Prevalence of vascular injury in patients with orthopaedic trauma on the knee at Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital

Nangamso Mkombe , Sebastian Keith Mcdonald Magobotha , Maxwell Jingo , Collen Sandile Nkosi , Richard Danny Kgabu
{"title":"Prevalence of vascular injury in patients with orthopaedic trauma on the knee at Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital","authors":"Nangamso Mkombe ,&nbsp;Sebastian Keith Mcdonald Magobotha ,&nbsp;Maxwell Jingo ,&nbsp;Collen Sandile Nkosi ,&nbsp;Richard Danny Kgabu","doi":"10.1016/j.jorep.2024.100491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Vascular injuries are frequently observed in cases of musculoskeletal trauma affecting the knee. The evidenced-based protocols are underutilised. This often leads to the overuse of Computed Tomography Angiogram (CTA). The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of arterial damage among individuals with knee musculoskeletal injuries.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>All individuals with distal femur fracture, knee instability, and proximal tibia fractures were obtained from the picture archiving and communication system (PACS). These individuals were either being investigated for vascular injury or done radiological investigations for orthopaedic surgical planning. The data were obtained from 01 June 2017 to 30 June 2022. The reports from the CTA were examined to identify instances of vascular damage.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Five hundred and fifteen patients were collected from PACS. The overall prevalence of vascular damage among individuals with musculoskeletal knee injuries was found to be 9.7 %. The confidence interval was 7.1‒12.3 %. There were no discernible variations in the prevalence between males and females. There was a positive correlation between the age of the patient and the prevalence of vascular injury. This suggests that younger people have a higher prevalence. Penetrating injuries and knee dislocation had higher rates of vascular injury and the rates were 17.8% and 15.4%, respectively. Patients with soft signs of vascular injury had a low rate of 10.8 %. Only one in 10 patients with soft signs vascular injury had CTA confirming vascular injury. Therefore, using soft signs of vascular injury as indication for CTA was found not to be cost effective.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The prevalence of vascular injury at our hospital, a tertiary hospital in Soweto is within the global range that is reported in the literature. Further screening patients with soft signs of vascular.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Reports","volume":"4 4","pages":"Article 100491"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773157X24001863","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Vascular injuries are frequently observed in cases of musculoskeletal trauma affecting the knee. The evidenced-based protocols are underutilised. This often leads to the overuse of Computed Tomography Angiogram (CTA). The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of arterial damage among individuals with knee musculoskeletal injuries.

Methods

All individuals with distal femur fracture, knee instability, and proximal tibia fractures were obtained from the picture archiving and communication system (PACS). These individuals were either being investigated for vascular injury or done radiological investigations for orthopaedic surgical planning. The data were obtained from 01 June 2017 to 30 June 2022. The reports from the CTA were examined to identify instances of vascular damage.

Results

Five hundred and fifteen patients were collected from PACS. The overall prevalence of vascular damage among individuals with musculoskeletal knee injuries was found to be 9.7 %. The confidence interval was 7.1‒12.3 %. There were no discernible variations in the prevalence between males and females. There was a positive correlation between the age of the patient and the prevalence of vascular injury. This suggests that younger people have a higher prevalence. Penetrating injuries and knee dislocation had higher rates of vascular injury and the rates were 17.8% and 15.4%, respectively. Patients with soft signs of vascular injury had a low rate of 10.8 %. Only one in 10 patients with soft signs vascular injury had CTA confirming vascular injury. Therefore, using soft signs of vascular injury as indication for CTA was found not to be cost effective.

Conclusion

The prevalence of vascular injury at our hospital, a tertiary hospital in Soweto is within the global range that is reported in the literature. Further screening patients with soft signs of vascular.
克里斯-哈尼-巴拉夸那思学术医院膝关节骨科创伤患者血管损伤的发生率
背景在影响膝关节的肌肉骨骼创伤病例中,经常可以观察到血管损伤。以证据为基础的方案未得到充分利用。这往往导致过度使用计算机断层扫描血管造影术(CTA)。本研究的目的是评估膝关节肌肉骨骼损伤患者中动脉损伤的发生率。方法从图片存档和通信系统(PACS)中获取所有股骨远端骨折、膝关节不稳定和胫骨近端骨折患者的资料。这些患者要么正在接受血管损伤检查,要么正在接受骨科手术规划的放射检查。数据采集时间为 2017 年 6 月 1 日至 2022 年 6 月 30 日。对 CTA 的报告进行了检查,以确定血管损伤的情况。结果发现,膝关节肌肉骨骼损伤患者的血管损伤总发生率为 9.7%。置信区间为 7.1-12.3%。男性和女性的发病率没有明显差异。患者的年龄与血管损伤的发生率呈正相关。这表明年轻人的发病率更高。穿透性损伤和膝关节脱位的血管损伤发生率较高,分别为17.8%和15.4%。有血管损伤软迹象的患者比例较低,仅为 10.8%。每 10 名有血管损伤软体征的患者中,只有 1 人通过 CTA 证实了血管损伤。因此,将血管损伤软体征作为 CTA 的适应症并不划算。进一步筛查有血管软组织损伤迹象的患者,将有助于降低成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信