Professional pharmacy Services' outcomes performance measurement: A narrative review

IF 1.8 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Lígia Reis , João Gregório
{"title":"Professional pharmacy Services' outcomes performance measurement: A narrative review","authors":"Lígia Reis ,&nbsp;João Gregório","doi":"10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Professional pharmacy services are widely recognized for their role in promoting patient health and ensuring optimal medication therapy outcomes. Community pharmacies and pharmacists need to assess professional services' performance at patient level and demonstrate their value to stakeholders. To do so is important to understand which outcome performance indicators are currently being used and how added value is proven.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To identify performance indicators that measure patients' outcomes and demonstrate value of professional pharmacy services.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A narrative review was performed based on a systematic search in Pubmed and Scopus databases since year 2000. Manually search was also conducted in Google Scholar and <span><span>Google.com</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>. Inclusion criteria followed the PCC mnemonic in which Population is “community pharmacies”, Context is “pharmaceutical care, professional pharmaceutical services or pharmaceutical interventions” and Concept is “key performance indicators, or performance measures or clinical indicators”. English, Spanish or Portuguese language were accepted.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All types of papers were included, adding up to a total of 12 papers. The publication of papers on this subject has increased in the last decade. Outcomes indicators identified were based in different frameworks, mainly linked to quality, and were clearly outlined. Disease and therapy management were the most evaluated services. Indicators were identified across 8 different domains corresponding, predominantly, to outputs rather than outcomes. Measurement is mainly conducted under the auspices of coalitions, alliances, government and payers reflecting their perspectives and based on easy-to-retrieve pharmacy data and information.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>A paradigm shift is needed, so that performance indicators are based on more appropriate frameworks to measure patient level outcomes and value assignment of professional pharmacy services. By providing robust evidence of the impact of pharmacist interventions on patient outcomes, community pharmacists can advocate for the integration, expansion, and recognition of pharmacist-led services within the broader healthcare system.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73003,"journal":{"name":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100533"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276624001306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Professional pharmacy services are widely recognized for their role in promoting patient health and ensuring optimal medication therapy outcomes. Community pharmacies and pharmacists need to assess professional services' performance at patient level and demonstrate their value to stakeholders. To do so is important to understand which outcome performance indicators are currently being used and how added value is proven.

Objective

To identify performance indicators that measure patients' outcomes and demonstrate value of professional pharmacy services.

Methods

A narrative review was performed based on a systematic search in Pubmed and Scopus databases since year 2000. Manually search was also conducted in Google Scholar and Google.com. Inclusion criteria followed the PCC mnemonic in which Population is “community pharmacies”, Context is “pharmaceutical care, professional pharmaceutical services or pharmaceutical interventions” and Concept is “key performance indicators, or performance measures or clinical indicators”. English, Spanish or Portuguese language were accepted.

Results

All types of papers were included, adding up to a total of 12 papers. The publication of papers on this subject has increased in the last decade. Outcomes indicators identified were based in different frameworks, mainly linked to quality, and were clearly outlined. Disease and therapy management were the most evaluated services. Indicators were identified across 8 different domains corresponding, predominantly, to outputs rather than outcomes. Measurement is mainly conducted under the auspices of coalitions, alliances, government and payers reflecting their perspectives and based on easy-to-retrieve pharmacy data and information.

Conclusions

A paradigm shift is needed, so that performance indicators are based on more appropriate frameworks to measure patient level outcomes and value assignment of professional pharmacy services. By providing robust evidence of the impact of pharmacist interventions on patient outcomes, community pharmacists can advocate for the integration, expansion, and recognition of pharmacist-led services within the broader healthcare system.
专业药房服务的成果绩效衡量:叙述性综述
背景专业药学服务在促进患者健康和确保最佳药物治疗效果方面的作用得到了广泛认可。社区药房和药剂师需要评估专业服务在患者层面的表现,并向利益相关者展示其价值。为此,了解目前正在使用哪些结果绩效指标以及如何证明其附加值非常重要。方法根据自 2000 年以来在 Pubmed 和 Scopus 数据库中的系统性搜索,进行了叙述性综述。还在 Google Scholar 和 Google.com 上进行了手动搜索。纳入标准采用 PCC 记忆法,其中 Population 指 "社区药房",Context 指 "医药护理、专业医药服务或医药干预",Concept 指 "关键绩效指标、绩效衡量或临床指标"。结果 所有类型的论文均被收录,共计 12 篇。在过去十年中,有关这一主题的论文发表量有所增加。所确定的成果指标基于不同的框架,主要与质量相关,并有明确的概述。疾病和治疗管理是接受评估最多的服务。已确定的指标涉及 8 个不同领域,主要与产出而非成果相关。衡量工作主要在联盟、政府和支付方的支持下进行,反映了他们的观点,并以易于检索的药学数据和信息为基础。通过提供药剂师干预措施对患者疗效影响的有力证据,社区药剂师可以倡导在更广泛的医疗保健系统中整合、扩大和认可药剂师主导的服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信