Beyond seizure freedom: Reduction in anti-seizure medication after epilepsy surgery

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Rohan Jha , Melissa M.J. Chua , David D. Liu , R. Mark Richardson , Steven Tobochnik , John D. Rolston
{"title":"Beyond seizure freedom: Reduction in anti-seizure medication after epilepsy surgery","authors":"Rohan Jha ,&nbsp;Melissa M.J. Chua ,&nbsp;David D. Liu ,&nbsp;R. Mark Richardson ,&nbsp;Steven Tobochnik ,&nbsp;John D. Rolston","doi":"10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Patients considering therapeutic epilepsy surgery often seek to decrease the number of anti-seizure medications (ASMs) they need. Predicting such reductions remains challenging. Although predictors of seizure freedom after epilepsy surgery are well-established, long-term outcomes remain modest and factors associated with ASM reduction, even in the absence of seizure freedom, may improve surgical planning to align with patient goals.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We studied a large multi-institutional cohort of patients who underwent epilepsy surgery between 2001 and 2022, with a minimum of two years follow-up. Preoperative features, including duration of epilepsy, epilepsy etiology, non-invasive investigation data, and total number of ASMs prescribed immediately prior to surgery were extracted for each patient. Primary endpoints included likelihood of ASM reduction and ASM freedom at multiple post-operative time points up to 15 years and stratified by seizure control.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 250 patients were followed for a median of 6.0 (range 2, 22) years after intracranial EEG (iEEG) surgery. Significant ASM reduction was only observed in those who underwent subsequent resection, whereas those undergoing neuromodulation saw their ASM usage maintained. Engel I outcomes were the strongest driver of ASM reduction. In patients with persistent seizures, patients with lateralized seizure onset zones (SOZs) also achieved sustained ASM reduction over time. Similarly, an increased number of preoperative ASMs also corresponded to a higher likelihood of ASM reduction across all follow-up periods. Other preoperative factors, including seizure etiology, did not independently influence ASM reduction.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Even patients with persistent seizures after epilepsy surgery can observe meaningful ASM reduction during long-term follow-up. ASM reduction may be a relevant secondary outcome measure for epilepsy surgery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11914,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy Research","volume":"208 ","pages":"Article 107473"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920121124001888","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Patients considering therapeutic epilepsy surgery often seek to decrease the number of anti-seizure medications (ASMs) they need. Predicting such reductions remains challenging. Although predictors of seizure freedom after epilepsy surgery are well-established, long-term outcomes remain modest and factors associated with ASM reduction, even in the absence of seizure freedom, may improve surgical planning to align with patient goals.

Methods

We studied a large multi-institutional cohort of patients who underwent epilepsy surgery between 2001 and 2022, with a minimum of two years follow-up. Preoperative features, including duration of epilepsy, epilepsy etiology, non-invasive investigation data, and total number of ASMs prescribed immediately prior to surgery were extracted for each patient. Primary endpoints included likelihood of ASM reduction and ASM freedom at multiple post-operative time points up to 15 years and stratified by seizure control.

Results

A total of 250 patients were followed for a median of 6.0 (range 2, 22) years after intracranial EEG (iEEG) surgery. Significant ASM reduction was only observed in those who underwent subsequent resection, whereas those undergoing neuromodulation saw their ASM usage maintained. Engel I outcomes were the strongest driver of ASM reduction. In patients with persistent seizures, patients with lateralized seizure onset zones (SOZs) also achieved sustained ASM reduction over time. Similarly, an increased number of preoperative ASMs also corresponded to a higher likelihood of ASM reduction across all follow-up periods. Other preoperative factors, including seizure etiology, did not independently influence ASM reduction.

Conclusions

Even patients with persistent seizures after epilepsy surgery can observe meaningful ASM reduction during long-term follow-up. ASM reduction may be a relevant secondary outcome measure for epilepsy surgery.
超越癫痫发作自由:癫痫手术后减少抗癫痫药物用量
导言:考虑接受治疗性癫痫手术的患者通常希望减少所需的抗癫痫药物(ASM)数量。预测这种减少仍然具有挑战性。尽管癫痫手术后癫痫发作自由度的预测因素已经确立,但长期疗效仍然不佳,即使在没有癫痫发作自由度的情况下,与减少抗癫痫药物相关的因素也可能改善手术规划,使之符合患者的目标。方法我们对 2001 年至 2022 年期间接受癫痫手术的大型多机构患者队列进行了研究,随访至少两年。我们提取了每位患者的术前特征,包括癫痫持续时间、癫痫病因、非侵入性检查数据以及手术前立即使用的抗癫痫药物总数。主要终点包括术后多个时间点的 ASM 减少可能性和 ASM 自由度,最长可达 15 年,并根据癫痫发作控制情况进行分层。只有在接受后续切除术的患者中才能观察到 ASM 的显著减少,而接受神经调控术的患者的 ASM 使用量则保持不变。Engel I结果是ASM减少的最大驱动力。在癫痫持续状态患者中,癫痫发作区(SOZ)偏向一侧的患者随着时间的推移也能持续减少 ASM 的使用。同样,术前 ASM 数量的增加也与所有随访期间 ASM 减少的可能性相对应。结论即使是癫痫手术后持续发作的患者,在长期随访期间也能观察到有意义的 ASM 减少。ASM减少可能是癫痫手术的一个相关次要结局指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epilepsy Research
Epilepsy Research 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
143
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Epilepsy Research provides for publication of high quality articles in both basic and clinical epilepsy research, with a special emphasis on translational research that ultimately relates to epilepsy as a human condition. The journal is intended to provide a forum for reporting the best and most rigorous epilepsy research from all disciplines ranging from biophysics and molecular biology to epidemiological and psychosocial research. As such the journal will publish original papers relevant to epilepsy from any scientific discipline and also studies of a multidisciplinary nature. Clinical and experimental research papers adopting fresh conceptual approaches to the study of epilepsy and its treatment are encouraged. The overriding criteria for publication are novelty, significant clinical or experimental relevance, and interest to a multidisciplinary audience in the broad arena of epilepsy. Review articles focused on any topic of epilepsy research will also be considered, but only if they present an exceptionally clear synthesis of current knowledge and future directions of a research area, based on a critical assessment of the available data or on hypotheses that are likely to stimulate more critical thinking and further advances in an area of epilepsy research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信