Reinforcing inequalities: A critical examination of international sanctions and bureaucratic decline in the Global South

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Jeremy Ko , Chun Kai Leung , Chitao Yu
{"title":"Reinforcing inequalities: A critical examination of international sanctions and bureaucratic decline in the Global South","authors":"Jeremy Ko ,&nbsp;Chun Kai Leung ,&nbsp;Chitao Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.resglo.2024.100258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study critically examines the impact of international sanctions on bureaucratic quality in 74 developing countries from 1990 to 2020, highlighting how global governance mechanisms influence domestic institutional capacities. By focusing on the interaction between sanctions and economic crises, the research provides fresh empirical evidence on how external political pressures can inadvertently hinder development trajectories in the Global South. Utilizing a fixed-effect regression methodology with robust controls and addressing endogeneity concerns, the findings reveal that international sanctions—especially multilateral ones from the EU and UN—significantly deteriorate bureaucratic quality, particularly during economic crises. This deterioration undermines state capacity, exacerbates inequalities, and challenges the effectiveness and fairness of sanctions as tools of global governance. The study contributes to debates on global development by demonstrating how sanctions can reinforce global power asymmetries and produce divergent development outcomes. It urges a re-evaluation of sanctions within international policy, advocating for more equitable and context-sensitive approaches that prioritize the institutional integrity and development needs of vulnerable nations. The research underscores the importance of aligning global governance mechanisms with ethical principles and development goals, promoting dialogue and collaboration over punitive measures to achieve a more inclusive and sustainable global development paradigm.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34321,"journal":{"name":"Research in Globalization","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100258"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Globalization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590051X24000674","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study critically examines the impact of international sanctions on bureaucratic quality in 74 developing countries from 1990 to 2020, highlighting how global governance mechanisms influence domestic institutional capacities. By focusing on the interaction between sanctions and economic crises, the research provides fresh empirical evidence on how external political pressures can inadvertently hinder development trajectories in the Global South. Utilizing a fixed-effect regression methodology with robust controls and addressing endogeneity concerns, the findings reveal that international sanctions—especially multilateral ones from the EU and UN—significantly deteriorate bureaucratic quality, particularly during economic crises. This deterioration undermines state capacity, exacerbates inequalities, and challenges the effectiveness and fairness of sanctions as tools of global governance. The study contributes to debates on global development by demonstrating how sanctions can reinforce global power asymmetries and produce divergent development outcomes. It urges a re-evaluation of sanctions within international policy, advocating for more equitable and context-sensitive approaches that prioritize the institutional integrity and development needs of vulnerable nations. The research underscores the importance of aligning global governance mechanisms with ethical principles and development goals, promoting dialogue and collaboration over punitive measures to achieve a more inclusive and sustainable global development paradigm.
强化不平等:对国际制裁和全球南部官僚主义衰落的批判性研究
本研究批判性地考察了 1990 至 2020 年间国际制裁对 74 个发展中国家官僚机构质量的影响,强调了全球治理机制如何影响国内机构能力。通过关注制裁与经济危机之间的相互作用,研究提供了新的经验证据,说明外部政治压力如何在无意中阻碍全球南部的发展轨迹。研究结果表明,国际制裁--尤其是欧盟和联合国的多边制裁--会显著降低官僚机构的质量,尤其是在经济危机期间。这种恶化削弱了国家能力,加剧了不平等,并对制裁作为全球治理工具的有效性和公平性提出了挑战。本研究通过展示制裁如何强化全球权力不对称并产生不同的发展结果,为有关全球发展的讨论做出了贡献。它敦促在国际政策范围内重新评估制裁,倡导采取更公平、对具体情况更敏感的方法,优先考虑脆弱国家的机构完整性和发展需求。研究强调,必须使全球治理机制符合道德原则和发展目标,促进对话与合作,而不是惩罚性措施,以实现更具包容性和可持续性的全球发展模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Research in Globalization
Research in Globalization Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
79 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信