Application of bioelectrical impedance phase angle in mice: Comparison between young and old mice

Q3 Nursing
Nobuto Nakanishi, Nagato Katsura, Jun Sugiyama, Joji Kotani
{"title":"Application of bioelectrical impedance phase angle in mice: Comparison between young and old mice","authors":"Nobuto Nakanishi,&nbsp;Nagato Katsura,&nbsp;Jun Sugiyama,&nbsp;Joji Kotani","doi":"10.1016/j.nutos.2024.10.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Phase angle is an important parameter for assessing tissue quality. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is used to assess phase angle in human subjects, but its application in mice is scarcely reported.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A commercially available BIA device (InBody M20, InBody, Korea) was used in this study. Needles were inserted subcutaneously for measurements under inhaled anesthesia. The phase angle at 50 kH was used for comparison. First, the measurements were conducted in different electrode positions (proximal or distal) and different time series during anesthesia or after euthanasia. Second, we compared the phase angle, body weight, grip strength, and tibialis anterior muscle cross-sectional area between young (12 weeks) and old (approximately 2 years) male C57BL/6J mice.</div></div><div><h3>Result</h3><div>The phase angle was different in the proximal or distal position of the electrode (<em>p</em> = 0.02). Although the phase angle changed after euthanasia, it was not different during anesthesia (<em>p</em> = 0.39–84). Under distal electrode position and anesthesia, the body weight and cross-sectional area of the right anterior muscle were higher in old mice than in young mice (young vs. old, body weight: 24.4 ± 1.0 g vs. 33.2 ± 3.4 g, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01; cross-sectional area: 723 ± 365 μm<sup>2</sup> vs. 977 ± 398 μm<sup>2</sup>, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01), but grip strength was lower in old mice (14.6 ± 1.3 g vs. 12.7 ± 1.8 g, <em>p</em> = 0.02). The phase angle was lower in old mice than in young mice (11.5 ± 0.9 vs. 10.2 ± 1.2, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.02).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>BIA measurement in mice was feasible and reproducible, and the low phase angle was associated with reduced muscle strength.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36134,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Nutrition Open Science","volume":"58 ","pages":"Pages 265-274"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Nutrition Open Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667268524001062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Phase angle is an important parameter for assessing tissue quality. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is used to assess phase angle in human subjects, but its application in mice is scarcely reported.

Methods

A commercially available BIA device (InBody M20, InBody, Korea) was used in this study. Needles were inserted subcutaneously for measurements under inhaled anesthesia. The phase angle at 50 kH was used for comparison. First, the measurements were conducted in different electrode positions (proximal or distal) and different time series during anesthesia or after euthanasia. Second, we compared the phase angle, body weight, grip strength, and tibialis anterior muscle cross-sectional area between young (12 weeks) and old (approximately 2 years) male C57BL/6J mice.

Result

The phase angle was different in the proximal or distal position of the electrode (p = 0.02). Although the phase angle changed after euthanasia, it was not different during anesthesia (p = 0.39–84). Under distal electrode position and anesthesia, the body weight and cross-sectional area of the right anterior muscle were higher in old mice than in young mice (young vs. old, body weight: 24.4 ± 1.0 g vs. 33.2 ± 3.4 g, p < 0.01; cross-sectional area: 723 ± 365 μm2 vs. 977 ± 398 μm2, p < 0.01), but grip strength was lower in old mice (14.6 ± 1.3 g vs. 12.7 ± 1.8 g, p = 0.02). The phase angle was lower in old mice than in young mice (11.5 ± 0.9 vs. 10.2 ± 1.2, p < 0.02).

Conclusion

BIA measurement in mice was feasible and reproducible, and the low phase angle was associated with reduced muscle strength.
生物电阻抗相位角在小鼠中的应用:年轻小鼠与年老小鼠的比较
引言 相位角是评估组织质量的一个重要参数。生物电阻抗分析(BIA)可用于评估人体的相位角,但其在小鼠中的应用却鲜有报道。方法 本研究使用了市售的 BIA 设备(InBody M20,InBody,韩国)。在吸入麻醉状态下将针插入皮下进行测量。使用 50 kH 时的相位角进行比较。首先,在不同的电极位置(近端或远端)以及麻醉期间或安乐死后的不同时间序列进行测量。其次,我们比较了年轻(12 周)和年老(约 2 岁)雄性 C57BL/6J 小鼠的相位角、体重、握力和胫骨前肌横截面积。虽然相位角在安乐死后发生了变化,但在麻醉期间并无不同(p = 0.39-84)。在远端电极位置和麻醉条件下,老龄小鼠右前肌的体重和横截面积均高于年轻小鼠(年轻小鼠与老龄小鼠相比,体重:24.4 ± 1.0 g vs. 33.2 ± 3.4 g,p < 0.01;横截面积:723 ± 365 μm):723 ± 365 μm2 vs. 977 ± 398 μm2, p < 0.01),但老年小鼠的握力较低(14.6 ± 1.3 g vs. 12.7 ± 1.8 g, p = 0.02)。老龄小鼠的相位角低于年轻小鼠(11.5 ± 0.9 vs. 10.2 ± 1.2,p = 0.02)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Nutrition Open Science
Clinical Nutrition Open Science Nursing-Nutrition and Dietetics
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信