{"title":"Advancing Diabetic Dental Restorations: A Comparative Analysis of Alveolar Bone Loss in Class II Composite Resin Versus Amalgam Fillings.","authors":"Abdo Mohammed Mohammed Abdulrazzaq","doi":"10.7759/cureus.72642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction This study evaluated the impact of Class II composite resin and amalgam restorations on alveolar bone loss in diabetic patients, a population more susceptible to periodontal complications. The main objective was to determine whether the choice of restorative material impacts periodontal health, providing insights to optimize dental care for this high-risk group. Materials and methods This observational, comparative. cross-sectional study included 64 diabetic patients, divided into two groups based on their Class II restorations. Group 1 had 32 patients with composite resin restorations, while Group 2 comprised 32 patients with amalgam restorations. Both groups were matched for age and diabetes duration to ensure comparability. Periodontal health, specifically alveolar bone loss, was assessed through clinical and radiographic evaluations. The study analyzed the impact of the two materials on alveolar bone levels. Results Data from 64 diabetic patients (32 in Group 1 and 32 in Group 2) were statistically analyzed using PASW Statistics for Windows, Version 18.0 (Released 2009; SPSS Inc., Chicago, United States). Three statistical tests, descriptive statistics, two-sample t-test, and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), were used. The results showed significant differences between the two groups, with composite resin restorations linked to greater alveolar bone loss. Conclusion The choice of restorative material significantly influences periodontal health in diabetic patients. Composite resin restorations were associated with a higher risk of alveolar bone loss and periodontal disease, emphasizing the need for careful material selection and regular periodontal monitoring in diabetic patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":93960,"journal":{"name":"Cureus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11521317/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cureus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.72642","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction This study evaluated the impact of Class II composite resin and amalgam restorations on alveolar bone loss in diabetic patients, a population more susceptible to periodontal complications. The main objective was to determine whether the choice of restorative material impacts periodontal health, providing insights to optimize dental care for this high-risk group. Materials and methods This observational, comparative. cross-sectional study included 64 diabetic patients, divided into two groups based on their Class II restorations. Group 1 had 32 patients with composite resin restorations, while Group 2 comprised 32 patients with amalgam restorations. Both groups were matched for age and diabetes duration to ensure comparability. Periodontal health, specifically alveolar bone loss, was assessed through clinical and radiographic evaluations. The study analyzed the impact of the two materials on alveolar bone levels. Results Data from 64 diabetic patients (32 in Group 1 and 32 in Group 2) were statistically analyzed using PASW Statistics for Windows, Version 18.0 (Released 2009; SPSS Inc., Chicago, United States). Three statistical tests, descriptive statistics, two-sample t-test, and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), were used. The results showed significant differences between the two groups, with composite resin restorations linked to greater alveolar bone loss. Conclusion The choice of restorative material significantly influences periodontal health in diabetic patients. Composite resin restorations were associated with a higher risk of alveolar bone loss and periodontal disease, emphasizing the need for careful material selection and regular periodontal monitoring in diabetic patients.