Characteristics associated with adult non-fatal opioid and stimulant overdose and substance use disorder emergency department visits in Michigan

Olivia Martin , Harriet Bird , Sarah Nechuta
{"title":"Characteristics associated with adult non-fatal opioid and stimulant overdose and substance use disorder emergency department visits in Michigan","authors":"Olivia Martin ,&nbsp;Harriet Bird ,&nbsp;Sarah Nechuta","doi":"10.1016/j.dadr.2024.100290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Understanding risk factors for emergency department (ED) visits for overdose and substance use disorder (SUD) can inform prevention efforts. Few studies have considered non-fatal opioid overdoses, stimulant overdoses and SUD, and limited data exists by overdose intentionality and by sex.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a serial cross-sectional study with Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Michigan (MI) 2019–2020 ED discharge data (<em>n</em>=5,716,716). Primary outcomes included non-fatal opioid overdoses, non-fatal stimulant overdoses, and SUD primary diagnoses in a single ED visit. We examined demographic and socioeconomic factors associated with study outcomes using binary and multinomial logistic regression (for overdose intentionality) models, which estimated adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among all MI discharges, 13,908, 1,379, and 23,462 were nonfatal opioid, stimulant, or SUD overdose visits, respectively. Lower median household income (vs. higher income), male sex (vs. female), metropolitan county of residence (vs. small urban/rural), and Medicaid (vs. private insurance) were associated with increased odds of all outcomes. For example, ORs(95 % CIs) for Medicaid were 4.41(4.18,4.65), 2.25(1.95,2.60), and 2.80(2.70,2.91) for opioid overdoses, stimulant overdoses, and SUD, respectively. All outcomes had the highest increased odds in ages 28–32 years compared to 18–22 years. Stratification by sex and non-fatal overdose intentionality modified some associations, with the strongest associations observed for non-fatal opioid overdoses.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Male sex, Medicaid, and race/ethnicity were consistently associated with all outcomes similarly, but other characteristics varied in patterns, strengths of association, and statistical significance by outcome groups, sex, and non-fatal opioid or stimulant overdose intentionality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72841,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol dependence reports","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100290"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol dependence reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277272462400074X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Understanding risk factors for emergency department (ED) visits for overdose and substance use disorder (SUD) can inform prevention efforts. Few studies have considered non-fatal opioid overdoses, stimulant overdoses and SUD, and limited data exists by overdose intentionality and by sex.

Methods

We conducted a serial cross-sectional study with Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Michigan (MI) 2019–2020 ED discharge data (n=5,716,716). Primary outcomes included non-fatal opioid overdoses, non-fatal stimulant overdoses, and SUD primary diagnoses in a single ED visit. We examined demographic and socioeconomic factors associated with study outcomes using binary and multinomial logistic regression (for overdose intentionality) models, which estimated adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI).

Results

Among all MI discharges, 13,908, 1,379, and 23,462 were nonfatal opioid, stimulant, or SUD overdose visits, respectively. Lower median household income (vs. higher income), male sex (vs. female), metropolitan county of residence (vs. small urban/rural), and Medicaid (vs. private insurance) were associated with increased odds of all outcomes. For example, ORs(95 % CIs) for Medicaid were 4.41(4.18,4.65), 2.25(1.95,2.60), and 2.80(2.70,2.91) for opioid overdoses, stimulant overdoses, and SUD, respectively. All outcomes had the highest increased odds in ages 28–32 years compared to 18–22 years. Stratification by sex and non-fatal overdose intentionality modified some associations, with the strongest associations observed for non-fatal opioid overdoses.

Conclusions

Male sex, Medicaid, and race/ethnicity were consistently associated with all outcomes similarly, but other characteristics varied in patterns, strengths of association, and statistical significance by outcome groups, sex, and non-fatal opioid or stimulant overdose intentionality.
与密歇根州成人非致命性阿片类药物和兴奋剂过量以及药物使用障碍急诊就诊相关的特征
背景了解因用药过量和药物使用障碍(SUD)而到急诊科(ED)就诊的风险因素可以为预防工作提供参考。很少有研究考虑了非致命性阿片类药物过量、兴奋剂过量和药物使用障碍,按过量意图和性别分列的数据也很有限。方法我们利用密歇根州(MI)2019-2020 年医疗成本和利用项目急诊科出院数据(n=5,716,716)开展了一项连续横断面研究。主要结果包括非致命性阿片类药物过量、非致命性兴奋剂过量和单次 ED 就诊中的 SUD 主要诊断。我们使用二元和多叉逻辑回归(针对用药过量的意向性)模型研究了与研究结果相关的人口和社会经济因素,并估算了调整后的几率比(AOR)和 95% 的置信区间(CI)。结果在所有 MI 出院患者中,分别有 13908 人、1379 人和 23462 人因非致命性阿片类药物、兴奋剂或 SUD 用药过量就诊。家庭收入中位数较低(与收入较高)、男性(与女性)、居住地为大都市(与小城市/农村)以及医疗补助(与私人保险)与所有结果的发生几率增加有关。例如,在阿片类药物过量、兴奋剂过量和 SUD 方面,医疗补助的 ORs(95 % CIs)分别为 4.41(4.18,4.65)、2.25(1.95,2.60)和 2.80(2.70,2.91)。与 18-22 岁的人群相比,28-32 岁的人群出现所有结果的几率增加最高。结论男性性别、医疗补助和种族/民族与所有结果的相关性相似,但其他特征在模式、相关性强度和统计显著性方面因结果组别、性别和非致命性阿片类药物或兴奋剂过量的意向性而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drug and alcohol dependence reports
Drug and alcohol dependence reports Psychiatry and Mental Health
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
100 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信