Push–Pull Intercropping Increases the Antiherbivore Benzoxazinoid Glycoside Content in Maize Leaf Tissue

IF 2.3 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Jakob Lang*, Sergio E. Ramos, Linus Reichert, Grace M. Amboka, Celina Apel, Frank Chidawanyika, Andargachew Detebo, Felipe Librán-Embid, David Meinhof, Laurent Bigler and Meredith C. Schuman*, 
{"title":"Push–Pull Intercropping Increases the Antiherbivore Benzoxazinoid Glycoside Content in Maize Leaf Tissue","authors":"Jakob Lang*,&nbsp;Sergio E. Ramos,&nbsp;Linus Reichert,&nbsp;Grace M. Amboka,&nbsp;Celina Apel,&nbsp;Frank Chidawanyika,&nbsp;Andargachew Detebo,&nbsp;Felipe Librán-Embid,&nbsp;David Meinhof,&nbsp;Laurent Bigler and Meredith C. Schuman*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsagscitech.4c0038610.1021/acsagscitech.4c00386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Push–pull technology refers to a promising mixed cropping practice for sustainable agricultural intensification, which uses properties of intercrop and border crop species to defend a focal crop against pests. Currently, the most widely practiced system uses <i>Desmodium</i> spp. as intercrop and Brachiaria or Napier grass as border crops to protect maize (<i>Zea mays</i>) against both insect pests and parasitic weeds. Several previous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of the push–pull system, but research on the underlying chemical mechanisms has mostly been limited to laboratory and glasshouse experiments that may not fully reproduce the complexity of the system under natural conditions. To address this limitation, we performed a large-scale study in farmer-operated push–pull maize fields in three east African countries. We compared maize leaf extracts from plants grown on push–pull fields with maize from fields employing conventional agricultural practices to assess the influence of push–pull cultivation on the maize metabolome. We identified two benzoxazinoid glycosides, which are known to have antiherbivore properties and were present in greater relative abundance in push–pull-cultivated maize leaves across three countries. Our data thus suggest that maize cultivated under push–pull has an increased resistance to herbivore attack compared to maize grown under conventional local agricultural practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":93846,"journal":{"name":"ACS agricultural science & technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acsagscitech.4c00386","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS agricultural science & technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsagscitech.4c00386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Push–pull technology refers to a promising mixed cropping practice for sustainable agricultural intensification, which uses properties of intercrop and border crop species to defend a focal crop against pests. Currently, the most widely practiced system uses Desmodium spp. as intercrop and Brachiaria or Napier grass as border crops to protect maize (Zea mays) against both insect pests and parasitic weeds. Several previous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of the push–pull system, but research on the underlying chemical mechanisms has mostly been limited to laboratory and glasshouse experiments that may not fully reproduce the complexity of the system under natural conditions. To address this limitation, we performed a large-scale study in farmer-operated push–pull maize fields in three east African countries. We compared maize leaf extracts from plants grown on push–pull fields with maize from fields employing conventional agricultural practices to assess the influence of push–pull cultivation on the maize metabolome. We identified two benzoxazinoid glycosides, which are known to have antiherbivore properties and were present in greater relative abundance in push–pull-cultivated maize leaves across three countries. Our data thus suggest that maize cultivated under push–pull has an increased resistance to herbivore attack compared to maize grown under conventional local agricultural practices.

推拉间作提高了玉米叶片组织中的抗食草动物苯并恶嗪苷含量
推拉技术是指一种很有前景的可持续农业集约化混合种植方法,它利用间作作物和边缘作物物种的特性来保护重点作物免受害虫侵害。目前,最广泛采用的耕作制度是将禾本科植物作为间作作物,将禾本科植物或拿坡里草作为边缘作物,以保护玉米(Zea mays)免受害虫和寄生杂草的侵害。之前的一些研究已经证明了推拉系统的功效,但对其基本化学机制的研究大多局限于实验室和温室实验,可能无法完全再现自然条件下该系统的复杂性。为了解决这一局限性,我们在三个东非国家的农民操作的推拉式玉米田进行了大规模研究。我们比较了在推拉式玉米田和采用传统农业耕作法的玉米田中生长的玉米叶片提取物,以评估推拉式栽培对玉米代谢组的影响。我们发现了两种苯并恶嗪类糖苷,它们具有抗食草动物的特性,在三个国家的推拉栽培玉米叶片中相对含量更高。因此,我们的数据表明,与当地传统农业耕作方式下种植的玉米相比,推拉栽培的玉米具有更强的抗食草动物攻击的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信