Marlies Mulder, Karuna E W Vendrik, Sophie A M van Kessel, Daan W Notermans, Annelot F Schoffelen, Jacky Flipse, Antoni P A Hendrickx, Wil van der Zwet, Caroline Schneeberger-van der Linden
{"title":"Management of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in Dutch health care institutes: a nation-wide survey.","authors":"Marlies Mulder, Karuna E W Vendrik, Sophie A M van Kessel, Daan W Notermans, Annelot F Schoffelen, Jacky Flipse, Antoni P A Hendrickx, Wil van der Zwet, Caroline Schneeberger-van der Linden","doi":"10.1016/j.jhin.2024.09.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE<sub>fm</sub>) is an opportunistic pathogen, which can cause outbreaks in hospitals. In the Netherlands, several national guidelines and guidance documents on different aspects of VRE<sub>fm</sub>-management are available. Most available guidelines are written towards the hospital setting and only few on long-term care facilities (LTCFs). Moreover, not all aspects of VRE<sub>fm</sub>-management are covered, recommendations differ and the level of compliance to these guidelines is unknown. The aim of this study was to get insight into the routine VRE<sub>fm</sub>-policies in Dutch healthcare facilities with regard to screening, diagnostics and infection control measures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Online questionnaires were sent to representatives of Dutch hospitals and long-term care facilities (LTCFs). The questionnaire included questions regarding the definition of VRE, screening, diagnostics, patient isolation, cleaning procedures, VRE<sub>fm</sub>-clearance and VRE<sub>fm</sub>-outbreaks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The questionnaire was completed by 61 hospitals with a response rate of 84.1% and 57 LTCFs, mostly nursing homes. Most hospitals reported VRE-outbreaks in the previous decade, whereas only one LTCFs reported an outbreak. Of the hospitals, 87% perform VRE<sub>fm</sub>-screening versus 50% of the LTCFs. VRE-positive patients are isolated in 98% of hospitals and 83% of LTCFs. Protocols regarding how to unlabel VRE-positive patients are in place in 84% of the hospitals and in 51% of LTCFs. The details of these measures differ substantially between healthcare facilities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study has shown that most hospitals and some LTCFs in the Netherlands have standard procedures for VRE<sub>fm</sub>-management to some level, although the comprehensiveness and details of the measures differ per hospital. More uniform policies would improve comparability of VRE<sub>fm</sub> data on a regional/national level.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2024.09.028","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREfm) is an opportunistic pathogen, which can cause outbreaks in hospitals. In the Netherlands, several national guidelines and guidance documents on different aspects of VREfm-management are available. Most available guidelines are written towards the hospital setting and only few on long-term care facilities (LTCFs). Moreover, not all aspects of VREfm-management are covered, recommendations differ and the level of compliance to these guidelines is unknown. The aim of this study was to get insight into the routine VREfm-policies in Dutch healthcare facilities with regard to screening, diagnostics and infection control measures.
Materials and methods: Online questionnaires were sent to representatives of Dutch hospitals and long-term care facilities (LTCFs). The questionnaire included questions regarding the definition of VRE, screening, diagnostics, patient isolation, cleaning procedures, VREfm-clearance and VREfm-outbreaks.
Results: The questionnaire was completed by 61 hospitals with a response rate of 84.1% and 57 LTCFs, mostly nursing homes. Most hospitals reported VRE-outbreaks in the previous decade, whereas only one LTCFs reported an outbreak. Of the hospitals, 87% perform VREfm-screening versus 50% of the LTCFs. VRE-positive patients are isolated in 98% of hospitals and 83% of LTCFs. Protocols regarding how to unlabel VRE-positive patients are in place in 84% of the hospitals and in 51% of LTCFs. The details of these measures differ substantially between healthcare facilities.
Conclusion: This study has shown that most hospitals and some LTCFs in the Netherlands have standard procedures for VREfm-management to some level, although the comprehensiveness and details of the measures differ per hospital. More uniform policies would improve comparability of VREfm data on a regional/national level.