Mina Manasseh, Islam Mt Elsamalouty, Cho Nu San, Marcos Kostalas
{"title":"Exploring Risk Factors for Post-operative Complications in Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration: A Literature Review.","authors":"Mina Manasseh, Islam Mt Elsamalouty, Cho Nu San, Marcos Kostalas","doi":"10.7759/cureus.72570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gallstone-related diseases, particularly common bile duct (CBD) stones, pose a significant global health challenge. The emergence of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) has transformed the management of these conditions by offering a less invasive alternative to traditional open surgery. This literature review aims to analyze published literature to identify and understand the risk factors associated with LCBDE. The study aims to offer valuable insights that could potentially enhance patient care and outcomes in managing CBD stones. A comprehensive search of English-language studies from the past 20 years was conducted using PubMed, focusing on peer-reviewed primary research, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. From 830 initial articles, 25 were selected based on relevance and availability. The review identified several key risk factors influencing LCBDE outcomes, including patient-related factors such as advanced age, high comorbidity scores, narrow bile ducts, and complex stones, which increase the likelihood of complications. Surgeon experience also plays a crucial role, with lower complication rates observed among surgeons who have performed at least 70 LCBDE procedures over a 10-year period. Additionally, procedure-related factors such as the transcystic (TC) approach, primary suture (PS) closure, and intraoperative imaging were found to reduce complication rates. LCBDE remains a promising approach for managing bile duct stones, particularly when patient, surgeon, and procedural factors are optimized.</p>","PeriodicalId":93960,"journal":{"name":"Cureus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11519757/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cureus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.72570","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Gallstone-related diseases, particularly common bile duct (CBD) stones, pose a significant global health challenge. The emergence of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) has transformed the management of these conditions by offering a less invasive alternative to traditional open surgery. This literature review aims to analyze published literature to identify and understand the risk factors associated with LCBDE. The study aims to offer valuable insights that could potentially enhance patient care and outcomes in managing CBD stones. A comprehensive search of English-language studies from the past 20 years was conducted using PubMed, focusing on peer-reviewed primary research, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. From 830 initial articles, 25 were selected based on relevance and availability. The review identified several key risk factors influencing LCBDE outcomes, including patient-related factors such as advanced age, high comorbidity scores, narrow bile ducts, and complex stones, which increase the likelihood of complications. Surgeon experience also plays a crucial role, with lower complication rates observed among surgeons who have performed at least 70 LCBDE procedures over a 10-year period. Additionally, procedure-related factors such as the transcystic (TC) approach, primary suture (PS) closure, and intraoperative imaging were found to reduce complication rates. LCBDE remains a promising approach for managing bile duct stones, particularly when patient, surgeon, and procedural factors are optimized.