Go back to the original sources please!

IF 3 2区教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Advances in Health Sciences Education Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI:10.1007/s10459-024-10388-2

J.A. Cleland, A. Kuper, P. O’Sullivan

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This column is intended to address the kinds of knotty problems and dilemmas with which many scholars grapple in studying health professions education. In this article, we address the dilemma of engaging with foundational works versus depending on summary articles. We argue that an over-dependence on secondary sources can lead to prejudices and unquestioned assumptions, and limit the constructive development of our field. We urge health professions education scholars to honour the original literature not just for their own learning and understanding, but so that the field can move forward in developing theory and methodology.

查看原文本刊更多论文

请回到原始资料！

本专栏旨在解决许多学者在研究卫生专业教育时遇到的棘手问题和困境。在这篇文章中，我们将讨论参与基础性工作与依赖摘要文章的两难选择。我们认为，过度依赖二手资料会导致偏见和不加质疑的假设，并限制我们领域的建设性发展。我们敦促健康职业教育学者尊重原始文献，这不仅是为了他们自己的学习和理解，也是为了让这一领域能够在发展理论和方法论方面向前迈进。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Advances in Health Sciences Education 医学-卫生保健

CiteScore

6.90

自引率

12.50%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Advances in Health Sciences Education is a forum for scholarly and state-of-the art research into all aspects of health sciences education. It will publish empirical studies as well as discussions of theoretical issues and practical implications. The primary focus of the Journal is linking theory to practice, thus priority will be given to papers that have a sound theoretical basis and strong methodology.