Three principles for the utility of simple tasks that assess elemental processes in parsing heterogeneity.

IF 3.1 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Alexandra B Moussa-Tooks, Deanna M Barch, William P Hetrick
{"title":"Three principles for the utility of simple tasks that assess elemental processes in parsing heterogeneity.","authors":"Alexandra B Moussa-Tooks, Deanna M Barch, William P Hetrick","doi":"10.1037/abn0000908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As clinical psychological science and biological psychiatry push to assess, model, and integrate heterogeneity and individual differences, approaches leveraging computational modeling, translational methods, and dimensional approaches to psychopathology are increasingly useful in establishing brain-behavior relationships. The field is ultimately interested in complex human behavior, and disruptions in such behaviors can arise through many different pathways, leading to heterogeneity in etiology for seemingly similar presentations. Parsing this complexity may be enhanced using \"simple\" tasks-which we define as those assaying elemental processes that are the building blocks to complexity. Using eyeblink conditioning as one illustrative example, we propose that simple tasks assessing elemental processes can be leveraged by and enhance computational psychiatry and dimensional approaches in service of understanding heterogeneity in psychiatry, especially when these tasks meet three principles: (a) an extensively mapped circuit, (b) clear brain-behavior relationships, and (c) relevance to understanding etiological processes and/or treatment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":73914,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science","volume":"133 8","pages":"690-696"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000908","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As clinical psychological science and biological psychiatry push to assess, model, and integrate heterogeneity and individual differences, approaches leveraging computational modeling, translational methods, and dimensional approaches to psychopathology are increasingly useful in establishing brain-behavior relationships. The field is ultimately interested in complex human behavior, and disruptions in such behaviors can arise through many different pathways, leading to heterogeneity in etiology for seemingly similar presentations. Parsing this complexity may be enhanced using "simple" tasks-which we define as those assaying elemental processes that are the building blocks to complexity. Using eyeblink conditioning as one illustrative example, we propose that simple tasks assessing elemental processes can be leveraged by and enhance computational psychiatry and dimensional approaches in service of understanding heterogeneity in psychiatry, especially when these tasks meet three principles: (a) an extensively mapped circuit, (b) clear brain-behavior relationships, and (c) relevance to understanding etiological processes and/or treatment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

在解析异质性时评估要素过程的简单任务的实用性的三个原则。
随着临床心理科学和生物精神病学推动对异质性和个体差异进行评估、建模和整合,利用计算建模、转化方法和心理病理学维度方法建立大脑与行为关系的方法越来越有用。该领域最终关注的是复杂的人类行为,而这些行为的破坏可能通过许多不同的途径产生,从而导致看似相似的病因具有异质性。使用 "简单 "任务可以增强对这种复杂性的解析--我们将 "简单 "任务定义为那些评估作为复杂性基石的基本过程的任务。以眼动调节为例,我们建议评估要素过程的简单任务可以利用并加强计算精神病学和维度方法,以帮助理解精神病学中的异质性,尤其是当这些任务符合以下三个原则时:(a) 广泛映射的回路,(b) 明确的大脑行为关系,以及 (c) 与了解病因过程和/或治疗相关。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信