Unfolding the effectiveness of ecological restoration programs in enhancing vegetation carbon sinks across different climate zones in China

IF 11.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Yunting Shi , Biao Zhang , Li Liang , Shuang Wang , Haiyan Zhang , Hailian Sun , Xiufeng Han
{"title":"Unfolding the effectiveness of ecological restoration programs in enhancing vegetation carbon sinks across different climate zones in China","authors":"Yunting Shi ,&nbsp;Biao Zhang ,&nbsp;Li Liang ,&nbsp;Shuang Wang ,&nbsp;Haiyan Zhang ,&nbsp;Hailian Sun ,&nbsp;Xiufeng Han","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Evaluating the vegetation carbon sink capacity across different climate zones in China is vital for optimizing the ecological restoration management practices and achieving double carbon goals. Based on the land cover and net primary productivity, along with a comprehensive literature review, we developed a vegetation carbon sink (VCS) estimation model at a 500 <em>m</em> × 500 m grid resolution to evaluate the carbon sink capacity of vegetation in China from 2001 to 2020. Results showed that the mean annual VCS<sub>rate</sub> in China was 0.23 Mg C·ha<sup>−1</sup>·yr<sup>−1</sup>, with the annual VCS<sub>total</sub> of 160.71Tg C·yr<sup>−1</sup>. The VCS<sub>rate</sub> was highest in forest (0.75 Mg C·ha<sup>−1</sup>·yr<sup>−1</sup>), followed by shrubland and grassland (0.18 and 0.03 Mg C·ha<sup>−1</sup>·yr<sup>−1</sup>). The VCS<sub>rate</sub> increased at a rate of 15.18%, particularly in the warm temperate zone (WT) and the north subtropical zone (NS), increased by 83.24% and 38.86%, respectively. The ecological restoration programs (ERPs) contributed to 72.29% of the total increase in the national VCS<sub>total</sub> during 20 years. Especially, the shelterbelt program for upper and middle reaches of Yangtze River (SPYT) accounted for 40.69%. Overall, ERPs have the best carbon sequestration effect in the NS and WT, with 52.46 and 48.36 Mg C·ha<sup>−1</sup>·yr<sup>−1</sup> higher than outside ERSs area. Conversely, the VCS effect of ERPs was not significant in the plateau zone, so planting behavior in vulnerable regions should be taken with caution. It is imperative to identify appropriate ecological stewardship measures for future climatic conditions, informed by specific temporal and geographical contexts, to enhance carbon sequestration efficiency. These findings are crucial for guiding ecological protection and restoration strategies and carbon neutrality efforts in China and globally.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 107974"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344924005652","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evaluating the vegetation carbon sink capacity across different climate zones in China is vital for optimizing the ecological restoration management practices and achieving double carbon goals. Based on the land cover and net primary productivity, along with a comprehensive literature review, we developed a vegetation carbon sink (VCS) estimation model at a 500 m × 500 m grid resolution to evaluate the carbon sink capacity of vegetation in China from 2001 to 2020. Results showed that the mean annual VCSrate in China was 0.23 Mg C·ha−1·yr−1, with the annual VCStotal of 160.71Tg C·yr−1. The VCSrate was highest in forest (0.75 Mg C·ha−1·yr−1), followed by shrubland and grassland (0.18 and 0.03 Mg C·ha−1·yr−1). The VCSrate increased at a rate of 15.18%, particularly in the warm temperate zone (WT) and the north subtropical zone (NS), increased by 83.24% and 38.86%, respectively. The ecological restoration programs (ERPs) contributed to 72.29% of the total increase in the national VCStotal during 20 years. Especially, the shelterbelt program for upper and middle reaches of Yangtze River (SPYT) accounted for 40.69%. Overall, ERPs have the best carbon sequestration effect in the NS and WT, with 52.46 and 48.36 Mg C·ha−1·yr−1 higher than outside ERSs area. Conversely, the VCS effect of ERPs was not significant in the plateau zone, so planting behavior in vulnerable regions should be taken with caution. It is imperative to identify appropriate ecological stewardship measures for future climatic conditions, informed by specific temporal and geographical contexts, to enhance carbon sequestration efficiency. These findings are crucial for guiding ecological protection and restoration strategies and carbon neutrality efforts in China and globally.

Abstract Image

揭示中国不同气候带生态恢复项目在提高植被碳汇方面的成效
评估中国不同气候带的植被碳汇能力对于优化生态恢复管理实践和实现双碳目标至关重要。基于土地覆被和净初级生产力,结合文献综述,我们建立了植被碳汇(VCS)估算模型,以500米×500米的网格分辨率评估了2001-2020年中国植被的碳汇能力。结果表明,中国植被碳汇年均值为0.23 Mg C-ha-1-yr-1,年总碳汇量为160.71 Tg C-yr-1。森林的VCS率最高(0.75 Mg C-ha-1-yr-1),其次是灌木林和草地(0.18 Mg C-ha-1-yr-1和0.03 Mg C-ha-1-yr-1)。VCSrate 增长率为 15.18%,尤其是在暖温带(WT)和北亚热带(NS),分别增长了 83.24% 和 38.86%。20 年间,生态恢复计划(ERP)使全国 VC 总量增长了 72.29%。其中,长江中上游防护林计划(SPYT)占 40.69%。总体而言,ERP在NS和WT的固碳效果最好,分别比ERS以外地区高出52.46和48.36 Mg C-ha-1-yr-1。相反,ERPs 在高原区的固碳效果并不显著,因此在脆弱地区的种植行为应谨慎。当务之急是根据具体的时间和地理环境,针对未来的气候条件确定适当的生态管理措施,以提高固碳效率。这些发现对于指导中国乃至全球的生态保护和恢复战略以及碳中和努力至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resources Conservation and Recycling
Resources Conservation and Recycling 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
22.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
625
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns. Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信