Sustained Symptomatic Remission and Recovery and Their Loss Among Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder and Patients With Other Types of Personality Disorders: A 24-Year Prospective Follow-Up Study.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Mary C Zanarini, Frances R Frankenburg, Katherine E Hein, Isabel V Glass, Garrett M Fitzmaurice
{"title":"Sustained Symptomatic Remission and Recovery and Their Loss Among Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder and Patients With Other Types of Personality Disorders: A 24-Year Prospective Follow-Up Study.","authors":"Mary C Zanarini, Frances R Frankenburg, Katherine E Hein, Isabel V Glass, Garrett M Fitzmaurice","doi":"10.4088/JCP.24m15457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> The first purpose of this study was to determine time to attainment of symptomatic remissions and recoveries of 2-12 years duration for those with borderline personality disorder (BPD) and patients with other personality disorders (OPDs); the second was to determine the stability of these outcomes.</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> Two hundred ninety inpatients meeting both Revised Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines (DIB-R) and <i>DSM III-R</i> criteria for BPD and 72 patients with OPDs were assessed during their index admission using a series of semistructured interviews. The same instruments were readministered at 12 contiguous 2-year time periods.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> Patients with BPD were significantly slower to achieve remission or recovery (which involved good social and vocational functioning as well as symptomatic remission) than patients with OPD. However, those in both study groups ultimately achieved about the same high rates of remission (BPD patients: 77%-100%; patients with OPD: 97%-100%) but not recovery (37%-60% vs 68%-89%) by the time of the 24-year follow-up. In contrast, symptomatic recurrence (11%-40% vs 5%-10%) and loss of recovery (29%-59% vs 15%-42%) occurred more rapidly and at substantially higher rates among BPD patients than patients with OPD.</p><p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> Taken together, the results of this study suggest that sustained symptomatic remission is substantially more common than sustained recovery from BPD. They also suggest that loss of sustained recovery is more common than symptomatic recurrences for those with BPD.</p>","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"85 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.24m15457","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The first purpose of this study was to determine time to attainment of symptomatic remissions and recoveries of 2-12 years duration for those with borderline personality disorder (BPD) and patients with other personality disorders (OPDs); the second was to determine the stability of these outcomes.

Methods: Two hundred ninety inpatients meeting both Revised Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines (DIB-R) and DSM III-R criteria for BPD and 72 patients with OPDs were assessed during their index admission using a series of semistructured interviews. The same instruments were readministered at 12 contiguous 2-year time periods.

Results: Patients with BPD were significantly slower to achieve remission or recovery (which involved good social and vocational functioning as well as symptomatic remission) than patients with OPD. However, those in both study groups ultimately achieved about the same high rates of remission (BPD patients: 77%-100%; patients with OPD: 97%-100%) but not recovery (37%-60% vs 68%-89%) by the time of the 24-year follow-up. In contrast, symptomatic recurrence (11%-40% vs 5%-10%) and loss of recovery (29%-59% vs 15%-42%) occurred more rapidly and at substantially higher rates among BPD patients than patients with OPD.

Conclusions: Taken together, the results of this study suggest that sustained symptomatic remission is substantially more common than sustained recovery from BPD. They also suggest that loss of sustained recovery is more common than symptomatic recurrences for those with BPD.

边缘型人格障碍患者和其他类型人格障碍患者的持续症状缓解和康复及其损失:一项为期 24 年的前瞻性随访研究。
研究目的:本研究的第一个目的是确定边缘型人格障碍(BPD)患者和其他人格障碍(OPD)患者症状缓解和痊愈的持续时间;第二个目的是确定这些结果的稳定性:方法:对符合修订版边缘人格障碍诊断访谈(DIB-R)和 DSM III-R BPD 标准的 290 名住院患者和 72 名 OPD 患者在入院时进行了一系列半结构化访谈评估。结果发现,BPD 患者在入院时的反应明显慢于 OPD 患者:结果:BPD 患者的缓解或康复(包括良好的社会和职业功能以及症状缓解)明显慢于 OPD 患者。然而,在 24 年的随访中,两个研究组的患者最终都达到了同样高的缓解率(BPD 患者:77%-100%;OPD 患者:97%-100%),但没有达到痊愈率(37%-60% vs 68%-89%)。相比之下,BPD 患者症状复发(11%-40% vs 5%-10%)和丧失痊愈能力(29%-59% vs 15%-42%)的速度更快,发生率也大大高于 OPD 患者:综上所述,本研究结果表明,BPD 患者症状持续缓解的情况比持续康复的情况更为常见。研究结果还表明,对于 BPD 患者来说,失去持续康复比症状复发更为常见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: For over 75 years, The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry has been a leading source of peer-reviewed articles offering the latest information on mental health topics to psychiatrists and other medical professionals.The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry is the leading psychiatric resource for clinical information and covers disorders including depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, anxiety, addiction, posttraumatic stress disorder, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder while exploring the newest advances in diagnosis and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信