Survey of Practice Patterns in the Use of Superior Laryngeal Nerve Blocks.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Laryngoscope Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI:10.1002/lary.31864
Karim Asi, Dylan G Vance, Andrew G Tritter
{"title":"Survey of Practice Patterns in the Use of Superior Laryngeal Nerve Blocks.","authors":"Karim Asi, Dylan G Vance, Andrew G Tritter","doi":"10.1002/lary.31864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Superior laryngeal nerve (SLN) injection is performed for a variety of upper aerodigestive tract-related indications. Existing literature examines the efficacy of SLN injection for specific indications. However, there is a paucity of insight into overall practice patterns and a lack of standardization, particularly with regards to medication and dosing, treatment time frame, and circumstances. The goal of this study is to elucidate the practice patterns of SLN injection and allow for broader understanding of its utilization.</p><p><strong>Data sources/methods: </strong>This is a descriptive study of results from an electronic survey disseminated via email to US-based and international otolaryngologists and laryngologists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>80 responses were collected. 53.8% responders endorsed utilizing SLN injection in their practice, including 39/43 laryngologists (90.7%). Responders perform SLN injection for an array of indications, using a variety of anesthetic and steroid combinations and dosages. The most used steroid is triamcinolone (81.4%). The most used anesthetic is lidocaine (53.5%). 43% of respondents endorse willingness to perform bilateral injections simultaneously. Follow-up after initial injection is highly inconsistent, as are time intervals between injections and number of injections performed. With regards to side effects and complications discussed prior to the procedure, 95% counseled patients on pain/discomfort while roughly half of responders discussed bleeding/hematoma, aspiration risk, vasovagal response, and/or globus sensation, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first known study investigating the practice patterns of SLN injection. The substantial variability of responses reflects a lack of standardization of this procedure despite its widespread use. Further study is needed to optimize protocols.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Levels 5 and 6 Laryngoscope, 2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":49921,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.31864","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Superior laryngeal nerve (SLN) injection is performed for a variety of upper aerodigestive tract-related indications. Existing literature examines the efficacy of SLN injection for specific indications. However, there is a paucity of insight into overall practice patterns and a lack of standardization, particularly with regards to medication and dosing, treatment time frame, and circumstances. The goal of this study is to elucidate the practice patterns of SLN injection and allow for broader understanding of its utilization.

Data sources/methods: This is a descriptive study of results from an electronic survey disseminated via email to US-based and international otolaryngologists and laryngologists.

Results: 80 responses were collected. 53.8% responders endorsed utilizing SLN injection in their practice, including 39/43 laryngologists (90.7%). Responders perform SLN injection for an array of indications, using a variety of anesthetic and steroid combinations and dosages. The most used steroid is triamcinolone (81.4%). The most used anesthetic is lidocaine (53.5%). 43% of respondents endorse willingness to perform bilateral injections simultaneously. Follow-up after initial injection is highly inconsistent, as are time intervals between injections and number of injections performed. With regards to side effects and complications discussed prior to the procedure, 95% counseled patients on pain/discomfort while roughly half of responders discussed bleeding/hematoma, aspiration risk, vasovagal response, and/or globus sensation, respectively.

Conclusions: This is the first known study investigating the practice patterns of SLN injection. The substantial variability of responses reflects a lack of standardization of this procedure despite its widespread use. Further study is needed to optimize protocols.

Level of evidence: Levels 5 and 6 Laryngoscope, 2024.

使用喉上神经阻滞术的实践模式调查。
目的:喉上神经(SLN)注射适用于多种与上消化道相关的适应症。现有文献对特定适应症的喉上神经注射疗效进行了研究。但是,对总体实践模式的了解还很少,而且缺乏标准化,特别是在药物和剂量、治疗时间框架和环境方面。本研究的目的是阐明 SLN 注射的实践模式,以便更广泛地了解其使用情况:这是一项描述性研究,通过电子邮件向美国和国际耳鼻喉科和喉科专家发送电子调查结果:共收集到 80 份回复。53.8%的回复者赞同在其临床实践中使用 SLN 注射,其中包括 39/43 名喉科医师(90.7%)。答复者针对一系列适应症进行了 SLN 注射,使用了多种麻醉剂和类固醇组合及剂量。使用最多的类固醇是曲安奈德(81.4%)。使用最多的麻醉剂是利多卡因(53.5%)。43% 的受访者愿意同时进行双侧注射。首次注射后的随访、注射间隔时间和注射次数很不一致。关于术前讨论的副作用和并发症,95%的受访者就疼痛/不适感向患者提供了建议,而大约一半的受访者分别讨论了出血/血肿、吸入风险、血管迷走神经反应和/或球状感觉:这是第一项调查 SLN 注射实践模式的已知研究。结论:这是已知的第一项调查 SLN 注射实践模式的研究。反应的巨大差异反映出,尽管这种方法被广泛使用,但却缺乏标准化。需要进一步研究以优化方案:5 级和 6 级 《喉镜》,2024 年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Laryngoscope
Laryngoscope 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
500
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Laryngoscope has been the leading source of information on advances in the diagnosis and treatment of head and neck disorders since 1890. The Laryngoscope is the first choice among otolaryngologists for publication of their important findings and techniques. Each monthly issue of The Laryngoscope features peer-reviewed medical, clinical, and research contributions in general otolaryngology, allergy/rhinology, otology/neurotology, laryngology/bronchoesophagology, head and neck surgery, sleep medicine, pediatric otolaryngology, facial plastics and reconstructive surgery, oncology, and communicative disorders. Contributions include papers and posters presented at the Annual and Section Meetings of the Triological Society, as well as independent papers, "How I Do It", "Triological Best Practice" articles, and contemporary reviews. Theses authored by the Triological Society’s new Fellows as well as papers presented at meetings of the American Laryngological Association are published in The Laryngoscope. • Broncho-esophagology • Communicative disorders • Head and neck surgery • Plastic and reconstructive facial surgery • Oncology • Speech and hearing defects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信