{"title":"Addressing imbalanced data for machine learning based mineral prospectivity mapping","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.oregeorev.2024.106270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Effective Mineral Prospectivity Mapping (MPM) relies on the ability of Machine Learning (ML) models to extract meaningful patterns from geophysical data. However, in mineral exploration, identifying the presence of mineral deposits is often a rare event compared with the overall geological landscape. This rarity leads to a highly imbalanced dataset, where positive instances (mineralized samples) are considerably less frequent than negative instances (non-mineralized samples). Imbalanced data can potentially bias ML models towards the majority class, leading to inaccurate predictions for the minority class (mineralized samples) which are of primary interest. To address this challenge, we proposed two-level methods in this study. At the data level, we employed imbalanced data handling techniques that operate on the training dataset and change the class distribution. At the algorithmic level, we adjusted the decision threshold of a model to balance the trade-off between false positives and false negatives. Experimental results are collected on a geophysical data from Lapland, Finland. The dataset exhibits a significant class imbalance, comprising 17 positive samples contrasted with <span><math><mrow><mn>1</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>84</mn><mo>×</mo><mn>1</mn><msup><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow><mrow><mn>6</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></math></span> negative samples. We investigate the effect of handling imbalanced data on the performance of four ML models including Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), Random Forest (RF), Decision Tree (DT), and Logistic Regression (LR). From the results, we found that the MLP model achieved the best overall performance, with total accuracy of 97.13% on balanced data using synthetic minority oversampling method. Random forest and DT also performed well, with accuracies of 88.34% and 89.35%, respectively. The implemented methodology of this work is integrated in QGIS as a new toolkit which is called EIS Toolkit <span><span><sup>1</sup></span></span>for MPM.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19644,"journal":{"name":"Ore Geology Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ore Geology Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169136824004037","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Effective Mineral Prospectivity Mapping (MPM) relies on the ability of Machine Learning (ML) models to extract meaningful patterns from geophysical data. However, in mineral exploration, identifying the presence of mineral deposits is often a rare event compared with the overall geological landscape. This rarity leads to a highly imbalanced dataset, where positive instances (mineralized samples) are considerably less frequent than negative instances (non-mineralized samples). Imbalanced data can potentially bias ML models towards the majority class, leading to inaccurate predictions for the minority class (mineralized samples) which are of primary interest. To address this challenge, we proposed two-level methods in this study. At the data level, we employed imbalanced data handling techniques that operate on the training dataset and change the class distribution. At the algorithmic level, we adjusted the decision threshold of a model to balance the trade-off between false positives and false negatives. Experimental results are collected on a geophysical data from Lapland, Finland. The dataset exhibits a significant class imbalance, comprising 17 positive samples contrasted with negative samples. We investigate the effect of handling imbalanced data on the performance of four ML models including Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), Random Forest (RF), Decision Tree (DT), and Logistic Regression (LR). From the results, we found that the MLP model achieved the best overall performance, with total accuracy of 97.13% on balanced data using synthetic minority oversampling method. Random forest and DT also performed well, with accuracies of 88.34% and 89.35%, respectively. The implemented methodology of this work is integrated in QGIS as a new toolkit which is called EIS Toolkit 1for MPM.
期刊介绍:
Ore Geology Reviews aims to familiarize all earth scientists with recent advances in a number of interconnected disciplines related to the study of, and search for, ore deposits. The reviews range from brief to longer contributions, but the journal preferentially publishes manuscripts that fill the niche between the commonly shorter journal articles and the comprehensive book coverages, and thus has a special appeal to many authors and readers.