Advanced integration strategies and machine learning-based superstructure optimization for Power-to-Methanol

IF 10.1 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Dat-Nguyen Vo , Meng Qi , Chang-Ha Lee , Xunyuan Yin
{"title":"Advanced integration strategies and machine learning-based superstructure optimization for Power-to-Methanol","authors":"Dat-Nguyen Vo ,&nbsp;Meng Qi ,&nbsp;Chang-Ha Lee ,&nbsp;Xunyuan Yin","doi":"10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Power-to-methanol (PtMe) process faces significant challenges, including high production costs, low energy efficiency, and a lack of systematic and applicable integrated design and superstructure optimization methods. This study proposes advanced integration and machine learning (ML)-based superstructure optimization approaches that aim to enhance the performance of the PtMe process. Alkaline water electrolyzer (AWE), polymer electrolyte membrane electrolyzer (PEM), and solid oxide electrolyzer (SOE) are chosen for investigation due to their high technology readiness levels. The validated mathematical models for these electrolyzers are integrated with other units to form 3 conventional and 12 advanced designs. The conventional designs comprise electrolyzer-based H<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> and CO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>-to-methanol sections. In contrast, the advanced designs integrate these sections with four waste-utility reutilization strategies, including heat (H), heat and steam (HS), heat and power (HP), and heat, steam, and power (HSP) generations. A techno-economic analysis demonstrates the pivotal role of electrolyzers in the PtMe process. Two deep neural networks (DNN) models are developed to represent the superstructure design of the PtMe process. With marginal training and test errors (0.28% and 1.03%), the one-hot vector-DNN (OHV-DNN) model is selected to formulate four optimization problems, identifying the PtMe-SOE-HSP and PtMe-AWE-HSP designs as optimal solutions for minimizing energy consumption and production cost considering carbon tax. The PtMe-AWE and PtMe-SOE designs are the best candidates among the conventional designs. Compared to the optimal conventional designs, the optimal advanced designs improve the techno-economic-environmental performance by 1.8–29.7%. Additionally, compared to the PtMe-AWE-HSP design, the PtMe-SOE-HSP design achieves a 4.3% reduction in net CO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> reduction and a 10.2% reduction in energy consumption. Then, an economic analysis reveals the PtMe-SOE-HSP design as the superior design under scenarios of reduced electrolyzer CAPEX and increased electrolyzer lifetime. These findings are valuable for improving the techno-economic-environmental performance of the PtMe process. Moreover, the proposed integration strategies and ML-based superstructure optimization approach hold the promise for enhancing other power-to-liquid processes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":246,"journal":{"name":"Applied Energy","volume":"378 ","pages":"Article 124731"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261924021147","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Power-to-methanol (PtMe) process faces significant challenges, including high production costs, low energy efficiency, and a lack of systematic and applicable integrated design and superstructure optimization methods. This study proposes advanced integration and machine learning (ML)-based superstructure optimization approaches that aim to enhance the performance of the PtMe process. Alkaline water electrolyzer (AWE), polymer electrolyte membrane electrolyzer (PEM), and solid oxide electrolyzer (SOE) are chosen for investigation due to their high technology readiness levels. The validated mathematical models for these electrolyzers are integrated with other units to form 3 conventional and 12 advanced designs. The conventional designs comprise electrolyzer-based H2 and CO2-to-methanol sections. In contrast, the advanced designs integrate these sections with four waste-utility reutilization strategies, including heat (H), heat and steam (HS), heat and power (HP), and heat, steam, and power (HSP) generations. A techno-economic analysis demonstrates the pivotal role of electrolyzers in the PtMe process. Two deep neural networks (DNN) models are developed to represent the superstructure design of the PtMe process. With marginal training and test errors (0.28% and 1.03%), the one-hot vector-DNN (OHV-DNN) model is selected to formulate four optimization problems, identifying the PtMe-SOE-HSP and PtMe-AWE-HSP designs as optimal solutions for minimizing energy consumption and production cost considering carbon tax. The PtMe-AWE and PtMe-SOE designs are the best candidates among the conventional designs. Compared to the optimal conventional designs, the optimal advanced designs improve the techno-economic-environmental performance by 1.8–29.7%. Additionally, compared to the PtMe-AWE-HSP design, the PtMe-SOE-HSP design achieves a 4.3% reduction in net CO2 reduction and a 10.2% reduction in energy consumption. Then, an economic analysis reveals the PtMe-SOE-HSP design as the superior design under scenarios of reduced electrolyzer CAPEX and increased electrolyzer lifetime. These findings are valuable for improving the techno-economic-environmental performance of the PtMe process. Moreover, the proposed integration strategies and ML-based superstructure optimization approach hold the promise for enhancing other power-to-liquid processes.
先进的集成策略和基于机器学习的上层结构优化,促进电力转化为甲醇
电力制甲醇(PtMe)工艺面临着重大挑战,包括生产成本高、能效低,以及缺乏系统、适用的集成设计和上部结构优化方法。本研究提出了先进的集成和基于机器学习(ML)的上层结构优化方法,旨在提高 PtMe 工艺的性能。由于碱性水电解槽(AWE)、聚合物电解质膜电解槽(PEM)和固体氧化物电解槽(SOE)的技术就绪程度较高,因此被选作研究对象。经过验证的这些电解槽数学模型与其他装置相结合,形成了 3 种常规设计和 12 种先进设计。传统设计包括基于电解槽的 H2 和 CO2-甲醇部分。相比之下,先进的设计将这些部分与四种废物再利用策略相结合,包括热能 (H)、热能和蒸汽 (HS)、热能和电力 (HP) 以及热能、蒸汽和电力 (HSP) 发电。技术经济分析表明了电解槽在铂镁工艺中的关键作用。开发了两个深度神经网络(DNN)模型来表示铂镁工艺的上层建筑设计。在边际训练误差和测试误差(0.28% 和 1.03%)的情况下,选择一热矢量-DNN(OHV-DNN)模型来提出四个优化问题,确定 PtMe-SOE-HSP 和 PtMe-AWE-HSP 设计为考虑碳税的能耗和生产成本最小化的最佳解决方案。PtMe-AWE 和 PtMe-SOE 设计是传统设计中的最佳候选方案。与最优传统设计相比,最优先进设计的技术经济环境性能提高了 1.8-29.7%。此外,与 PtMe-AWE-HSP 设计相比,PtMe-SOE-HSP 设计的二氧化碳净减排量减少了 4.3%,能耗减少了 10.2%。然后,经济分析表明,在降低电解槽资本支出和延长电解槽使用寿命的情况下,PtMe-SOE-HSP 设计更胜一筹。这些发现对于改善 PtMe 工艺的技术-经济-环境性能非常有价值。此外,所提出的集成策略和基于 ML 的上层结构优化方法也有望改善其他电转液工艺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Energy
Applied Energy 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
10.70%
发文量
1830
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Applied Energy serves as a platform for sharing innovations, research, development, and demonstrations in energy conversion, conservation, and sustainable energy systems. The journal covers topics such as optimal energy resource use, environmental pollutant mitigation, and energy process analysis. It welcomes original papers, review articles, technical notes, and letters to the editor. Authors are encouraged to submit manuscripts that bridge the gap between research, development, and implementation. The journal addresses a wide spectrum of topics, including fossil and renewable energy technologies, energy economics, and environmental impacts. Applied Energy also explores modeling and forecasting, conservation strategies, and the social and economic implications of energy policies, including climate change mitigation. It is complemented by the open-access journal Advances in Applied Energy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信