Assessment of the use of Open Educational Resources at five European Library and Information Science higher education institutions during and post-COVID-19 pandemic.

Open research Europe Pub Date : 2024-10-25 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.12688/openreseurope.17457.3
Gema Santos-Hermosa, Cristóbal Urbano, Sílvia Argudo, Juan-José Boté-Vericad, Anja Đurđevic, Milijana Micunovic, Lea Wöbbekind, Tania Todorova
{"title":"Assessment of the use of Open Educational Resources at five European Library and Information Science higher education institutions during and post-COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Gema Santos-Hermosa, Cristóbal Urbano, Sílvia Argudo, Juan-José Boté-Vericad, Anja Đurđevic, Milijana Micunovic, Lea Wöbbekind, Tania Todorova","doi":"10.12688/openreseurope.17457.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article presents an analysis of the impact of Open Educational Resources (OER) during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as their potential use in the post-pandemic, in Library and Information Science (LIS) higher education institutions. The research explored how OER were used and created, what were the main barriers and drivers in practice and some main lessons learned that can help to improve the quality and increase the use of OER beyond times of crisis. The research was based on fieldwork carried out in the LIS departments of the universities of Barcelona (Spain), Hildesheim (Germany), Osijek and Zagreb (Croatia) and the University of Library Studies and Information Technologies in Sofia (Bulgaria). The methodology approach was qualitative and was based on interviews with faculty and focus groups with students. Results show that faculty members were still hesitant to adopt OER since they generally did not consider them. Moreover, those who did use them did so on their own initiative and as additional resources. We discuss the different speeds of OER implementation that have been observed depending on the faculty's prior level of knowledge, and on whether their institutions and countries are prepared to support the use of OER. The promotion of post-pandemic OER involves greater capacity building, as well as collaboration and institutional support. Students' attitudes about the usefulness of OER focus on their availability. The large number of teachers and students who participated in the study, as well as the international scope of the study, constitute a strength in the treatment of a topic such as the use of OER where the user perspectives and LIS context have been little addressed in the literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":74359,"journal":{"name":"Open research Europe","volume":"4 ","pages":"95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11523556/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open research Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.17457.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article presents an analysis of the impact of Open Educational Resources (OER) during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as their potential use in the post-pandemic, in Library and Information Science (LIS) higher education institutions. The research explored how OER were used and created, what were the main barriers and drivers in practice and some main lessons learned that can help to improve the quality and increase the use of OER beyond times of crisis. The research was based on fieldwork carried out in the LIS departments of the universities of Barcelona (Spain), Hildesheim (Germany), Osijek and Zagreb (Croatia) and the University of Library Studies and Information Technologies in Sofia (Bulgaria). The methodology approach was qualitative and was based on interviews with faculty and focus groups with students. Results show that faculty members were still hesitant to adopt OER since they generally did not consider them. Moreover, those who did use them did so on their own initiative and as additional resources. We discuss the different speeds of OER implementation that have been observed depending on the faculty's prior level of knowledge, and on whether their institutions and countries are prepared to support the use of OER. The promotion of post-pandemic OER involves greater capacity building, as well as collaboration and institutional support. Students' attitudes about the usefulness of OER focus on their availability. The large number of teachers and students who participated in the study, as well as the international scope of the study, constitute a strength in the treatment of a topic such as the use of OER where the user perspectives and LIS context have been little addressed in the literature.

评估欧洲五所图书馆和信息科学高等教育机构在 COVID-19 大流行期间和之后使用开放教育资源的情况。
本文分析了开放教育资源(OER)在 COVID-19 大流行期间对图书馆和信息科学(LIS)高等教育机构的影响及其在大流行后的潜在用途。研究探讨了开放式教育资源是如何使用和创建的,在实践中存在哪些主要障碍和驱动因素,以及可以帮助提高质量和增加开放式教育资源在危机后使用的一些主要经验教训。这项研究是在巴塞罗那(西班牙)、希尔德斯海姆(德国)、奥西耶克和萨格勒布(克罗地 亚)大学以及索非亚(保加利亚)图书馆学和信息技术大学的图书馆学和信息系统系开展的 实地工作的基础上进行的。研究方法采用定性方法,以教师访谈和学生焦点小组为基础。结果表明,教职员工在采用开放式教育资源方面仍然犹豫不决,因为他们一般不考虑开放式教育资源。此外,那些使用开放式教育资源的教师是主动将其作为额外资源使用的。我们讨论了开放式教育资源的不同实施速度,这些速度取决于教员先前的知识水平,以及他们所在的机构和国家是否准备好支持开放式教育资源的使用。推广大流行后的开放式教育资源需要加强能力建设、合作和机构支持。学生对开放式教育资源有用性的态度主要集中在其可用性上。参与这项研究的教师和学生人数众多,研究范围遍及全球,这是在处理开放式教育资源的使用这样一个主题时的优势所在,而文献中很少涉及用户视角和 LIS 背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信