to overlapping results between cognitive domains, the lack of commonly agreed cognitive tests across different studies and the exclusion of subjects with co-morbid neurological conditions or intellectual disability.

In conclusion, this study highlighted that depressed children and adolescents are at risk for several cognitive impairments. Τhere is a need for better studying the link between depression and cognitive functioning in children and adolescents. Understanding their interconnection is likely to assist in the development of more effective treatments taking into account not only affective but also cognitive symptoms of depression.

Reference

Schumacher, A., Campisi, S.C., Khalfan, A.F., Merriman, K., Williams, T.C., Korczak, D.J (2024). Cognitive functioning in children and adolescents with depression: Α systematic review and meta-analysis. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 79, 49–58.

No ethical approval was required for these updates.

临床研究最新进展
样本中排除了 8 个月大时被诊断为残疾的儿童(这可能会影响他们以后的语言发展),也排除了英语水平不足以完成问卷的家长。儿童共接受了 11 次评估(8 个月至 13 岁),在本次研究中,第 1-4 次评估用于确定语言预测因素(8、12、24 和 36 个月)。每个年龄段都采用了不同的调查问卷,内容涉及儿童行为、象征性游戏、语言使用、家庭环境和父母压力。11 岁时,有 839 名儿童留了下来,并使用语言基础临床评估第四版澳大利亚版(CELF-4)对他们的语言能力进行了评估。该分析有 1990 个变量,其中 182 个是 8 个月时的变量,644 个是 12 个月时的变量,916 个是 24 个月时的变量,248 个是 36 个月时的变量。随机森林、基于树的机器学习方法分别用于每个收集波段,以估计变量的重要性。在 24 个月时,与词汇、符号游戏、语用和行为有关的 7 个预测因子对 11 岁时语言能力低下的预测灵敏度为 73%,特异度为 77%。在 36 个月时,与语法、词汇、亲子互动和父母压力有关的 7 个预测因子对同一结果的灵敏度为 75%,特异度为 85%。在 8 个月和 12 个月时,没有发现准确性令人满意的测量指标。这项调查的重要性在于,在孩子很小的时候,由家长在不到一分钟的时间内回答两组简短的问题,可能会准确预测儿童后期的语言能力。这项研究有很多优点,包括结果的适用性、问卷的快速发放、可靠的抽样方法、大量的参与者以及在不同群体中复制的可能性。不足之处包括参与者的保留率较低,以及使用家长报告问卷可能存在固有的主观性。 参考文献 Gasparini, L., Shepherd, D. A., Bavin, E. L., Eadie, P., Reilly, S., Morgan, A. T., &amp; Wake, M. (2023).使用机器学习方法识别早期生活中预测 11 年语言结果的因素。Asimina PaleologouNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens抑郁症是儿童和青少年中普遍存在的精神障碍。更好地了解抑郁症与认知障碍之间的关系,对于预防、管理和长期治疗受抑郁症影响的人非常重要。Schumacher 及其同事(2024 年)进行了一项系统回顾和荟萃分析,旨在概述有关抑郁儿童和青少年认知功能的现有文献。该研究严格遵循了包括乔安娜-布里格斯研究所系统综述指南和系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)清单在内的指导方针。研究对象只包括根据标准化的有效诊断标准(《国际疾病分类》、《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》)确诊患有临床抑郁症的儿童(18 岁以下)。作者确定了 17 项符合纳入标准的研究,包括横断面研究(15 项)、纵向研究(1 项)或干预性研究(1 项),共有 13,567 名儿童(平均年龄为 13.8 ± 2.2 岁;60% 为女性)参与了这些研究。大多数研究侧重于记忆力和注意力。研究发现,与对照样本相比,患有抑郁症的儿童和青少年在认知功能测试中得分较低,特别是在工作记忆、长期记忆、注意力、执行功能和语言测试中。本系统综述和荟萃分析报告的优点包括:特别关注儿童和青少年,研究规模和样本量大。不足之处包括:认知领域是根据文献指南选择的,这可能会导致认知领域之间的结果重叠;不同的研究缺乏共同认可的认知测试;排除了合并神经系统疾病或智力障碍的受试者。 总之,这项研究强调,患有抑郁症的儿童和青少年有可能出现多种认知障碍。有必要更好地研究儿童和青少年抑郁与认知功能之间的联系。了解它们之间的相互联系可能有助于开发更有效的治疗方法,不仅考虑抑郁症的情感症状,也考虑其认知症状。 参考文献 Schumacher, A.、Campisi, S.C.、Khalfan, A.F.、Merriman, K.、Williams, T.C.、Korczak, D.J (2024)。儿童和青少年抑郁症患者的认知功能:系统综述与荟萃分析》。欧洲神经精神药理学》(European Neuropsychopharmacology),79, 49-58。这些更新无需伦理批准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Child and Adolescent Mental Health
Child and Adolescent Mental Health PEDIATRICS-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
3.30%
发文量
77
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Child and Adolescent Mental Health (CAMH) publishes high quality, peer-reviewed child and adolescent mental health services research of relevance to academics, clinicians and commissioners internationally. The journal''s principal aim is to foster evidence-based clinical practice and clinically orientated research among clinicians and health services researchers working with children and adolescents, parents and their families in relation to or with a particular interest in mental health. CAMH publishes reviews, original articles, and pilot reports of innovative approaches, interventions, clinical methods and service developments. The journal has regular sections on Measurement Issues, Innovations in Practice, Global Child Mental Health and Humanities. All published papers should be of direct relevance to mental health practitioners and clearly draw out clinical implications for the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信