Feasibility, Tolerability, and Preliminary Clinical Response of Fractionated Radiopharmaceutical Therapy with 213Bi-FAPI-46: Pilot Experience in Patients with End-Stage, Progressive Metastatic Tumors.

Andreas Helisch, Clemens Kratochwil, Christian Kleist, Susanne Krämer, Juan Jose Rosales Castillo, Katharina Dendl, Hendrik Rathke, Isabelle von Goetze, Mathias Schreckenberger, Dirk Jäger, Thomas Lindner, Walter Mier, Frederik Giesel, Uwe Haberkorn, Manuel Röhrich
{"title":"Feasibility, Tolerability, and Preliminary Clinical Response of Fractionated Radiopharmaceutical Therapy with <sup>213</sup>Bi-FAPI-46: Pilot Experience in Patients with End-Stage, Progressive Metastatic Tumors.","authors":"Andreas Helisch, Clemens Kratochwil, Christian Kleist, Susanne Krämer, Juan Jose Rosales Castillo, Katharina Dendl, Hendrik Rathke, Isabelle von Goetze, Mathias Schreckenberger, Dirk Jäger, Thomas Lindner, Walter Mier, Frederik Giesel, Uwe Haberkorn, Manuel Röhrich","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.124.268386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Radiopharmaceutical therapies (RPTs) based on fibroblast activation protein (FAP) and FAP inhibitors (FAPIs) are a new option for progressive metastatic cancer in patients pretreated multiple times. To date, published in-human data refer to initial experiences with β-emitting <sup>90</sup>Y- and <sup>177</sup>Lu-based RPT. However, the short tumor retention time of FAPI ligands is considered a major limitation of FAPI RPT. Therefore, fractionated FAPI RPT with <sup>213</sup>Bi, an α-emitter with a half-life of 46 min, appears to be a promising FAPI RPT regimen. Here, we report on our initial experiences with regard to the feasibility, tolerability, and response of fractionated <sup>213</sup>Bi-FAPI-46 RPT. <b>Methods:</b> Six patients (4 women and 2 men) with progressive metastatic solid tumors (3 colon cancer, 1 anal cancer, 1 breast cancer, and 1 prostate cancer) aged 16-77 y were treated with a mean of 1,609 MBq of <sup>213</sup>Bi-FAPI-46, fractionated into 53 single applications (range, 5-12 RPT applications per patient; mean, 8.8 applications) over a period of up to 107 h per patient. Of the 6 patients, 4 patients received adjuvant treatment with pembrolizumab. <sup>18</sup>F-FDG (4 patients) and <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-46 (5 patients) PET/CT scans were performed before and after RPT. PET images were assessed visually and by calculating total lesion glycolysis and total lesion FAPI. <b>Results:</b> RPT with <sup>213</sup>Bi-FAPI-46 was well tolerated without adverse side effects. In terms of visual response assessment, there was 1 partial response (16.7%), 1 patient with stable disease (16.7%), and 4 patients with progressive disease (66.7%). Concordantly, total lesion glycolysis and total lesion FAPI were decreased in the responding patient (not applicable and -24.3%, respectively), slightly decreased in the patient with stable disease (-10.6% and -5.9%, respectively), and increased in the 4 patients with progression (mean, +104.4% and +321.3%, respectively). <b>Conclusion:</b> Fractionated FAPI RPT with the short-half-life α-emitter <sup>213</sup>Bi-FAPI-46 is a promising approach that matches the pharmacokinetics of FAPI-46 better than the <sup>177</sup>Lu- or <sup>90</sup>Y-labeled compounds. In this pilot project, fractionated RPT with <sup>213</sup>Bi-FAPI-46 showed good clinical tolerability and even led to regressive or stable disease in the short term in 2 of 6 patients. Further studies with larger patient cohorts are required to evaluate the actual efficacy and long-term effects of this variant of FAPI RPT.</p>","PeriodicalId":94099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.268386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Radiopharmaceutical therapies (RPTs) based on fibroblast activation protein (FAP) and FAP inhibitors (FAPIs) are a new option for progressive metastatic cancer in patients pretreated multiple times. To date, published in-human data refer to initial experiences with β-emitting 90Y- and 177Lu-based RPT. However, the short tumor retention time of FAPI ligands is considered a major limitation of FAPI RPT. Therefore, fractionated FAPI RPT with 213Bi, an α-emitter with a half-life of 46 min, appears to be a promising FAPI RPT regimen. Here, we report on our initial experiences with regard to the feasibility, tolerability, and response of fractionated 213Bi-FAPI-46 RPT. Methods: Six patients (4 women and 2 men) with progressive metastatic solid tumors (3 colon cancer, 1 anal cancer, 1 breast cancer, and 1 prostate cancer) aged 16-77 y were treated with a mean of 1,609 MBq of 213Bi-FAPI-46, fractionated into 53 single applications (range, 5-12 RPT applications per patient; mean, 8.8 applications) over a period of up to 107 h per patient. Of the 6 patients, 4 patients received adjuvant treatment with pembrolizumab. 18F-FDG (4 patients) and 68Ga-FAPI-46 (5 patients) PET/CT scans were performed before and after RPT. PET images were assessed visually and by calculating total lesion glycolysis and total lesion FAPI. Results: RPT with 213Bi-FAPI-46 was well tolerated without adverse side effects. In terms of visual response assessment, there was 1 partial response (16.7%), 1 patient with stable disease (16.7%), and 4 patients with progressive disease (66.7%). Concordantly, total lesion glycolysis and total lesion FAPI were decreased in the responding patient (not applicable and -24.3%, respectively), slightly decreased in the patient with stable disease (-10.6% and -5.9%, respectively), and increased in the 4 patients with progression (mean, +104.4% and +321.3%, respectively). Conclusion: Fractionated FAPI RPT with the short-half-life α-emitter 213Bi-FAPI-46 is a promising approach that matches the pharmacokinetics of FAPI-46 better than the 177Lu- or 90Y-labeled compounds. In this pilot project, fractionated RPT with 213Bi-FAPI-46 showed good clinical tolerability and even led to regressive or stable disease in the short term in 2 of 6 patients. Further studies with larger patient cohorts are required to evaluate the actual efficacy and long-term effects of this variant of FAPI RPT.

使用 213Bi-FAPI-46 进行分次放射性药物治疗的可行性、耐受性和初步临床反应:晚期进展期转移性肿瘤患者的试点经验。
基于成纤维细胞活化蛋白(FAP)和成纤维细胞活化蛋白抑制剂(FAPIs)的放射性药物疗法(RPTs)是治疗经过多次预处理的进展期转移性癌症患者的一种新选择。迄今为止,已发表的人体数据是基于β发射的 90Y 和 177Lu RPT 的初步经验。然而,FAPI 配体的肿瘤滞留时间短被认为是 FAPI RPT 的主要局限性。因此,使用半衰期为46分钟的α发射体213Bi进行分型FAPI RPT似乎是一种很有前景的FAPI RPT方案。在此,我们报告了我们在分化 213Bi-FAPI-46 RPT 的可行性、耐受性和反应方面的初步经验。方法:六名年龄在 16-77 岁之间的进展期转移性实体瘤患者(4 名女性和 2 名男性)(3 名结肠癌患者、1 名肛门癌患者、1 名乳腺癌患者和 1 名前列腺癌患者)接受了平均 1,609 MBq 的 213Bi-FAPI-46 治疗,每个患者在长达 107 小时的时间内分 53 次应用(每位患者 5-12 次 RPT 应用;平均 8.8 次应用)。在 6 名患者中,4 名患者接受了 pembrolizumab 的辅助治疗。RPT前后分别进行了18F-FDG(4名患者)和68Ga-FAPI-46(5名患者)PET/CT扫描。对 PET 图像进行目测评估,并计算总病灶糖酵解和总病灶 FAPI。结果使用 213Bi-FAPI-46 进行 RPT 的耐受性良好,无不良副作用。在视觉反应评估方面,有 1 例部分反应(16.7%),1 例病情稳定(16.7%),4 例病情进展(66.7%)。同时,有反应的患者总病灶糖酵解和总病灶 FAPI 有所下降(分别为不适用和-24.3%),病情稳定的患者略有下降(分别为-10.6%和-5.9%),而病情进展的 4 名患者则有所上升(平均分别为+104.4%和+321.3%)。结论与 177Lu 或 90Y 标记的化合物相比,使用短半衰期 α 发射体 213Bi-FAPI-46 的分馏 FAPI RPT 是一种很有前景的方法,它能更好地匹配 FAPI-46 的药代动力学。在这一试点项目中,使用 213Bi-FAPI-46 的分馏 RPT 显示出良好的临床耐受性,甚至在 6 名患者中有 2 名患者的病情在短期内得到了缓解或稳定。要评估这种变体 FAPI RPT 的实际疗效和长期效果,还需要对更大的患者群体进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信